在急诊科急诊气管插管中使用视频喉镜与直接喉镜的结果:倾向得分匹配分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Triratana Kongsawaddee, Kumpol Kornthatchapong, Winchana Srivilaithon
{"title":"在急诊科急诊气管插管中使用视频喉镜与直接喉镜的结果:倾向得分匹配分析。","authors":"Triratana Kongsawaddee, Kumpol Kornthatchapong, Winchana Srivilaithon","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01136-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high incidence of airway management failure in the emergency department (ED) necessitates a comparative analysis of laryngoscopy methods. This study aims to compare the success and complications associated with video-assisted laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in emergency tracheal intubation in ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the ED of Thammasat University Hospital. It involved adult patients undergoing emergency tracheal intubation using either VL (GlideScope<sup>®</sup>) or DL (Macintosh<sup>®</sup>). The outcomes assessed were success rates of intubation and occurrence of peri-intubation adverse events. Propensity score matching and multivariable risk regression analysis were employed for statistical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 3,424 patients, with 342 in the VL group and 3,082 in the DL group. The initial analysis revealed no significant differences in the intubation success rates between the two methods. However, the VL group experienced fewer peri-intubation adverse events (33% compared to 40%). After propensity score matching, a higher first-attempt success rate was observed in the DL group (88.9% vs. 81.3%, risk difference: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.9 to 13.2, p=0.009), but there was no statistically significant difference in peri-intubation adverse events. VL had a lower first-attempt success rate among low-experience intubators. Subgroup analyses of intubators with moderate and high experience, as well as patients who received both induction agents and neuromuscular blocking agents, show results consistent with the analysis of the entire cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both VL and DL have comparable first-attempt success rates and peri-intubation adverse events. VL is particularly beneficial when used by moderately or highly experienced intubator. The choice of intubation method, combined with clinical experience and technique plays a critical role in the success and safety of emergency intubations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency tracheal intubation in emergency department: a propensity score matching analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Triratana Kongsawaddee, Kumpol Kornthatchapong, Winchana Srivilaithon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-024-01136-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The high incidence of airway management failure in the emergency department (ED) necessitates a comparative analysis of laryngoscopy methods. This study aims to compare the success and complications associated with video-assisted laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in emergency tracheal intubation in ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the ED of Thammasat University Hospital. It involved adult patients undergoing emergency tracheal intubation using either VL (GlideScope<sup>®</sup>) or DL (Macintosh<sup>®</sup>). The outcomes assessed were success rates of intubation and occurrence of peri-intubation adverse events. Propensity score matching and multivariable risk regression analysis were employed for statistical evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 3,424 patients, with 342 in the VL group and 3,082 in the DL group. The initial analysis revealed no significant differences in the intubation success rates between the two methods. However, the VL group experienced fewer peri-intubation adverse events (33% compared to 40%). After propensity score matching, a higher first-attempt success rate was observed in the DL group (88.9% vs. 81.3%, risk difference: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.9 to 13.2, p=0.009), but there was no statistically significant difference in peri-intubation adverse events. VL had a lower first-attempt success rate among low-experience intubators. Subgroup analyses of intubators with moderate and high experience, as well as patients who received both induction agents and neuromuscular blocking agents, show results consistent with the analysis of the entire cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both VL and DL have comparable first-attempt success rates and peri-intubation adverse events. VL is particularly beneficial when used by moderately or highly experienced intubator. The choice of intubation method, combined with clinical experience and technique plays a critical role in the success and safety of emergency intubations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01136-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01136-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)气道管理失败的发生率很高,因此有必要对喉镜检查方法进行比较分析。本研究旨在比较视频辅助喉镜检查(VL)和直接喉镜检查(DL)在急诊科气管插管中的成功率和相关并发症:这项回顾性队列研究在 Thammasat 大学医院急诊科进行。研究对象为使用 VL (GlideScope®) 或 DL (Macintosh®) 进行紧急气管插管的成年患者。评估结果为插管成功率和插管周围不良事件发生率。采用倾向评分匹配和多变量风险回归分析进行统计评估:研究共纳入 3424 名患者,其中 VL 组 342 人,DL 组 3082 人。初步分析显示,两种方法的插管成功率没有明显差异。不过,VL 组发生的插管周围不良事件较少(33% 比 40%)。经过倾向得分匹配后,观察到 DL 组的首次尝试成功率更高(88.9% 对 81.3%,风险差异:7.6,95% CI:1.9 对 13.2,P=0.009),但在围插管不良事件方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。在经验不足的插管者中,VL 的首次尝试成功率较低。对中度和高度经验的插管者以及同时使用诱导剂和神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者进行的亚组分析表明,结果与整个队列的分析结果一致:结论:VL 和 DL 的首次尝试成功率和插管周围不良事件的发生率相当。由经验丰富或中等的插管者使用 VL 尤为有利。插管方法的选择与临床经验和技术相结合,对急诊插管的成功率和安全性起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency tracheal intubation in emergency department: a propensity score matching analysis.

Background: The high incidence of airway management failure in the emergency department (ED) necessitates a comparative analysis of laryngoscopy methods. This study aims to compare the success and complications associated with video-assisted laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in emergency tracheal intubation in ED.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the ED of Thammasat University Hospital. It involved adult patients undergoing emergency tracheal intubation using either VL (GlideScope®) or DL (Macintosh®). The outcomes assessed were success rates of intubation and occurrence of peri-intubation adverse events. Propensity score matching and multivariable risk regression analysis were employed for statistical evaluation.

Results: The study included 3,424 patients, with 342 in the VL group and 3,082 in the DL group. The initial analysis revealed no significant differences in the intubation success rates between the two methods. However, the VL group experienced fewer peri-intubation adverse events (33% compared to 40%). After propensity score matching, a higher first-attempt success rate was observed in the DL group (88.9% vs. 81.3%, risk difference: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.9 to 13.2, p=0.009), but there was no statistically significant difference in peri-intubation adverse events. VL had a lower first-attempt success rate among low-experience intubators. Subgroup analyses of intubators with moderate and high experience, as well as patients who received both induction agents and neuromuscular blocking agents, show results consistent with the analysis of the entire cohort.

Conclusion: Both VL and DL have comparable first-attempt success rates and peri-intubation adverse events. VL is particularly beneficial when used by moderately or highly experienced intubator. The choice of intubation method, combined with clinical experience and technique plays a critical role in the success and safety of emergency intubations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信