与健康对照组相比,精神病患者在经颅直流电刺激过程中接收到的电场强度较低。

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rebecca Kazinka, Da Som Choi, Alexander Opitz, Kelvin O Lim
{"title":"与健康对照组相比,精神病患者在经颅直流电刺激过程中接收到的电场强度较低。","authors":"Rebecca Kazinka, Da Som Choi, Alexander Opitz, Kelvin O Lim","doi":"10.1038/s41537-024-00529-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has examined the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunctive treatment for antipsychotics, finding mixed results on cognitive, positive, and negative symptoms. We tested if individuals with psychosis have reduced electric field strength compared to healthy controls and assessed the potential causal factors. We hypothesized that either cortical thinning due to the disorder or increased scalp thickness due to secondary effects of the disorder were causal factors. Using the Psychosis Human Connectome Project dataset, we simulated electric field models for 136 individuals with psychosis, 73 first-degree relatives, and 43 healthy controls. We compared group differences of electric field strength at bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), targeted with two montages (Fp1-Fp2 & F3-Fp2) commonly used to treat cognitive impairment. We additionally compared groups on scalp, skull, and cerebrospinal fluid thickness at bilateral dlPFC and the three electrode locations. Mediation analyses assessed if tissue thickness and BMI were causal factors for group differences while controlling for age and sex. Individuals with psychosis had lower electric field strength for bilateral dlPFC for both montages. Scalp thickness was also greater for individuals with psychosis, but cerebrospinal fluid thickness was not significantly different. BMI was a significant mediator for the group difference seen in both scalp thickness and electric field strength. Future treatment studies using tDCS in the psychosis population should include electric field modeling to assess its effectiveness given the increased risk of obesity. Individualized montages based on head models may also improve effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":74758,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":"10 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individuals with psychosis receive less electric field strength during transcranial direct current stimulation compared to healthy controls.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Kazinka, Da Som Choi, Alexander Opitz, Kelvin O Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41537-024-00529-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent research has examined the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunctive treatment for antipsychotics, finding mixed results on cognitive, positive, and negative symptoms. We tested if individuals with psychosis have reduced electric field strength compared to healthy controls and assessed the potential causal factors. We hypothesized that either cortical thinning due to the disorder or increased scalp thickness due to secondary effects of the disorder were causal factors. Using the Psychosis Human Connectome Project dataset, we simulated electric field models for 136 individuals with psychosis, 73 first-degree relatives, and 43 healthy controls. We compared group differences of electric field strength at bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), targeted with two montages (Fp1-Fp2 & F3-Fp2) commonly used to treat cognitive impairment. We additionally compared groups on scalp, skull, and cerebrospinal fluid thickness at bilateral dlPFC and the three electrode locations. Mediation analyses assessed if tissue thickness and BMI were causal factors for group differences while controlling for age and sex. Individuals with psychosis had lower electric field strength for bilateral dlPFC for both montages. Scalp thickness was also greater for individuals with psychosis, but cerebrospinal fluid thickness was not significantly different. BMI was a significant mediator for the group difference seen in both scalp thickness and electric field strength. Future treatment studies using tDCS in the psychosis population should include electric field modeling to assess its effectiveness given the increased risk of obesity. Individualized montages based on head models may also improve effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11579372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-024-00529-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-024-00529-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究考察了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为抗精神病药物辅助治疗的效果,发现其对认知、积极和消极症状的效果不一。我们测试了与健康对照组相比,精神病患者的电场强度是否会降低,并评估了潜在的致病因素。我们假设,精神错乱导致的皮质变薄或精神错乱的继发性影响导致的头皮厚度增加是致病因素。利用 "精神病人类连接组计划 "数据集,我们模拟了 136 名精神病患者、73 名一级亲属和 43 名健康对照者的电场模型。我们比较了双侧背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)的电场强度的组间差异,针对的是两种常用于治疗认知障碍的蒙太奇(Fp1-Fp2 和 F3-Fp2)。此外,我们还比较了各组在双侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)和三个电极位置的头皮、头骨和脑脊液厚度。中介分析评估了组织厚度和体重指数是否是造成组间差异的因果因素,同时控制了年龄和性别。在两个单体中,精神病患者双侧 dlPFC 的电场强度都较低。精神病患者的头皮厚度也更大,但脑脊液厚度没有显著差异。体重指数对头皮厚度和电场强度的组间差异有明显的中介作用。鉴于肥胖风险的增加,未来针对精神病患者使用 tDCS 的治疗研究应包括电场建模,以评估其有效性。基于头部模型的个性化蒙太奇也可提高疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individuals with psychosis receive less electric field strength during transcranial direct current stimulation compared to healthy controls.

Recent research has examined the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunctive treatment for antipsychotics, finding mixed results on cognitive, positive, and negative symptoms. We tested if individuals with psychosis have reduced electric field strength compared to healthy controls and assessed the potential causal factors. We hypothesized that either cortical thinning due to the disorder or increased scalp thickness due to secondary effects of the disorder were causal factors. Using the Psychosis Human Connectome Project dataset, we simulated electric field models for 136 individuals with psychosis, 73 first-degree relatives, and 43 healthy controls. We compared group differences of electric field strength at bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), targeted with two montages (Fp1-Fp2 & F3-Fp2) commonly used to treat cognitive impairment. We additionally compared groups on scalp, skull, and cerebrospinal fluid thickness at bilateral dlPFC and the three electrode locations. Mediation analyses assessed if tissue thickness and BMI were causal factors for group differences while controlling for age and sex. Individuals with psychosis had lower electric field strength for bilateral dlPFC for both montages. Scalp thickness was also greater for individuals with psychosis, but cerebrospinal fluid thickness was not significantly different. BMI was a significant mediator for the group difference seen in both scalp thickness and electric field strength. Future treatment studies using tDCS in the psychosis population should include electric field modeling to assess its effectiveness given the increased risk of obesity. Individualized montages based on head models may also improve effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信