如何评估医生管理人员的管理态度:电子德尔菲进程的结果。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Americo Cicchetti, Federica Morandi, Ilaria Valentini, Fausto di Vincenzo
{"title":"如何评估医生管理人员的管理态度:电子德尔菲进程的结果。","authors":"Americo Cicchetti, Federica Morandi, Ilaria Valentini, Fausto di Vincenzo","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11938-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 1990s, healthcare systems in many Western countries, including Italy, have undergone significant reforms, transforming organizational models and structures to meet the growing demand for healthcare services efficiently. This transformation has introduced new managerial roles for doctors-managers, particularly at the midlevel, creating \"doctor-manager\" positions that involve both clinical and managerial responsibilities. However, doctor-managers often struggle to balance these dual roles due to a lack of formal managerial training and the inherent conflict between clinical and economic objectives. This study aims to define new evaluation dimensions that can enhance the existing scale and develop a new tool to assess the necessary components of the managerial attitude dimension required by doctor-managers in the current Italian healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study updated Cicchetti's 2005 scale to reflect the changes that have occurred in healthcare organizations over the past 20 years, focusing on the evolving roles and challenges of middle healthcare managers. A scoping review was conducted to explore the existing literature, resulting in the identification and analysis of 24 key articles. Thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, identified 171 items related to managerial attitude. These items were further refined, resulting in a 61-item Health Middle Manager Competencies Scale. The scale was evaluated by a Delphi panel through an e-survey, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final Competencies Scale for Middle Managers of Health consists of 61 items, validated by the Delphi panel of experts. The panel reached consensus on the relevance and significance of each item, confirming the scale's reliability with an acceptable Cronbach alpha. The new scale captures various dimensions of the competencies essential for middle managers in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into the dimensions of doctor managerial attitude and contributes to the update of Cicchetti's Scale to develop a new tool that assesses all the necessary components now required within the managerial attitude dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to assess doctor managers' managerial attitude: results from an e-Delphi process.\",\"authors\":\"Americo Cicchetti, Federica Morandi, Ilaria Valentini, Fausto di Vincenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11938-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 1990s, healthcare systems in many Western countries, including Italy, have undergone significant reforms, transforming organizational models and structures to meet the growing demand for healthcare services efficiently. This transformation has introduced new managerial roles for doctors-managers, particularly at the midlevel, creating \\\"doctor-manager\\\" positions that involve both clinical and managerial responsibilities. However, doctor-managers often struggle to balance these dual roles due to a lack of formal managerial training and the inherent conflict between clinical and economic objectives. This study aims to define new evaluation dimensions that can enhance the existing scale and develop a new tool to assess the necessary components of the managerial attitude dimension required by doctor-managers in the current Italian healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study updated Cicchetti's 2005 scale to reflect the changes that have occurred in healthcare organizations over the past 20 years, focusing on the evolving roles and challenges of middle healthcare managers. A scoping review was conducted to explore the existing literature, resulting in the identification and analysis of 24 key articles. Thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, identified 171 items related to managerial attitude. These items were further refined, resulting in a 61-item Health Middle Manager Competencies Scale. The scale was evaluated by a Delphi panel through an e-survey, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final Competencies Scale for Middle Managers of Health consists of 61 items, validated by the Delphi panel of experts. The panel reached consensus on the relevance and significance of each item, confirming the scale's reliability with an acceptable Cronbach alpha. The new scale captures various dimensions of the competencies essential for middle managers in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides insights into the dimensions of doctor managerial attitude and contributes to the update of Cicchetti's Scale to develop a new tool that assesses all the necessary components now required within the managerial attitude dimension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11938-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11938-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,包括意大利在内的许多西方国家的医疗保健系统进行了重大改革,转变了组织模式和结构,以有效满足日益增长的医疗保健服务需求。这种转型为医生-管理者(尤其是中层医生-管理者)引入了新的管理角色,设立了兼具临床和管理职责的 "医生-管理者 "职位。然而,由于缺乏正规的管理培训以及临床目标与经济目标之间的内在冲突,医生-管理人员往往难以平衡这双重角色。本研究旨在定义新的评估维度,以增强现有量表的功能,并开发一种新工具来评估当前意大利医疗系统中医生管理者所需的管理态度维度的必要组成部分:本研究更新了 Cicchetti 2005 年的量表,以反映医疗机构在过去 20 年中发生的变化,重点关注中层医疗管理人员不断演变的角色和挑战。研究人员对现有文献进行了范围界定,最终确定并分析了 24 篇重要文章。在 NVivo 软件的帮助下,进行了主题分析,确定了 171 个与管理者态度相关的项目。对这些项目进行了进一步细化,最终形成了 61 个项目的健康中层管理者能力量表。德尔菲小组通过电子调查对该量表进行了评估,并使用 Cronbach's alpha 对其可靠性进行了评估:结果:最终的卫生中层管理人员胜任能力量表由 61 个项目组成,并经过德尔菲专家小组的验证。专家小组就每个项目的相关性和重要性达成了共识,并以可接受的克朗巴赫α证实了量表的可靠性。新量表捕捉到了医疗机构中层管理人员必备能力的各个维度:本研究深入探讨了医生管理态度的各个维度,有助于对 Cicchetti 量表进行更新,从而开发出一种新的工具,用于评估管理态度维度中目前所需的所有必要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to assess doctor managers' managerial attitude: results from an e-Delphi process.

Background: Since the 1990s, healthcare systems in many Western countries, including Italy, have undergone significant reforms, transforming organizational models and structures to meet the growing demand for healthcare services efficiently. This transformation has introduced new managerial roles for doctors-managers, particularly at the midlevel, creating "doctor-manager" positions that involve both clinical and managerial responsibilities. However, doctor-managers often struggle to balance these dual roles due to a lack of formal managerial training and the inherent conflict between clinical and economic objectives. This study aims to define new evaluation dimensions that can enhance the existing scale and develop a new tool to assess the necessary components of the managerial attitude dimension required by doctor-managers in the current Italian healthcare system.

Methods: This study updated Cicchetti's 2005 scale to reflect the changes that have occurred in healthcare organizations over the past 20 years, focusing on the evolving roles and challenges of middle healthcare managers. A scoping review was conducted to explore the existing literature, resulting in the identification and analysis of 24 key articles. Thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo software, identified 171 items related to managerial attitude. These items were further refined, resulting in a 61-item Health Middle Manager Competencies Scale. The scale was evaluated by a Delphi panel through an e-survey, and Cronbach's alpha was used to assess reliability.

Results: The final Competencies Scale for Middle Managers of Health consists of 61 items, validated by the Delphi panel of experts. The panel reached consensus on the relevance and significance of each item, confirming the scale's reliability with an acceptable Cronbach alpha. The new scale captures various dimensions of the competencies essential for middle managers in healthcare settings.

Conclusion: The study provides insights into the dimensions of doctor managerial attitude and contributes to the update of Cicchetti's Scale to develop a new tool that assesses all the necessary components now required within the managerial attitude dimension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信