探索物理治疗人员对急性中风康复中物理治疗服务的看法。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jimmy James, Damian Purcell, Mark P McGlinchey
{"title":"探索物理治疗人员对急性中风康复中物理治疗服务的看法。","authors":"Jimmy James, Damian Purcell, Mark P McGlinchey","doi":"10.1177/02692155241300091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore physiotherapists' perspectives on current and alternative models of physiotherapy delivery in acute stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative service evaluation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An acute stroke rehabilitation unit within a London teaching hospital in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A purposive sample of 17 physiotherapy staff (qualified physiotherapists and physiotherapy support staff) working in the acute stroke rehabilitation unit at the time of, or in the previous 3 months of the study were recruited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified: barriers to effective physiotherapy delivery, enablers of effective physiotherapy delivery, and alternative models of physiotherapy delivery. Themes were framed by the concept of providing effective and efficient physiotherapy guided by reflection. Main barriers included patients not being ready for and underutilisation of time within physiotherapy sessions. Use of timetabling and access to senior therapy support enabled more effective and efficient physiotherapy delivery. Alternative models to optimise physiotherapy delivery included different staff to patient ratios, group therapy, opportunistic physiotherapy delivery and self-management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several enablers of and barriers to providing effective and efficient physiotherapy post-stroke exist. Physiotherapists should consider implementing alternative models of physiotherapy delivery to increase the amount of physiotherapy provided to patients' post-stroke, thereby facilitating post-stroke functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241300091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring physiotherapy staff's perceptions of physiotherapy delivery in acute stroke rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Jimmy James, Damian Purcell, Mark P McGlinchey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241300091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore physiotherapists' perspectives on current and alternative models of physiotherapy delivery in acute stroke rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative service evaluation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An acute stroke rehabilitation unit within a London teaching hospital in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A purposive sample of 17 physiotherapy staff (qualified physiotherapists and physiotherapy support staff) working in the acute stroke rehabilitation unit at the time of, or in the previous 3 months of the study were recruited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified: barriers to effective physiotherapy delivery, enablers of effective physiotherapy delivery, and alternative models of physiotherapy delivery. Themes were framed by the concept of providing effective and efficient physiotherapy guided by reflection. Main barriers included patients not being ready for and underutilisation of time within physiotherapy sessions. Use of timetabling and access to senior therapy support enabled more effective and efficient physiotherapy delivery. Alternative models to optimise physiotherapy delivery included different staff to patient ratios, group therapy, opportunistic physiotherapy delivery and self-management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several enablers of and barriers to providing effective and efficient physiotherapy post-stroke exist. Physiotherapists should consider implementing alternative models of physiotherapy delivery to increase the amount of physiotherapy provided to patients' post-stroke, thereby facilitating post-stroke functional recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692155241300091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241300091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241300091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要探讨物理治疗师对急性中风康复中物理治疗服务的现有模式和替代模式的看法:设计:定性服务评估:地点: 英国伦敦一家教学医院的急性中风康复科:有目的性地招募了 17 名物理治疗人员(合格的物理治疗师和物理治疗辅助人员)参与研究:研究确定了三个主题:有效提供物理治疗的障碍、有效提供物理治疗的促进因素和提供物理治疗的替代模式。这些主题都是以在反思的指导下提供有效和高效的物理治疗这一概念为框架的。主要障碍包括患者没有准备好接受物理治疗和物理治疗时间利用不足。使用时间安排表和获得高级治疗支持可以提高物理治疗的效果和效率。优化物理治疗的其他模式包括不同的工作人员与患者比例、小组治疗、机会性物理治疗和自我管理:结论:脑卒中后物理治疗的有效性和高效性既有促进因素,也有障碍因素。物理治疗师应考虑采用其他物理治疗模式,以增加为脑卒中后患者提供的物理治疗量,从而促进脑卒中后的功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring physiotherapy staff's perceptions of physiotherapy delivery in acute stroke rehabilitation.

Objective: To explore physiotherapists' perspectives on current and alternative models of physiotherapy delivery in acute stroke rehabilitation.

Design: Qualitative service evaluation.

Setting: An acute stroke rehabilitation unit within a London teaching hospital in the UK.

Participants: A purposive sample of 17 physiotherapy staff (qualified physiotherapists and physiotherapy support staff) working in the acute stroke rehabilitation unit at the time of, or in the previous 3 months of the study were recruited to participate.

Results: Three themes were identified: barriers to effective physiotherapy delivery, enablers of effective physiotherapy delivery, and alternative models of physiotherapy delivery. Themes were framed by the concept of providing effective and efficient physiotherapy guided by reflection. Main barriers included patients not being ready for and underutilisation of time within physiotherapy sessions. Use of timetabling and access to senior therapy support enabled more effective and efficient physiotherapy delivery. Alternative models to optimise physiotherapy delivery included different staff to patient ratios, group therapy, opportunistic physiotherapy delivery and self-management.

Conclusions: Several enablers of and barriers to providing effective and efficient physiotherapy post-stroke exist. Physiotherapists should consider implementing alternative models of physiotherapy delivery to increase the amount of physiotherapy provided to patients' post-stroke, thereby facilitating post-stroke functional recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信