重新评估无症状绝经后患者的子宫内膜厚度以排除癌症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Ryan K W Chee, Reshma M Koshy, Jordan Haidey, Mohammad H Murad, Gavin Low, Mitchell P Wilson
{"title":"重新评估无症状绝经后患者的子宫内膜厚度以排除癌症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ryan K W Chee, Reshma M Koshy, Jordan Haidey, Mohammad H Murad, Gavin Low, Mitchell P Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current ACR and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend a ≤4-mm endometrial thickness threshold for excluding endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to re-evaluate the optimal endometrial thickness threshold on imaging for excluding cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to October 2023 was performed in addition to a gray literature search. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic imaging accuracy of endometrial thickness thresholds for detecting endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients. The reference standard was histopathology. Full-text review and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five studies with 6,302 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age range was 51 to 68 years. The sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals for the 2- to 7-mm thresholds are 95% (84%-98%) and 22% (8%-49%) for ≤2 mm, 94% (82%-98%) and 35% (24%-47%) for ≤3 mm, 95% (86%-98%) and 45% (34%-56%) for ≤4 mm, 88% (75%-95%) and 56% (42%-68%) for ≤5 mm, 84% (63%-94%) and 60% (43%-74%) for ≤6 mm, and 85% (56%-96%) and 62% (49%-73%) for ≤7 mm. Studies were deemed predominantly low risk for bias across domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive meta-analysis supports the ≤4-mm endometrial thickness threshold for excluding endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluating Endometrial Thickness in Symptomatic Postmenopausal Patients for Excluding Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan K W Chee, Reshma M Koshy, Jordan Haidey, Mohammad H Murad, Gavin Low, Mitchell P Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current ACR and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend a ≤4-mm endometrial thickness threshold for excluding endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to re-evaluate the optimal endometrial thickness threshold on imaging for excluding cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to October 2023 was performed in addition to a gray literature search. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic imaging accuracy of endometrial thickness thresholds for detecting endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients. The reference standard was histopathology. Full-text review and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five studies with 6,302 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age range was 51 to 68 years. The sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals for the 2- to 7-mm thresholds are 95% (84%-98%) and 22% (8%-49%) for ≤2 mm, 94% (82%-98%) and 35% (24%-47%) for ≤3 mm, 95% (86%-98%) and 45% (34%-56%) for ≤4 mm, 88% (75%-95%) and 56% (42%-68%) for ≤5 mm, 84% (63%-94%) and 60% (43%-74%) for ≤6 mm, and 85% (56%-96%) and 62% (49%-73%) for ≤7 mm. Studies were deemed predominantly low risk for bias across domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This comprehensive meta-analysis supports the ≤4-mm endometrial thickness threshold for excluding endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.11.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.11.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前的 ACR 和 ACOG 指南建议,无症状绝经后患者排除子宫内膜癌的子宫内膜厚度阈值应≤4 mm。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在重新评估有症状的绝经后患者通过造影排除子宫内膜癌的最佳子宫内膜厚度阈值:除灰色文献检索外,还对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 Scopus 从开始到 2023 年 10 月进行了系统检索。凡是对有症状的绝经后患者检测子宫内膜癌的子宫内膜厚度阈值的诊断准确性进行评估的研究均被纳入。参考标准为组织病理学。全文审阅和数据提取由两名审稿人独立完成。采用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险和适用性。采用双变量混合效应回归模型进行了 Meta 分析:有 35 项研究、6302 名患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 51-68 岁。2-7毫米阈值的敏感性和特异性(95%置信区间)分别为:≤2毫米为95%(84-98%)和22%(8-49%),≤3毫米为94%(82-98%)和35%(24-47%)、95%(86-98%)和 45%(34-56%);≤5 毫米为 88%(75-95%)和 56%(42-68%);≤6 毫米为 84%(63-94%)和 60%(43-74%);≤7 毫米为 85%(56-96%)和 62%(49-73%)。各领域的研究被认为主要存在低偏倚风险:这项综合荟萃分析支持≤4 毫米的子宫内膜厚度阈值,可用于排除无症状绝经后患者的子宫内膜癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-evaluating Endometrial Thickness in Symptomatic Postmenopausal Patients for Excluding Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: The current ACR and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend a ≤4-mm endometrial thickness threshold for excluding endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to re-evaluate the optimal endometrial thickness threshold on imaging for excluding cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to October 2023 was performed in addition to a gray literature search. Studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic imaging accuracy of endometrial thickness thresholds for detecting endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients. The reference standard was histopathology. Full-text review and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model.

Results: Thirty-five studies with 6,302 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age range was 51 to 68 years. The sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals for the 2- to 7-mm thresholds are 95% (84%-98%) and 22% (8%-49%) for ≤2 mm, 94% (82%-98%) and 35% (24%-47%) for ≤3 mm, 95% (86%-98%) and 45% (34%-56%) for ≤4 mm, 88% (75%-95%) and 56% (42%-68%) for ≤5 mm, 84% (63%-94%) and 60% (43%-74%) for ≤6 mm, and 85% (56%-96%) and 62% (49%-73%) for ≤7 mm. Studies were deemed predominantly low risk for bias across domains.

Conclusion: This comprehensive meta-analysis supports the ≤4-mm endometrial thickness threshold for excluding endometrial cancer in symptomatic postmenopausal patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信