评估内镜射频消融治疗恶性胆道梗阻的安全性和不良事件。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241294002
Hayat Khizar, Yufei Hu, Weigang Gu, Jin Yang, Hangbin Jin, Xiayin He, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang
{"title":"评估内镜射频消融治疗恶性胆道梗阻的安全性和不良事件。","authors":"Hayat Khizar, Yufei Hu, Weigang Gu, Jin Yang, Hangbin Jin, Xiayin He, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang","doi":"10.1177/17562848241294002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used for the treatment of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). The postoperative adverse events associated with RFA treatment have gained importance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the early adverse events and their risk factors associated with RFA for the treatment of MBO.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from patients diagnosed with MBO and treated with endoscopic RFA at our hospital between January 2010 and June 2022. Based on the collected data, the patients were divided into two groups: the adverse event group and the nonadverse event group. Early postoperative adverse events were recorded, and risk factors were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty patients with MBO underwent endoscopic RFA, with 20 developing adverse events (16.6%; 20/120). Among these, 13 patients (10.8%) developed biliary infection after RFA treatment, while 7 (5.8%) developed acute pancreatitis, and no bleeding or perforation occurred. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, bile duct stricture length >2.5 cm, segmental RFA, and the proportion of patients receiving single stent drainage were all significantly greater in the adverse event group compared to the nonadverse event group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that type 2 diabetes, segmental RFA, and single stent drainage were the three independent risk factors for getting a biliary infection after RFA therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unresectable MBO combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus, segmental RFA, and postoperative single stent drainage can be the risk factors for adverse events after RFA. More attention should be paid to patients with multiple risk factors and preventive measures should be taken.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562848241294002"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of safety and adverse events in endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Hayat Khizar, Yufei Hu, Weigang Gu, Jin Yang, Hangbin Jin, Xiayin He, Xiaofeng Zhang, Jianfeng Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848241294002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used for the treatment of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). The postoperative adverse events associated with RFA treatment have gained importance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the early adverse events and their risk factors associated with RFA for the treatment of MBO.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from patients diagnosed with MBO and treated with endoscopic RFA at our hospital between January 2010 and June 2022. Based on the collected data, the patients were divided into two groups: the adverse event group and the nonadverse event group. Early postoperative adverse events were recorded, and risk factors were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty patients with MBO underwent endoscopic RFA, with 20 developing adverse events (16.6%; 20/120). Among these, 13 patients (10.8%) developed biliary infection after RFA treatment, while 7 (5.8%) developed acute pancreatitis, and no bleeding or perforation occurred. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, bile duct stricture length >2.5 cm, segmental RFA, and the proportion of patients receiving single stent drainage were all significantly greater in the adverse event group compared to the nonadverse event group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that type 2 diabetes, segmental RFA, and single stent drainage were the three independent risk factors for getting a biliary infection after RFA therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unresectable MBO combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus, segmental RFA, and postoperative single stent drainage can be the risk factors for adverse events after RFA. More attention should be paid to patients with multiple risk factors and preventive measures should be taken.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17562848241294002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241294002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241294002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜射频消融术(RFA)用于治疗无法切除的恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)。与 RFA 治疗相关的术后不良事件日益受到重视:调查与RFA治疗MBO相关的早期不良事件及其风险因素:观察性回顾研究:我们收集了 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在我院确诊为 MBO 并接受内镜 RFA 治疗的患者的数据。根据收集的数据,将患者分为两组:不良事件组和非不良事件组。记录术后早期不良事件,评估风险因素:结果:120 名 MBO 患者接受了内窥镜 RFA,其中 20 人发生了不良事件(16.6%;20/120)。其中,13 名患者(10.8%)在 RFA 治疗后发生胆道感染,7 名患者(5.8%)发生急性胰腺炎,没有发生出血或穿孔。与非不良事件组相比,不良事件组中 2 型糖尿病、胆管狭窄长度大于 2.5 厘米、分段 RFA 和接受单支架引流的患者比例均显著增加(P不可切除的 MBO 合并 2 型糖尿病、分段 RFA 和术后单支架引流可能是 RFA 术后不良事件的风险因素。应更加关注具有多种风险因素的患者,并采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of safety and adverse events in endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction.

Background: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is used for the treatment of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). The postoperative adverse events associated with RFA treatment have gained importance.

Objective: To investigate the early adverse events and their risk factors associated with RFA for the treatment of MBO.

Design: Observational retrospective study.

Methods: We collected data from patients diagnosed with MBO and treated with endoscopic RFA at our hospital between January 2010 and June 2022. Based on the collected data, the patients were divided into two groups: the adverse event group and the nonadverse event group. Early postoperative adverse events were recorded, and risk factors were assessed.

Results: One hundred and twenty patients with MBO underwent endoscopic RFA, with 20 developing adverse events (16.6%; 20/120). Among these, 13 patients (10.8%) developed biliary infection after RFA treatment, while 7 (5.8%) developed acute pancreatitis, and no bleeding or perforation occurred. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, bile duct stricture length >2.5 cm, segmental RFA, and the proportion of patients receiving single stent drainage were all significantly greater in the adverse event group compared to the nonadverse event group (p < 0.05). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that type 2 diabetes, segmental RFA, and single stent drainage were the three independent risk factors for getting a biliary infection after RFA therapy.

Conclusion: Unresectable MBO combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus, segmental RFA, and postoperative single stent drainage can be the risk factors for adverse events after RFA. More attention should be paid to patients with multiple risk factors and preventive measures should be taken.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信