{"title":"阿尔巴尼亚语版的奥斯韦特里残疾指数:翻译、跨文化适应性、有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Jasemin Todri, Orges Lena","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the translation, validation, and reliability of the Albanian ODI (ODI-A) version 2.1b.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standardized guidelines for evaluation of psychometric properties were followed. Participants were recruited from a national center with orthopedic-traumatological specialty of an Albanian region. The construct validity, internal consistency, and the reliability of ODI-A measured by seven days test-retest method across two repeated measures were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 200 patients completed the ODI-A 2.1b version: 43% had low back pain, 36% had rheumatoid arthritis as principal diagnosis and the other participants had trauma, luxation, discal hernia, and fractures as diagnosis accompanied by back pain. There were no missing items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.613 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found to be significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ODI-A showed excellent test-retest reliability of each item (ICC = 0.707-0.959). Cronbach's <i>α</i> for the first completion was 0.684, ICC for ODI-A was 0.629, the SEM was 1.701, and MDC<sub>95%</sub> was 4.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ODI-A, adapted from a linguistic and cultural perspective, meets validity and reliability requirements necessary for its use in the Albanian population with back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.\",\"authors\":\"Jasemin Todri, Orges Lena\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the translation, validation, and reliability of the Albanian ODI (ODI-A) version 2.1b.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standardized guidelines for evaluation of psychometric properties were followed. Participants were recruited from a national center with orthopedic-traumatological specialty of an Albanian region. The construct validity, internal consistency, and the reliability of ODI-A measured by seven days test-retest method across two repeated measures were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 200 patients completed the ODI-A 2.1b version: 43% had low back pain, 36% had rheumatoid arthritis as principal diagnosis and the other participants had trauma, luxation, discal hernia, and fractures as diagnosis accompanied by back pain. There were no missing items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.613 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found to be significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ODI-A showed excellent test-retest reliability of each item (ICC = 0.707-0.959). Cronbach's <i>α</i> for the first completion was 0.684, ICC for ODI-A was 0.629, the SEM was 1.701, and MDC<sub>95%</sub> was 4.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ODI-A, adapted from a linguistic and cultural perspective, meets validity and reliability requirements necessary for its use in the Albanian population with back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the translation, validation, and reliability of the Albanian ODI (ODI-A) version 2.1b.
Methods: Standardized guidelines for evaluation of psychometric properties were followed. Participants were recruited from a national center with orthopedic-traumatological specialty of an Albanian region. The construct validity, internal consistency, and the reliability of ODI-A measured by seven days test-retest method across two repeated measures were considered.
Results: In total, 200 patients completed the ODI-A 2.1b version: 43% had low back pain, 36% had rheumatoid arthritis as principal diagnosis and the other participants had trauma, luxation, discal hernia, and fractures as diagnosis accompanied by back pain. There were no missing items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.613 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found to be significant (p < 0.001). ODI-A showed excellent test-retest reliability of each item (ICC = 0.707-0.959). Cronbach's α for the first completion was 0.684, ICC for ODI-A was 0.629, the SEM was 1.701, and MDC95% was 4.71.
Conclusions: ODI-A, adapted from a linguistic and cultural perspective, meets validity and reliability requirements necessary for its use in the Albanian population with back pain.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.