基于地标技术的外侧关节外腱鞘股骨隧道位置的高变异性

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1177/03635465241289417
Ajay C Kanakamedala, Bradley M Kruckeberg, Olivia M Jochl, Ryan J Whalen, Mark E Cinque, Thomas R Hackett, Jonathan A Godin, Armando F Vidal
{"title":"基于地标技术的外侧关节外腱鞘股骨隧道位置的高变异性","authors":"Ajay C Kanakamedala, Bradley M Kruckeberg, Olivia M Jochl, Ryan J Whalen, Mark E Cinque, Thomas R Hackett, Jonathan A Godin, Armando F Vidal","doi":"10.1177/03635465241289417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has increased. Various fixation points have been recommended based on tactile and anatomic landmarks; however, there is limited reporting of the accuracy or precision of these techniques in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether LET fixation points identified using anatomic landmarks and tactile techniques would fall within a predefined radiographic zone. It was hypothesized that the majority of LET fixation points would be inside the radiographic zone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postoperative lateral knee radiographs of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LET using a landmark-based technique without fluoroscopy between January 2018 and September 2023 were reviewed. Fixation points were measured by 2 raters based on their distance from an extension of the posterior femoral cortex line (PFCL) distally and a line perpendicular to the PFCL at the posterior condylar flare (PCF). Patients were excluded if the tunnel position could not be identified or if postoperative radiographs were malrotated. The mean LET position and percentage of points within the radiographic isometric zone, defined as 4 ± 4 mm posterior and 4 ± 3 mm anterior to the PFCL and 6 ± 4 mm distal and 20 ± 5 mm proximal to the PCF were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data sets were obtained for 47 cases. The mean LET position was 6.4 ± 7.1 mm (range, -9 to 27.3 mm) anterior to the PFCL and 1.8 ± 7.6 mm (range, -16.7 to 12.6 mm) proximal to the PCF. Overall, 53% of LET fixation points were within the predefined radiographic zone. Of the malpositioned tunnels (n = 22), their locations relative to the radiographic zone were anterior (n = 18), posterior (n = 2), proximal (n = 1), and anterior and distal (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found large variation in the location of LET fixation points, and almost half of fixation points were outside the predefined radiographic zone. Accurate and precise tunnel placement is one of multiple factors that may be important to minimize the risk of lateral compartment overconstraint, anterior cruciate ligament graft failure, and anisometry leading to LET graft loosening.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3569-3577"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Variability of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Femoral Tunnel Position With Landmark-Based Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Ajay C Kanakamedala, Bradley M Kruckeberg, Olivia M Jochl, Ryan J Whalen, Mark E Cinque, Thomas R Hackett, Jonathan A Godin, Armando F Vidal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241289417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has increased. Various fixation points have been recommended based on tactile and anatomic landmarks; however, there is limited reporting of the accuracy or precision of these techniques in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose/hypothesis: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether LET fixation points identified using anatomic landmarks and tactile techniques would fall within a predefined radiographic zone. It was hypothesized that the majority of LET fixation points would be inside the radiographic zone.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Postoperative lateral knee radiographs of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LET using a landmark-based technique without fluoroscopy between January 2018 and September 2023 were reviewed. Fixation points were measured by 2 raters based on their distance from an extension of the posterior femoral cortex line (PFCL) distally and a line perpendicular to the PFCL at the posterior condylar flare (PCF). Patients were excluded if the tunnel position could not be identified or if postoperative radiographs were malrotated. The mean LET position and percentage of points within the radiographic isometric zone, defined as 4 ± 4 mm posterior and 4 ± 3 mm anterior to the PFCL and 6 ± 4 mm distal and 20 ± 5 mm proximal to the PCF were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete data sets were obtained for 47 cases. The mean LET position was 6.4 ± 7.1 mm (range, -9 to 27.3 mm) anterior to the PFCL and 1.8 ± 7.6 mm (range, -16.7 to 12.6 mm) proximal to the PCF. Overall, 53% of LET fixation points were within the predefined radiographic zone. Of the malpositioned tunnels (n = 22), their locations relative to the radiographic zone were anterior (n = 18), posterior (n = 2), proximal (n = 1), and anterior and distal (n = 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found large variation in the location of LET fixation points, and almost half of fixation points were outside the predefined radiographic zone. Accurate and precise tunnel placement is one of multiple factors that may be important to minimize the risk of lateral compartment overconstraint, anterior cruciate ligament graft failure, and anisometry leading to LET graft loosening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3569-3577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241289417\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241289417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在前十字韧带重建中使用外侧关节外韧带增强术(LET)的情况越来越多。根据触觉和解剖标志推荐了各种固定点;然而,关于这些技术在临床实践中的准确性或精确性的报道却很有限:本研究的目的是评估使用解剖标志和触觉技术确定的 LET 固定点是否位于预定义的放射区域内。假设大多数 LET 固定点都在放射成像区域内:研究设计:横断面研究;证据级别:4:回顾了2018年1月至2023年9月期间使用基于地标的技术在无透视的情况下进行LET前交叉韧带重建的患者的术后膝关节侧位X光片。由两名评分员根据股骨后皮质线(PFCL)远端延长线和髁后外翻(PCF)处垂直于 PFCL 的线的距离测量固定点。如果无法确定隧道位置或术后X光片显示转位不良,则排除患者。计算了 LET 位置的平均值和在影像学等距区内的点的百分比,等距区的定义为 PFCL 后方 4 ± 4 mm,前方 4 ± 3 mm,PCF 远端 6 ± 4 mm,近端 20 ± 5 mm:获得了 47 个病例的完整数据集。平均 LET 位置为 PFCL 前方 6.4 ± 7.1 mm(范围为 -9 至 27.3 mm),PCF 近端 1.8 ± 7.6 mm(范围为 -16.7 至 12.6 mm)。总体而言,53% 的 LET 固定点位于预定义的放射区域内。在位置不正的隧道(22 个)中,其相对于放射区的位置分别为前方(18 个)、后方(2 个)、近端(1 个)以及前方和远端(1 个):本研究发现,LET 固定点的位置差异很大,近一半的固定点位于预定义的放射学区域之外。准确和精确的隧道位置是将侧室过度收缩、前交叉韧带移植失败以及导致LET移植松动的异常测量风险降至最低的多个重要因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Variability of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Femoral Tunnel Position With Landmark-Based Techniques.

Background: The utilization of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has increased. Various fixation points have been recommended based on tactile and anatomic landmarks; however, there is limited reporting of the accuracy or precision of these techniques in clinical practice.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether LET fixation points identified using anatomic landmarks and tactile techniques would fall within a predefined radiographic zone. It was hypothesized that the majority of LET fixation points would be inside the radiographic zone.

Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Postoperative lateral knee radiographs of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LET using a landmark-based technique without fluoroscopy between January 2018 and September 2023 were reviewed. Fixation points were measured by 2 raters based on their distance from an extension of the posterior femoral cortex line (PFCL) distally and a line perpendicular to the PFCL at the posterior condylar flare (PCF). Patients were excluded if the tunnel position could not be identified or if postoperative radiographs were malrotated. The mean LET position and percentage of points within the radiographic isometric zone, defined as 4 ± 4 mm posterior and 4 ± 3 mm anterior to the PFCL and 6 ± 4 mm distal and 20 ± 5 mm proximal to the PCF were calculated.

Results: Complete data sets were obtained for 47 cases. The mean LET position was 6.4 ± 7.1 mm (range, -9 to 27.3 mm) anterior to the PFCL and 1.8 ± 7.6 mm (range, -16.7 to 12.6 mm) proximal to the PCF. Overall, 53% of LET fixation points were within the predefined radiographic zone. Of the malpositioned tunnels (n = 22), their locations relative to the radiographic zone were anterior (n = 18), posterior (n = 2), proximal (n = 1), and anterior and distal (n = 1).

Conclusion: This study found large variation in the location of LET fixation points, and almost half of fixation points were outside the predefined radiographic zone. Accurate and precise tunnel placement is one of multiple factors that may be important to minimize the risk of lateral compartment overconstraint, anterior cruciate ligament graft failure, and anisometry leading to LET graft loosening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信