将皮肤科医生纳入初级保健:对延误、患者和专业经验的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Maria Lovén, Amanda Eklund, Laura Huilaja, Markus Paananen, Paulus Torkki
{"title":"将皮肤科医生纳入初级保健:对延误、患者和专业经验的影响。","authors":"Maria Lovén, Amanda Eklund, Laura Huilaja, Markus Paananen, Paulus Torkki","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11923-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare centres are burdened by the management of patients with skin conditions, while general practitioners might lack the expertise to assess skin changes accurately. The traditional care chain for skin findings is a multistage process that can cause delayed diagnosis and treatment, distressing the patient. This study aimed to determine whether adding a dermatologist to the primary care team would streamline the care pathway of patients with skin conditions, while examining levels of satisfaction among patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental multicentre study was conducted in three primary health centres in Finland. A dermatologist was integrated into two of the centres (intervention) but not the third (control). Data on timing of diagnosis and treatment and number of contacts were collected from records and analysed per care path. The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) were used to measure the patient's experience of the appointment. NPS and professional satisfaction queries were used to measure professional satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 186 intervention and 176 control patients were included, with 38 primary care professionals. Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed a significantly shorter time to confirmed diagnosis and to treatment start (25 vs. 49 days, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion (49% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) receiving immediate treatment in the primary care setting. Patients in the intervention group required fewer visits. Patient experience by PEI and NPS scores were higher in the intervention group (p ≤ 0.022 for each). Satisfaction levels among professionals in both groups were higher after the intervention than before, although the NPS score did not improve significantly in the control group. Almost all professionals advocated for the continuation of the integrated care pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of dermatologists into the primary care streamlined the management of skin conditions from diagnosis to treatment, while improving the experiences of both patients and healthcare professionals. This integrated care path is beneficial for the management of patients with skin findings in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating dermatologists in primary care: impact on delays, patient and professional experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Lovén, Amanda Eklund, Laura Huilaja, Markus Paananen, Paulus Torkki\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11923-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary healthcare centres are burdened by the management of patients with skin conditions, while general practitioners might lack the expertise to assess skin changes accurately. The traditional care chain for skin findings is a multistage process that can cause delayed diagnosis and treatment, distressing the patient. This study aimed to determine whether adding a dermatologist to the primary care team would streamline the care pathway of patients with skin conditions, while examining levels of satisfaction among patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental multicentre study was conducted in three primary health centres in Finland. A dermatologist was integrated into two of the centres (intervention) but not the third (control). Data on timing of diagnosis and treatment and number of contacts were collected from records and analysed per care path. The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) were used to measure the patient's experience of the appointment. NPS and professional satisfaction queries were used to measure professional satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 186 intervention and 176 control patients were included, with 38 primary care professionals. Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed a significantly shorter time to confirmed diagnosis and to treatment start (25 vs. 49 days, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion (49% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) receiving immediate treatment in the primary care setting. Patients in the intervention group required fewer visits. Patient experience by PEI and NPS scores were higher in the intervention group (p ≤ 0.022 for each). Satisfaction levels among professionals in both groups were higher after the intervention than before, although the NPS score did not improve significantly in the control group. Almost all professionals advocated for the continuation of the integrated care pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of dermatologists into the primary care streamlined the management of skin conditions from diagnosis to treatment, while improving the experiences of both patients and healthcare professionals. This integrated care path is beneficial for the management of patients with skin findings in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577956/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11923-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11923-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基层医疗中心在管理皮肤病患者方面负担沉重,而全科医生可能缺乏准确评估皮肤变化的专业知识。传统的皮肤病护理链是一个多阶段的过程,可能导致诊断和治疗的延误,给患者带来痛苦。本研究旨在确定在初级医疗团队中增加一名皮肤科医生是否会简化皮肤病患者的护理流程,同时考察患者和医护人员的满意度:在芬兰的三个初级保健中心开展了一项准实验性多中心研究。其中两个中心(干预中心)有一名皮肤科医生,而第三个中心(对照中心)没有。研究人员从记录中收集了有关诊断和治疗时间以及接触次数的数据,并按护理路径进行了分析。患者满意度工具(PEI)和净促进者得分(NPS)用于衡量患者的就诊体验。NPS和专业人员满意度调查用于衡量专业人员的满意度:共纳入了 186 名干预组患者和 176 名对照组患者,以及 38 名初级保健专业人员。与对照组相比,干预组从确诊到开始治疗的时间大大缩短(25 天对 49 天,p 结论:干预组的患者从确诊到开始治疗的时间大大缩短:将皮肤科医生纳入初级保健,简化了从诊断到治疗的皮肤病管理流程,同时改善了患者和医护人员的体验。这种综合护理路径有利于基层医疗机构对皮肤病患者的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating dermatologists in primary care: impact on delays, patient and professional experiences.

Background: Primary healthcare centres are burdened by the management of patients with skin conditions, while general practitioners might lack the expertise to assess skin changes accurately. The traditional care chain for skin findings is a multistage process that can cause delayed diagnosis and treatment, distressing the patient. This study aimed to determine whether adding a dermatologist to the primary care team would streamline the care pathway of patients with skin conditions, while examining levels of satisfaction among patients and healthcare professionals.

Methods: A quasi-experimental multicentre study was conducted in three primary health centres in Finland. A dermatologist was integrated into two of the centres (intervention) but not the third (control). Data on timing of diagnosis and treatment and number of contacts were collected from records and analysed per care path. The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) and Net Promoter Score (NPS) were used to measure the patient's experience of the appointment. NPS and professional satisfaction queries were used to measure professional satisfaction.

Results: In total 186 intervention and 176 control patients were included, with 38 primary care professionals. Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed a significantly shorter time to confirmed diagnosis and to treatment start (25 vs. 49 days, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion (49% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) receiving immediate treatment in the primary care setting. Patients in the intervention group required fewer visits. Patient experience by PEI and NPS scores were higher in the intervention group (p ≤ 0.022 for each). Satisfaction levels among professionals in both groups were higher after the intervention than before, although the NPS score did not improve significantly in the control group. Almost all professionals advocated for the continuation of the integrated care pathway.

Conclusions: The integration of dermatologists into the primary care streamlined the management of skin conditions from diagnosis to treatment, while improving the experiences of both patients and healthcare professionals. This integrated care path is beneficial for the management of patients with skin findings in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信