根据阿姆斯特丹内窥镜鼻窦手术完整性分类 (ACCESS) 评分预测 CRSwNP 患者对杜比鲁单抗的临床反应。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Gian Marco Pace, Francesco Giombi, Francesca Pirola, Michele Cerasuolo, Enrico Heffler, Giovanni Paoletti, Francesca Puggioni, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi
{"title":"根据阿姆斯特丹内窥镜鼻窦手术完整性分类 (ACCESS) 评分预测 CRSwNP 患者对杜比鲁单抗的临床反应。","authors":"Gian Marco Pace, Francesco Giombi, Francesca Pirola, Michele Cerasuolo, Enrico Heffler, Giovanni Paoletti, Francesca Puggioni, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi","doi":"10.1177/00034894241300812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although the effectiveness of molecular antibodies has been established, evidence is still lacking on objective predictors of response. The aim of this study was to assess whether the extent of previous endoscopic sinus surgeries, assessed by means of the Amsterdam Classification of Completeness of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ACCESS) score, may influence clinical outcomes in refractory CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A consecutive sample of patients treated with dupilumab for previously operated recalcitrant CRSwNP were enrolled in the study. Every patient was required to undergo a CT scan at baseline (T0), at 3 (T1), and 12 (T2) months after treatment start. ACCESS score was calculated at baseline, whilst at every timepoint patients underwent assessment of Nasal-Polyp-Score (NPS), Lund-Kennedy-Score (LKS), and had to fill in the 22-item Sinonasal-Outcome-Test (SNOT-22) and Visual-Analog-Scales (VAS) for sinonasal symptoms. Favorable outcome was considered based on EUFOREA guidelines, namely improving at least 3 of the followings: (i) NPS; (ii) SNOT-22; (iii) VAS-olfaction; and (iv) need for systemic corticosteroids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall favorable outcome was achieved in 69.1% (n = 38/55) of cases at T1, while in 89.1% (n = 49/55) at T2. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders at both timepoints. At T1, out of all the included variables, no statistically significant predictor of favorable outcome was observed. Conversely, at T2, ACCESS score was the only confirmed independent predictive factor of response to dupilumab treatment (OR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.67-0.92], <i>P</i> = .010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the extent of previous endoscopic sinus surgeries may have a role in influencing clinical outcomes in patients with refractory CRSwNP undergoing treatment with dupilumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894241300812"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Clinical Response to Dupilumab for CRSwNP Based on the Amsterdam Classification of Completeness of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ACCESS) Score.\",\"authors\":\"Gian Marco Pace, Francesco Giombi, Francesca Pirola, Michele Cerasuolo, Enrico Heffler, Giovanni Paoletti, Francesca Puggioni, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894241300812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although the effectiveness of molecular antibodies has been established, evidence is still lacking on objective predictors of response. The aim of this study was to assess whether the extent of previous endoscopic sinus surgeries, assessed by means of the Amsterdam Classification of Completeness of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ACCESS) score, may influence clinical outcomes in refractory CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A consecutive sample of patients treated with dupilumab for previously operated recalcitrant CRSwNP were enrolled in the study. Every patient was required to undergo a CT scan at baseline (T0), at 3 (T1), and 12 (T2) months after treatment start. ACCESS score was calculated at baseline, whilst at every timepoint patients underwent assessment of Nasal-Polyp-Score (NPS), Lund-Kennedy-Score (LKS), and had to fill in the 22-item Sinonasal-Outcome-Test (SNOT-22) and Visual-Analog-Scales (VAS) for sinonasal symptoms. Favorable outcome was considered based on EUFOREA guidelines, namely improving at least 3 of the followings: (i) NPS; (ii) SNOT-22; (iii) VAS-olfaction; and (iv) need for systemic corticosteroids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall favorable outcome was achieved in 69.1% (n = 38/55) of cases at T1, while in 89.1% (n = 49/55) at T2. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders at both timepoints. At T1, out of all the included variables, no statistically significant predictor of favorable outcome was observed. Conversely, at T2, ACCESS score was the only confirmed independent predictive factor of response to dupilumab treatment (OR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.67-0.92], <i>P</i> = .010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the extent of previous endoscopic sinus surgeries may have a role in influencing clinical outcomes in patients with refractory CRSwNP undergoing treatment with dupilumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34894241300812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241300812\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241300812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然分子抗体的有效性已得到证实,但仍缺乏客观预测反应的证据。本研究旨在通过阿姆斯特丹内窥镜鼻窦手术完整性分类(ACCESS)评分评估既往内窥镜鼻窦手术的程度是否会影响接受杜比单抗治疗的难治性CRSwNP患者的临床预后:本研究连续抽取了曾接受过手术治疗的难治性 CRSwNP 患者。每位患者均需在基线(T0)、治疗开始后 3 个月(T1)和 12 个月(T2)接受 CT 扫描。在基线时计算 ACCESS 评分,而在每个时间点,患者都要接受鼻息肉评分(NPS)、隆德-肯尼迪评分(LKS)的评估,并填写 22 项鼻窦症状测试表(SNOT-22)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。根据EUFOREA指南,即至少改善以下3项指标,即(i)NPS;(ii)SNOT-22;(iii)VAS-olfaction;(iv)是否需要使用全身性皮质类固醇,即可认为疗效良好:在 T1 阶段,69.1% 的病例(38/55)获得了总体良好的治疗效果,而在 T2 阶段,89.1% 的病例(49/55)获得了总体良好的治疗效果。在两个时间点,有反应者和无反应者的基线特征没有差异。在 T1 阶段,在所有纳入的变量中,没有观察到对良好预后有统计学意义的预测因素。相反,在T2,ACCESS评分是唯一被证实的对dupilumab治疗反应的独立预测因素(OR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.67-0.92],P = .010):我们的研究结果表明,对于接受杜必鲁单抗治疗的难治性 CRSwNP 患者来说,既往内窥镜鼻窦手术的程度可能会对临床结果产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Clinical Response to Dupilumab for CRSwNP Based on the Amsterdam Classification of Completeness of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ACCESS) Score.

Purpose: Although the effectiveness of molecular antibodies has been established, evidence is still lacking on objective predictors of response. The aim of this study was to assess whether the extent of previous endoscopic sinus surgeries, assessed by means of the Amsterdam Classification of Completeness of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ACCESS) score, may influence clinical outcomes in refractory CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab.

Materials and methods: A consecutive sample of patients treated with dupilumab for previously operated recalcitrant CRSwNP were enrolled in the study. Every patient was required to undergo a CT scan at baseline (T0), at 3 (T1), and 12 (T2) months after treatment start. ACCESS score was calculated at baseline, whilst at every timepoint patients underwent assessment of Nasal-Polyp-Score (NPS), Lund-Kennedy-Score (LKS), and had to fill in the 22-item Sinonasal-Outcome-Test (SNOT-22) and Visual-Analog-Scales (VAS) for sinonasal symptoms. Favorable outcome was considered based on EUFOREA guidelines, namely improving at least 3 of the followings: (i) NPS; (ii) SNOT-22; (iii) VAS-olfaction; and (iv) need for systemic corticosteroids.

Results: Overall favorable outcome was achieved in 69.1% (n = 38/55) of cases at T1, while in 89.1% (n = 49/55) at T2. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between responders and non-responders at both timepoints. At T1, out of all the included variables, no statistically significant predictor of favorable outcome was observed. Conversely, at T2, ACCESS score was the only confirmed independent predictive factor of response to dupilumab treatment (OR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.67-0.92], P = .010).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the extent of previous endoscopic sinus surgeries may have a role in influencing clinical outcomes in patients with refractory CRSwNP undergoing treatment with dupilumab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信