等待呼气:肿瘤患者出院后进行家庭血氧监测的可行性和适宜性。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00182
Si-Yang Liu, Sahil D Doshi, AnnMarie Mazzella Ebstein, Jessie Holland, Ayelet Sapir, Micheal Leung, Jennie Huang, Rosanna Fahy, Rori Salvaggio, Aaron Begue, Gilad Kuperman, Fernanda G C Polubriaginof, Peter D Stetson, Jun J Mao, Katherine Panageas, Bob Li, Bobby Daly
{"title":"等待呼气:肿瘤患者出院后进行家庭血氧监测的可行性和适宜性。","authors":"Si-Yang Liu, Sahil D Doshi, AnnMarie Mazzella Ebstein, Jessie Holland, Ayelet Sapir, Micheal Leung, Jennie Huang, Rosanna Fahy, Rori Salvaggio, Aaron Begue, Gilad Kuperman, Fernanda G C Polubriaginof, Peter D Stetson, Jun J Mao, Katherine Panageas, Bob Li, Bobby Daly","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulse oximetry remote patient monitoring (RPM) post-hospital discharge increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as patients and providers sought to limit in-person encounters and provide more care in the home. However, there is limited evidence on the feasibility and appropriateness of pulse oximetry RPM in patients with cancer after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This feasibility study enrolled oncology patients discharged after an unexpected admission at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from October 2020 to July 2021. Patients were asked to measure their blood oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) level daily during the hours of 9 am-5 pm during a 10-day monitoring period posthospitalization. An automated system alerted clinicians to blood O<sub>2</sub> levels below 93.0%. We evaluated the feasibility (>50.0% of patients providing at least one measurement from home) and appropriateness (>50.0% of alerts leading to a clinically meaningful patient interaction) of pulse oximetry RPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study, with 53.2% female patients and a median age of 68 years. The most prevalent malignancy was thoracic (62.9%). The feasibility metric was met, with 45 patients (72.6%, 45 of 62) providing blood O<sub>2</sub> levels at least once during the 10-day monitoring program. The appropriateness threshold was not met; of the 121 alerts, only 39.7% (48 alerts) was linked to a clinically meaningful interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This feasibility study showed that while patients with cancer were willing to measure blood O<sub>2</sub> levels at home, most alerts did not result in meaningful clinical interactions. There is a need for improved patient support systems and logistical infrastructure to support appropriate use of RPM at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waiting to Exhale: The Feasibility and Appropriateness of Home Blood Oxygen Monitoring in Oncology Patients Post-Hospital Discharge.\",\"authors\":\"Si-Yang Liu, Sahil D Doshi, AnnMarie Mazzella Ebstein, Jessie Holland, Ayelet Sapir, Micheal Leung, Jennie Huang, Rosanna Fahy, Rori Salvaggio, Aaron Begue, Gilad Kuperman, Fernanda G C Polubriaginof, Peter D Stetson, Jun J Mao, Katherine Panageas, Bob Li, Bobby Daly\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI-24-00182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pulse oximetry remote patient monitoring (RPM) post-hospital discharge increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as patients and providers sought to limit in-person encounters and provide more care in the home. However, there is limited evidence on the feasibility and appropriateness of pulse oximetry RPM in patients with cancer after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This feasibility study enrolled oncology patients discharged after an unexpected admission at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from October 2020 to July 2021. Patients were asked to measure their blood oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) level daily during the hours of 9 am-5 pm during a 10-day monitoring period posthospitalization. An automated system alerted clinicians to blood O<sub>2</sub> levels below 93.0%. We evaluated the feasibility (>50.0% of patients providing at least one measurement from home) and appropriateness (>50.0% of alerts leading to a clinically meaningful patient interaction) of pulse oximetry RPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study, with 53.2% female patients and a median age of 68 years. The most prevalent malignancy was thoracic (62.9%). The feasibility metric was met, with 45 patients (72.6%, 45 of 62) providing blood O<sub>2</sub> levels at least once during the 10-day monitoring program. The appropriateness threshold was not met; of the 121 alerts, only 39.7% (48 alerts) was linked to a clinically meaningful interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This feasibility study showed that while patients with cancer were willing to measure blood O<sub>2</sub> levels at home, most alerts did not result in meaningful clinical interactions. There is a need for improved patient support systems and logistical infrastructure to support appropriate use of RPM at home.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,出院后脉搏血氧仪远程患者监护 (RPM) 有所增加,因为患者和医疗服务提供者都在努力限制面对面的接触,并在家中提供更多的护理服务。然而,有关癌症患者出院后使用脉搏血氧仪进行远程患者监护的可行性和适宜性的证据却很有限:这项可行性研究招募了 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 7 月期间在纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心意外入院后出院的肿瘤患者。要求患者在出院后的 10 天监测期内,每天上午 9 点至下午 5 点测量血氧 (O2) 水平。当血氧水平低于 93.0% 时,自动系统会向临床医生发出警报。我们评估了脉搏血氧仪 RPM 的可行性(>50.0% 的患者至少在家中进行了一次测量)和适当性(>50.0% 的警报导致了有临床意义的患者互动):研究共招募了 62 名患者,其中女性患者占 53.2%,中位年龄为 68 岁。最常见的恶性肿瘤是胸部肿瘤(62.9%)。有 45 名患者(62 人中有 45 人,占 72.6%)在为期 10 天的监测计划中至少提供了一次血氧水平,达到了可行性指标。未达到适当性阈值;在 121 次警报中,只有 39.7% (48 次警报)与有临床意义的互动相关联:这项可行性研究表明,虽然癌症患者愿意在家中测量血氧水平,但大多数警报并未产生有意义的临床互动。有必要改进患者支持系统和后勤基础设施,以支持在家中适当使用 RPM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Waiting to Exhale: The Feasibility and Appropriateness of Home Blood Oxygen Monitoring in Oncology Patients Post-Hospital Discharge.

Purpose: Pulse oximetry remote patient monitoring (RPM) post-hospital discharge increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as patients and providers sought to limit in-person encounters and provide more care in the home. However, there is limited evidence on the feasibility and appropriateness of pulse oximetry RPM in patients with cancer after hospital discharge.

Methods and materials: This feasibility study enrolled oncology patients discharged after an unexpected admission at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from October 2020 to July 2021. Patients were asked to measure their blood oxygen (O2) level daily during the hours of 9 am-5 pm during a 10-day monitoring period posthospitalization. An automated system alerted clinicians to blood O2 levels below 93.0%. We evaluated the feasibility (>50.0% of patients providing at least one measurement from home) and appropriateness (>50.0% of alerts leading to a clinically meaningful patient interaction) of pulse oximetry RPM.

Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled in the study, with 53.2% female patients and a median age of 68 years. The most prevalent malignancy was thoracic (62.9%). The feasibility metric was met, with 45 patients (72.6%, 45 of 62) providing blood O2 levels at least once during the 10-day monitoring program. The appropriateness threshold was not met; of the 121 alerts, only 39.7% (48 alerts) was linked to a clinically meaningful interaction.

Conclusion: This feasibility study showed that while patients with cancer were willing to measure blood O2 levels at home, most alerts did not result in meaningful clinical interactions. There is a need for improved patient support systems and logistical infrastructure to support appropriate use of RPM at home.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信