使用 BeBack™ 穿刺导管,通过胫动脉入路对下肢慢性完全闭塞症进行经皮再通。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1177/17085381241302572
Boris Khaitovitch, Israel Cohen, Efrat K Gilat, Daniel Silverberg, Moshe Halak, Daniel Raskin
{"title":"使用 BeBack™ 穿刺导管,通过胫动脉入路对下肢慢性完全闭塞症进行经皮再通。","authors":"Boris Khaitovitch, Israel Cohen, Efrat K Gilat, Daniel Silverberg, Moshe Halak, Daniel Raskin","doi":"10.1177/17085381241302572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the BeBack™ crossing catheter for percutaneous recanalization of lower limb chronic total occlusions (CTO) via tibial artery access in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study included 21 patients who underwent 22 limb recanalization procedures between May 2021 and April 2024. The BeBack™ catheter was utilized after traditional methods of recanalization failed. Patients aged 18 years or older with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and treated exclusively through the tibialis anterior artery were included. Data on demographics, occlusion characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected from hospital records. Procedural success was defined as achieving less than 30% residual stenosis and an improvement in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) by at least 0.2 within 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 77 years (IQR 73-81.5), with the majority being male (71%). Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases (21/22), and procedural success was achieved in 91% (20/22) cases. The device was primarily used for re-entry (77%), with a minority of cases (23%) where it was used as a crossing device. The most frequently treated artery was the superficial femoral artery (95%). One procedural failure was noted due to an inability to traverse a heavily calcified occlusion. Complications included one case of intra-procedural acute thrombosis, which was resolved, and one instance of post-procedural pulmonary edema, treated with diuretics. No reinterventions or amputations were required during the 30-day follow-up, although there were three mortalities (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BeBack™ crossing catheter demonstrated high technical success and a low complication rate for recanalizing lower limb CTOs via a single tibial artery access. These findings suggest that the BeBack™ catheter could be an effective and safe option for managing complex CTOs, particularly when traditional approaches are not feasible. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and compare them with other crossing and re-entry devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381241302572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous recanalization of lower limb chronic total occlusions via tibial artery access using the BeBack™ crossing catheter.\",\"authors\":\"Boris Khaitovitch, Israel Cohen, Efrat K Gilat, Daniel Silverberg, Moshe Halak, Daniel Raskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381241302572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the BeBack™ crossing catheter for percutaneous recanalization of lower limb chronic total occlusions (CTO) via tibial artery access in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study included 21 patients who underwent 22 limb recanalization procedures between May 2021 and April 2024. The BeBack™ catheter was utilized after traditional methods of recanalization failed. Patients aged 18 years or older with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and treated exclusively through the tibialis anterior artery were included. Data on demographics, occlusion characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected from hospital records. Procedural success was defined as achieving less than 30% residual stenosis and an improvement in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) by at least 0.2 within 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 77 years (IQR 73-81.5), with the majority being male (71%). Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases (21/22), and procedural success was achieved in 91% (20/22) cases. The device was primarily used for re-entry (77%), with a minority of cases (23%) where it was used as a crossing device. The most frequently treated artery was the superficial femoral artery (95%). One procedural failure was noted due to an inability to traverse a heavily calcified occlusion. Complications included one case of intra-procedural acute thrombosis, which was resolved, and one instance of post-procedural pulmonary edema, treated with diuretics. No reinterventions or amputations were required during the 30-day follow-up, although there were three mortalities (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BeBack™ crossing catheter demonstrated high technical success and a low complication rate for recanalizing lower limb CTOs via a single tibial artery access. These findings suggest that the BeBack™ catheter could be an effective and safe option for managing complex CTOs, particularly when traditional approaches are not feasible. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and compare them with other crossing and re-entry devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17085381241302572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241302572\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241302572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的该研究旨在评估 BeBack™ 交叉导管经皮再通下肢慢性全闭塞(CTO)的安全性和有效性:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 21 名患者,他们在 2021 年 5 月至 2024 年 4 月期间接受了 22 次肢体再通手术。BeBack™导管是在传统再通方法失败后使用的。这些患者年龄在 18 岁或以上,患有外周动脉疾病 (PAD),并且只接受了胫骨前动脉治疗。从医院记录中收集了有关人口统计学、闭塞特征、手术细节和结果的数据。手术成功的定义是残余狭窄小于30%,且在24小时内踝肱指数(ABI)改善至少0.2:患者年龄中位数为 77 岁(IQR 73-81.5),大多数为男性(71%)。95%的病例(21/22)取得了技术成功,91%的病例(20/22)取得了手术成功。该装置主要用于再入路(77%),少数病例(23%)用作交叉装置。最常治疗的动脉是股浅动脉(95%)。有一例手术失败是由于无法穿越严重钙化的闭塞。并发症包括一例术中急性血栓形成(已治愈)和一例术后肺水肿(用利尿剂治疗)。在30天的随访期间,虽然有三例死亡病例(14%),但没有人需要再次手术或截肢:结论:BeBack™ 穿刺导管在通过单一胫骨动脉入路对下肢 CTO 进行再通路时,技术成功率高,并发症发生率低。这些研究结果表明,BeBack™ 导管是治疗复杂 CTO 的有效而安全的选择,尤其是在传统方法不可行的情况下。还需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些结果,并将其与其他穿越和再入设备进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous recanalization of lower limb chronic total occlusions via tibial artery access using the BeBack™ crossing catheter.

Objectives: The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the BeBack™ crossing catheter for percutaneous recanalization of lower limb chronic total occlusions (CTO) via tibial artery access in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 21 patients who underwent 22 limb recanalization procedures between May 2021 and April 2024. The BeBack™ catheter was utilized after traditional methods of recanalization failed. Patients aged 18 years or older with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and treated exclusively through the tibialis anterior artery were included. Data on demographics, occlusion characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected from hospital records. Procedural success was defined as achieving less than 30% residual stenosis and an improvement in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) by at least 0.2 within 24 h.

Results: The median patient age was 77 years (IQR 73-81.5), with the majority being male (71%). Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases (21/22), and procedural success was achieved in 91% (20/22) cases. The device was primarily used for re-entry (77%), with a minority of cases (23%) where it was used as a crossing device. The most frequently treated artery was the superficial femoral artery (95%). One procedural failure was noted due to an inability to traverse a heavily calcified occlusion. Complications included one case of intra-procedural acute thrombosis, which was resolved, and one instance of post-procedural pulmonary edema, treated with diuretics. No reinterventions or amputations were required during the 30-day follow-up, although there were three mortalities (14%).

Conclusions: The BeBack™ crossing catheter demonstrated high technical success and a low complication rate for recanalizing lower limb CTOs via a single tibial artery access. These findings suggest that the BeBack™ catheter could be an effective and safe option for managing complex CTOs, particularly when traditional approaches are not feasible. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and compare them with other crossing and re-entry devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信