衡量美国医院住院病人就医程序不平等的情况。

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae142
Alon Bergman, Guy David, Ashwin Nathan, Jay Giri, Michael Ryan, Soumya Chikermane, Christin Thompson, Seth Clancy, Candace Gunnarsson
{"title":"衡量美国医院住院病人就医程序不平等的情况。","authors":"Alon Bergman, Guy David, Ashwin Nathan, Jay Giri, Michael Ryan, Soumya Chikermane, Christin Thompson, Seth Clancy, Candace Gunnarsson","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Geographic disparities in access to inpatient procedures are a significant issue within the US healthcare system. This study introduces the Procedure Access Inequality (PAI) index, a standardized metric to quantify these disparities while adjusting for disease prevalence. Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, we analyzed inpatient procedure data from 18 states between 2016 and 2019. The PAI index reveals notable variability in access inequality across different procedures, with minimally invasive and newer procedures exhibiting higher inequality. Key findings indicate that procedures such as skin grafts and minimally invasive gastrectomy have the highest PAI scores, while cesarean sections and percutaneous coronary interventions have the lowest. The study highlights that higher inequality is associated with greater market concentration and in particular, fewer hospitals offering these procedures. These findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions to address procedural access disparities to promote more equitable healthcare delivery across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 11","pages":"qxae142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Alon Bergman, Guy David, Ashwin Nathan, Jay Giri, Michael Ryan, Soumya Chikermane, Christin Thompson, Seth Clancy, Candace Gunnarsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Geographic disparities in access to inpatient procedures are a significant issue within the US healthcare system. This study introduces the Procedure Access Inequality (PAI) index, a standardized metric to quantify these disparities while adjusting for disease prevalence. Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, we analyzed inpatient procedure data from 18 states between 2016 and 2019. The PAI index reveals notable variability in access inequality across different procedures, with minimally invasive and newer procedures exhibiting higher inequality. Key findings indicate that procedures such as skin grafts and minimally invasive gastrectomy have the highest PAI scores, while cesarean sections and percutaneous coronary interventions have the lowest. The study highlights that higher inequality is associated with greater market concentration and in particular, fewer hospitals offering these procedures. These findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions to address procedural access disparities to promote more equitable healthcare delivery across the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"2 11\",\"pages\":\"qxae142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国医疗保健系统中,住院病人就医过程中的地域差异是一个重要问题。本研究引入了 "程序获取不平等(PAI)指数",这是一个标准化指标,用于量化这些差异,同时对疾病流行率进行调整。利用医疗成本与利用项目州住院患者数据库的数据,我们分析了 18 个州在 2016 年至 2019 年期间的住院患者手术数据。PAI 指数揭示了不同手术在就医不平等方面的显著差异,微创手术和较新手术的不平等程度更高。主要研究结果表明,皮肤移植和微创胃切除术等手术的 PAI 分数最高,而剖腹产和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 PAI 分数最低。研究强调,不平等程度越高,市场集中度越高,尤其是提供这些手术的医院越少。这些研究结果表明,有必要采取有针对性的政策干预措施来解决手术机会不均等的问题,以促进美国医疗服务的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.

Geographic disparities in access to inpatient procedures are a significant issue within the US healthcare system. This study introduces the Procedure Access Inequality (PAI) index, a standardized metric to quantify these disparities while adjusting for disease prevalence. Using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, we analyzed inpatient procedure data from 18 states between 2016 and 2019. The PAI index reveals notable variability in access inequality across different procedures, with minimally invasive and newer procedures exhibiting higher inequality. Key findings indicate that procedures such as skin grafts and minimally invasive gastrectomy have the highest PAI scores, while cesarean sections and percutaneous coronary interventions have the lowest. The study highlights that higher inequality is associated with greater market concentration and in particular, fewer hospitals offering these procedures. These findings emphasize the need for targeted policy interventions to address procedural access disparities to promote more equitable healthcare delivery across the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信