Jonathan D Winter, J William Kerns, Danya M Qato, Katherine M Winter, Nicole Brandt, Linda Wastila, Christopher Winter, Yu-Hua Fu, Eposi Elonge, Alex H Krist, Sarah R Reves, Rebecca S Etz
{"title":"疗养院临床医生调查,解释加巴喷丁诺类药物增加的原因。","authors":"Jonathan D Winter, J William Kerns, Danya M Qato, Katherine M Winter, Nicole Brandt, Linda Wastila, Christopher Winter, Yu-Hua Fu, Eposi Elonge, Alex H Krist, Sarah R Reves, Rebecca S Etz","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survey nursing home (NH) clinicians about the indications for NH gabapentinoid use, the factors driving increased prescribing, and their experiences with gabapentinoid deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Online clinician survey.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>NH clinicians prescribing gabapentinoids in US NHs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey of NH prescribers was conducted using SurveyMonkey from March 15 to July 1, 2024. Recruitment employed crowdsourcing, targeting the membership of NH clinician organizations. A multidisciplinary team developed the instrument. Content focused on the magnitude of gabapentinoid prescribing for different, previously identified, indications, as well as clinician deprescribing experiences and perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two self-identified NH prescribers participated: 76% White, 55% female, 77% physicians. One-third had geriatric training certifications. Most NH gabapentinoids were started in other care settings by non-NH clinicians. Gabapentinoid prescribing initiated in NHs was principally off-label for pain syndromes. Although prescribing solely for psycho-behavioral symptoms was rare, most clinicians reported that gabapentinoids have some utility in treating these symptoms and consequently may be preferred over alternative analgesics when psycho-behavioral symptoms coexist with pain. Gabapentinoid deprescribing occurs infrequently and is deprioritized relative to opioid reduction efforts. Most clinicians acknowledged potential gabapentinoid side effects; however, severe harms were rarely observed, and half agreed that gabapentinoids are generally safe and well-tolerated. Seventy-nine percent perceive gabapentinoids as safer and better tolerated than opioids, 57% than benzodiazepines, and 40% than antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>An opportunity exists to increase NH safety by prioritizing gabapentinoid gradual dose reduction requirements. Because so many prescriptions originate outside NHs, any reduction effort should emphasize deprescribing across all care settings. Clinicians' perceptions of gabapentinoids as reasonable but unmonitored alternatives to opioids and psychotropics contribute to their increased use. Safety and efficacy data supporting such prescribing for nonapproved indications in NHs is lacking. Existing NH psychotropic reporting and reduction mandates should include gabapentinoids regardless of indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105363"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Nursing Home Clinician Survey to Explain Gabapentinoid Increases.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan D Winter, J William Kerns, Danya M Qato, Katherine M Winter, Nicole Brandt, Linda Wastila, Christopher Winter, Yu-Hua Fu, Eposi Elonge, Alex H Krist, Sarah R Reves, Rebecca S Etz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survey nursing home (NH) clinicians about the indications for NH gabapentinoid use, the factors driving increased prescribing, and their experiences with gabapentinoid deprescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Online clinician survey.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>NH clinicians prescribing gabapentinoids in US NHs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey of NH prescribers was conducted using SurveyMonkey from March 15 to July 1, 2024. Recruitment employed crowdsourcing, targeting the membership of NH clinician organizations. A multidisciplinary team developed the instrument. Content focused on the magnitude of gabapentinoid prescribing for different, previously identified, indications, as well as clinician deprescribing experiences and perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two self-identified NH prescribers participated: 76% White, 55% female, 77% physicians. One-third had geriatric training certifications. Most NH gabapentinoids were started in other care settings by non-NH clinicians. Gabapentinoid prescribing initiated in NHs was principally off-label for pain syndromes. Although prescribing solely for psycho-behavioral symptoms was rare, most clinicians reported that gabapentinoids have some utility in treating these symptoms and consequently may be preferred over alternative analgesics when psycho-behavioral symptoms coexist with pain. Gabapentinoid deprescribing occurs infrequently and is deprioritized relative to opioid reduction efforts. Most clinicians acknowledged potential gabapentinoid side effects; however, severe harms were rarely observed, and half agreed that gabapentinoids are generally safe and well-tolerated. Seventy-nine percent perceive gabapentinoids as safer and better tolerated than opioids, 57% than benzodiazepines, and 40% than antipsychotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>An opportunity exists to increase NH safety by prioritizing gabapentinoid gradual dose reduction requirements. Because so many prescriptions originate outside NHs, any reduction effort should emphasize deprescribing across all care settings. Clinicians' perceptions of gabapentinoids as reasonable but unmonitored alternatives to opioids and psychotropics contribute to their increased use. Safety and efficacy data supporting such prescribing for nonapproved indications in NHs is lacking. Existing NH psychotropic reporting and reduction mandates should include gabapentinoids regardless of indication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105363\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Nursing Home Clinician Survey to Explain Gabapentinoid Increases.
Objectives: Survey nursing home (NH) clinicians about the indications for NH gabapentinoid use, the factors driving increased prescribing, and their experiences with gabapentinoid deprescribing.
Design: Online clinician survey.
Setting and participants: NH clinicians prescribing gabapentinoids in US NHs.
Methods: An anonymous survey of NH prescribers was conducted using SurveyMonkey from March 15 to July 1, 2024. Recruitment employed crowdsourcing, targeting the membership of NH clinician organizations. A multidisciplinary team developed the instrument. Content focused on the magnitude of gabapentinoid prescribing for different, previously identified, indications, as well as clinician deprescribing experiences and perspectives.
Results: Sixty-two self-identified NH prescribers participated: 76% White, 55% female, 77% physicians. One-third had geriatric training certifications. Most NH gabapentinoids were started in other care settings by non-NH clinicians. Gabapentinoid prescribing initiated in NHs was principally off-label for pain syndromes. Although prescribing solely for psycho-behavioral symptoms was rare, most clinicians reported that gabapentinoids have some utility in treating these symptoms and consequently may be preferred over alternative analgesics when psycho-behavioral symptoms coexist with pain. Gabapentinoid deprescribing occurs infrequently and is deprioritized relative to opioid reduction efforts. Most clinicians acknowledged potential gabapentinoid side effects; however, severe harms were rarely observed, and half agreed that gabapentinoids are generally safe and well-tolerated. Seventy-nine percent perceive gabapentinoids as safer and better tolerated than opioids, 57% than benzodiazepines, and 40% than antipsychotics.
Conclusions and implications: An opportunity exists to increase NH safety by prioritizing gabapentinoid gradual dose reduction requirements. Because so many prescriptions originate outside NHs, any reduction effort should emphasize deprescribing across all care settings. Clinicians' perceptions of gabapentinoids as reasonable but unmonitored alternatives to opioids and psychotropics contribute to their increased use. Safety and efficacy data supporting such prescribing for nonapproved indications in NHs is lacking. Existing NH psychotropic reporting and reduction mandates should include gabapentinoids regardless of indication.
期刊介绍:
JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates.
The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality