Nour Khezemi;Jean Baptiste Minani;Fatima Sabir;Naouel Moha;Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc;Ghizlane El Boussaidi
{"title":"物联网系统架构风格及其质量要求的系统性文献综述","authors":"Nour Khezemi;Jean Baptiste Minani;Fatima Sabir;Naouel Moha;Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc;Ghizlane El Boussaidi","doi":"10.1109/JIOT.2024.3435496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet of Things (IoT) is increasingly prevalent, with systems developed across various domains. Choosing the right IoT architectural style is challenging due to the diversity of devices, dynamic environments, and real-time data needs. This choice significantly impacts system quality, requiring a careful balance of quality requirements and tradeoffs. Previous studies have not adequately identified the most suitable architectural styles for specific IoT quality needs. This study presents a systematic literature review of 103 primary studies (PSs) on IoT system quality requirements and architectural styles, assessing how each architectural style satisfies specific requirements. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol to report our findings and answer three research questions (RQs). We selected PSs by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to relevant papers published until the end of 2023. We analyzed data from PSs to understand IoT system quality requirements and architectural styles, assessing their alignment. The research revealed ten essential quality requirements for IoT systems and identified ten distinct architectural styles. Notably, each architectural style varies in its capacity to fulfill specific quality requirements, particularly regarding security, scalability, and performance. SOA, client-server, and REST architectural styles best fulfill many quality requirements. However, various architectural styles, such as Layered, Microservices, and Peer-to-Peer, show limited support for privacy requirements. Our findings can guide IoT systems practitioners in selecting an architectural style that aligns with their desired quality standards. Additionally, we recommend new research opportunities to deepen understanding of key architectural styles based on specific quality requirements.","PeriodicalId":54347,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Internet of Things Journal","volume":"11 23","pages":"37599-37616"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Literature Review of IoT System Architectural Styles and Their Quality Requirements\",\"authors\":\"Nour Khezemi;Jean Baptiste Minani;Fatima Sabir;Naouel Moha;Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc;Ghizlane El Boussaidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JIOT.2024.3435496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Internet of Things (IoT) is increasingly prevalent, with systems developed across various domains. Choosing the right IoT architectural style is challenging due to the diversity of devices, dynamic environments, and real-time data needs. This choice significantly impacts system quality, requiring a careful balance of quality requirements and tradeoffs. Previous studies have not adequately identified the most suitable architectural styles for specific IoT quality needs. This study presents a systematic literature review of 103 primary studies (PSs) on IoT system quality requirements and architectural styles, assessing how each architectural style satisfies specific requirements. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol to report our findings and answer three research questions (RQs). We selected PSs by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to relevant papers published until the end of 2023. We analyzed data from PSs to understand IoT system quality requirements and architectural styles, assessing their alignment. The research revealed ten essential quality requirements for IoT systems and identified ten distinct architectural styles. Notably, each architectural style varies in its capacity to fulfill specific quality requirements, particularly regarding security, scalability, and performance. SOA, client-server, and REST architectural styles best fulfill many quality requirements. However, various architectural styles, such as Layered, Microservices, and Peer-to-Peer, show limited support for privacy requirements. Our findings can guide IoT systems practitioners in selecting an architectural style that aligns with their desired quality standards. Additionally, we recommend new research opportunities to deepen understanding of key architectural styles based on specific quality requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Internet of Things Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 23\",\"pages\":\"37599-37616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Internet of Things Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10759538/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Internet of Things Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10759538/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Systematic Literature Review of IoT System Architectural Styles and Their Quality Requirements
The Internet of Things (IoT) is increasingly prevalent, with systems developed across various domains. Choosing the right IoT architectural style is challenging due to the diversity of devices, dynamic environments, and real-time data needs. This choice significantly impacts system quality, requiring a careful balance of quality requirements and tradeoffs. Previous studies have not adequately identified the most suitable architectural styles for specific IoT quality needs. This study presents a systematic literature review of 103 primary studies (PSs) on IoT system quality requirements and architectural styles, assessing how each architectural style satisfies specific requirements. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol to report our findings and answer three research questions (RQs). We selected PSs by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to relevant papers published until the end of 2023. We analyzed data from PSs to understand IoT system quality requirements and architectural styles, assessing their alignment. The research revealed ten essential quality requirements for IoT systems and identified ten distinct architectural styles. Notably, each architectural style varies in its capacity to fulfill specific quality requirements, particularly regarding security, scalability, and performance. SOA, client-server, and REST architectural styles best fulfill many quality requirements. However, various architectural styles, such as Layered, Microservices, and Peer-to-Peer, show limited support for privacy requirements. Our findings can guide IoT systems practitioners in selecting an architectural style that aligns with their desired quality standards. Additionally, we recommend new research opportunities to deepen understanding of key architectural styles based on specific quality requirements.
期刊介绍:
The EEE Internet of Things (IoT) Journal publishes articles and review articles covering various aspects of IoT, including IoT system architecture, IoT enabling technologies, IoT communication and networking protocols such as network coding, and IoT services and applications. Topics encompass IoT's impacts on sensor technologies, big data management, and future internet design for applications like smart cities and smart homes. Fields of interest include IoT architecture such as things-centric, data-centric, service-oriented IoT architecture; IoT enabling technologies and systematic integration such as sensor technologies, big sensor data management, and future Internet design for IoT; IoT services, applications, and test-beds such as IoT service middleware, IoT application programming interface (API), IoT application design, and IoT trials/experiments; IoT standardization activities and technology development in different standard development organizations (SDO) such as IEEE, IETF, ITU, 3GPP, ETSI, etc.