{"title":"体育锻炼与体重之间的因果关系:使用澳大利亚纵向数据的最大似然处理效应模型方法。","authors":"Tinh Doan, Liana Leach, Nhan Doan, Lyndall Strazdins","doi":"10.1007/s12529-024-10336-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than two-thirds of Australians are overweight. Existing research based on non-experimental data has primarily established associations, rather than causal inferences, between physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI). PA and BMI likely affect each other, a reciprocal interplay most studies overlook. We investigate the causal relationship between PA and BMI using a quasi-experimental approach to overcome reverse causality bias.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A maximum likelihood treatment effect model, a quasi-experimental method, was employed. Data was from an observational longitudinal dataset of 130,397 observations with 19,677 unique individuals aged 15-64 (52% are females) from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 2006-2019. We first tested for the reverse relationships (whereby overweight limits PA) before estimating the effect of PA on BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first-stage modelling results showed that overweight and obese adults are less likely to engage in PA, as are those resource constrained (time or socioeconomically). In the second modelling stage, there was a clear and significant effect of PA on BMI. Being physically active more than three times a week led to a 2.55-point reduction in BMI (p < 0.001). For women, this effect was more pronounced, with a 2.92-point reduction (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study leverages existing longitudinal data to provide causal estimates of PA on BMI-finding that PA reduces BMI, particularly for women. As many individuals face resource constraints, campaigns to promote behavioural change need to be nuanced and shift some of the responsibility for physically activity from individuals to policy and organizational reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Relationship Between Physical Activity and Body Weight: A Maximum Likelihood Treatment Effect Model Approach Using Australian Longitudinal Data.\",\"authors\":\"Tinh Doan, Liana Leach, Nhan Doan, Lyndall Strazdins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12529-024-10336-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than two-thirds of Australians are overweight. Existing research based on non-experimental data has primarily established associations, rather than causal inferences, between physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI). PA and BMI likely affect each other, a reciprocal interplay most studies overlook. We investigate the causal relationship between PA and BMI using a quasi-experimental approach to overcome reverse causality bias.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A maximum likelihood treatment effect model, a quasi-experimental method, was employed. Data was from an observational longitudinal dataset of 130,397 observations with 19,677 unique individuals aged 15-64 (52% are females) from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 2006-2019. We first tested for the reverse relationships (whereby overweight limits PA) before estimating the effect of PA on BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first-stage modelling results showed that overweight and obese adults are less likely to engage in PA, as are those resource constrained (time or socioeconomically). In the second modelling stage, there was a clear and significant effect of PA on BMI. Being physically active more than three times a week led to a 2.55-point reduction in BMI (p < 0.001). For women, this effect was more pronounced, with a 2.92-point reduction (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study leverages existing longitudinal data to provide causal estimates of PA on BMI-finding that PA reduces BMI, particularly for women. As many individuals face resource constraints, campaigns to promote behavioural change need to be nuanced and shift some of the responsibility for physically activity from individuals to policy and organizational reforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10336-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10336-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:超过三分之二的澳大利亚人超重。基于非实验数据的现有研究主要确定了体力活动(PA)和体重指数(BMI)之间的关联,而非因果推论。体力活动和体重指数可能会相互影响,大多数研究都忽略了这一相互影响的关系。我们采用准实验方法研究 PA 与 BMI 之间的因果关系,以克服反向因果关系偏差:方法:采用最大似然处理效应模型这种准实验方法。数据来自2006-2019年澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查的130,397个观测值的观察性纵向数据集,其中有19,677名15-64岁的独特个体(52%为女性)。我们首先测试了反向关系(超重限制了PA),然后再估算PA对BMI的影响:第一阶段的建模结果显示,超重和肥胖的成年人不太可能参与体育锻炼,而那些资源有限(时间或社会经济条件)的成年人也是如此。在第二阶段建模中,体育锻炼对体重指数有明显和显著的影响。每周进行三次以上的体育锻炼可使体重指数降低 2.55 点(p 结论:体育锻炼对体重指数有明显的影响:这项研究利用现有的纵向数据提供了体育锻炼对体重指数的因果估算,发现体育锻炼能降低体重指数,尤其是对女性而言。由于许多人面临资源限制,促进行为改变的活动需要细致入微,并将身体活动的部分责任从个人转移到政策和组织改革上。
Causal Relationship Between Physical Activity and Body Weight: A Maximum Likelihood Treatment Effect Model Approach Using Australian Longitudinal Data.
Background: More than two-thirds of Australians are overweight. Existing research based on non-experimental data has primarily established associations, rather than causal inferences, between physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI). PA and BMI likely affect each other, a reciprocal interplay most studies overlook. We investigate the causal relationship between PA and BMI using a quasi-experimental approach to overcome reverse causality bias.
Method: A maximum likelihood treatment effect model, a quasi-experimental method, was employed. Data was from an observational longitudinal dataset of 130,397 observations with 19,677 unique individuals aged 15-64 (52% are females) from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 2006-2019. We first tested for the reverse relationships (whereby overweight limits PA) before estimating the effect of PA on BMI.
Results: The first-stage modelling results showed that overweight and obese adults are less likely to engage in PA, as are those resource constrained (time or socioeconomically). In the second modelling stage, there was a clear and significant effect of PA on BMI. Being physically active more than three times a week led to a 2.55-point reduction in BMI (p < 0.001). For women, this effect was more pronounced, with a 2.92-point reduction (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study leverages existing longitudinal data to provide causal estimates of PA on BMI-finding that PA reduces BMI, particularly for women. As many individuals face resource constraints, campaigns to promote behavioural change need to be nuanced and shift some of the responsibility for physically activity from individuals to policy and organizational reforms.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.