在现实生活中实现 2 型糖尿病患者的 ABC 目标。

Q3 Medicine
Hemraj Balchand Chandalia, Jayshri Dilip Jain, Sonal Hemraj Chandalia
{"title":"在现实生活中实现 2 型糖尿病患者的 ABC 目标。","authors":"Hemraj Balchand Chandalia, Jayshri Dilip Jain, Sonal Hemraj Chandalia","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This real-life observational study from a diabetes centre in Western India reports the status of A1C (glycated hemoglobin), blood pressure, and cholesterol levels (ABC goals) currently achieved in type 2 diabetic patients. <b>Research design and methods:</b> A cohort of 497 patients of type 2 diabetes first seen at the Diabetes Endocrine Nutrition Management and Research Centre from the years 2014 to 2017 were followed for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of 21.5 (7, 33) months. A minimum of two follow-up clinical evaluations and investigations were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) dropped significantly in the whole cohort (HbA1c, Percent: initial 9.0 ± 1.98, follow-up 7.66 ± 1.73; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Increasing duration of diabetes showed a significantly poorer achievement of HbA1c targets on follow-up (HbA1c 0-5 years vs 5.1-10 years and >10 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Pretreatment HbA1c of <6, 6.1-7, 7.1-7.5, 7.6-8, 8.1-9, and >9% was seen in 2, 15, 11, 8, 20, and 44%, respectively. The corresponding HbA1c values on follow-up were 5, 30, 14, 11, 17, and 23%, respectively. Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) group was in poorer control (HbA1c 8.20 ± 1.71) at follow-up than non-SGLT2i group (HbA1c 7.55 ± 1.72), <i>p</i> < 0.001) probably due to significantly greater use of sulphonylurea as background therapy in SGLT2i group (SGLT2i group 72.2%, non-SGLT2i group 58.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.02). Initial ABC targets were at goal for HbA1c, high blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in 17, 40, and 33% of patients, respectively. On follow-up, percent of patients at goal were HbA1c 35%, hypertension 95.77%, and LDL cholesterol 75.85%. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study brings out the difficulties in achieving HbA1c goals as compared to blood pressure and LDL cholesterol goals. Additionally, it brings out the efficacy of sulphonylureas as a treatment modality. Longer duration of diabetes resulted in lower achievement of glycemic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 11","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achievement of ABC Goals in Type 2 Diabetes in Real-life.\",\"authors\":\"Hemraj Balchand Chandalia, Jayshri Dilip Jain, Sonal Hemraj Chandalia\",\"doi\":\"10.59556/japi.72.0730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This real-life observational study from a diabetes centre in Western India reports the status of A1C (glycated hemoglobin), blood pressure, and cholesterol levels (ABC goals) currently achieved in type 2 diabetic patients. <b>Research design and methods:</b> A cohort of 497 patients of type 2 diabetes first seen at the Diabetes Endocrine Nutrition Management and Research Centre from the years 2014 to 2017 were followed for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of 21.5 (7, 33) months. A minimum of two follow-up clinical evaluations and investigations were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) dropped significantly in the whole cohort (HbA1c, Percent: initial 9.0 ± 1.98, follow-up 7.66 ± 1.73; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Increasing duration of diabetes showed a significantly poorer achievement of HbA1c targets on follow-up (HbA1c 0-5 years vs 5.1-10 years and >10 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Pretreatment HbA1c of <6, 6.1-7, 7.1-7.5, 7.6-8, 8.1-9, and >9% was seen in 2, 15, 11, 8, 20, and 44%, respectively. The corresponding HbA1c values on follow-up were 5, 30, 14, 11, 17, and 23%, respectively. Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) group was in poorer control (HbA1c 8.20 ± 1.71) at follow-up than non-SGLT2i group (HbA1c 7.55 ± 1.72), <i>p</i> < 0.001) probably due to significantly greater use of sulphonylurea as background therapy in SGLT2i group (SGLT2i group 72.2%, non-SGLT2i group 58.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.02). Initial ABC targets were at goal for HbA1c, high blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in 17, 40, and 33% of patients, respectively. On follow-up, percent of patients at goal were HbA1c 35%, hypertension 95.77%, and LDL cholesterol 75.85%. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study brings out the difficulties in achieving HbA1c goals as compared to blood pressure and LDL cholesterol goals. Additionally, it brings out the efficacy of sulphonylureas as a treatment modality. Longer duration of diabetes resulted in lower achievement of glycemic targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"volume\":\"72 11\",\"pages\":\"39-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项来自印度西部一家糖尿病中心的真实观察研究报告了 2 型糖尿病患者目前达到 A1C(糖化血红蛋白)、血压和胆固醇水平(ABC 目标)的情况。研究设计和方法:对 2014 年至 2017 年期间在糖尿病内分泌营养管理和研究中心首次就诊的 497 名 2 型糖尿病患者进行了队列随访,中位数[四分位数间距 (IQR)]随访时间为 21.5 (7, 33) 个月。对至少两次随访临床评估和检查进行了分析。结果整个队列中的血红蛋白 A1C (HbA1c) 显著下降(HbA1c,百分比:初始 9.0 ± 1.98,随访 7.66 ± 1.73;P < 0.0001)。糖尿病病程越长,随访的 HbA1c 目标实现情况越差(HbA1c 0-5 年 vs 5.1-10 年和 >10 年,p < 0.001)。治疗前 HbA1c 为 9% 的患者分别占 2%、15%、11%、8%、20% 和 44%。随访时相应的 HbA1c 值分别为 5%、30%、14%、11%、17% 和 23%。钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)组在随访时的控制情况(HbA1c 8.20 ± 1.71)差于非 SGLT2i 组(HbA1c 7.55 ± 1.72,P < 0.001),这可能是因为 SGLT2i 组使用磺脲类药物作为背景治疗的比例明显更高(SGLT2i 组为 72.2%,非 SGLT2i 组为 58.7%,P < 0.02)。分别有 17%、40% 和 33% 的患者 HbA1c、高血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的初始 ABC 指标达到目标。随访结果显示,达到目标的患者比例分别为 HbA1c 35%、高血压 95.77% 和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇 75.85%。结论与血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标相比,该研究揭示了实现 HbA1c 目标的困难。此外,研究还揭示了磺脲类药物作为一种治疗方式的有效性。糖尿病病程越长,血糖目标的实现率越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achievement of ABC Goals in Type 2 Diabetes in Real-life.

Introduction: This real-life observational study from a diabetes centre in Western India reports the status of A1C (glycated hemoglobin), blood pressure, and cholesterol levels (ABC goals) currently achieved in type 2 diabetic patients. Research design and methods: A cohort of 497 patients of type 2 diabetes first seen at the Diabetes Endocrine Nutrition Management and Research Centre from the years 2014 to 2017 were followed for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of 21.5 (7, 33) months. A minimum of two follow-up clinical evaluations and investigations were analyzed. Results: Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) dropped significantly in the whole cohort (HbA1c, Percent: initial 9.0 ± 1.98, follow-up 7.66 ± 1.73; p < 0.0001). Increasing duration of diabetes showed a significantly poorer achievement of HbA1c targets on follow-up (HbA1c 0-5 years vs 5.1-10 years and >10 years, p < 0.001). Pretreatment HbA1c of <6, 6.1-7, 7.1-7.5, 7.6-8, 8.1-9, and >9% was seen in 2, 15, 11, 8, 20, and 44%, respectively. The corresponding HbA1c values on follow-up were 5, 30, 14, 11, 17, and 23%, respectively. Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) group was in poorer control (HbA1c 8.20 ± 1.71) at follow-up than non-SGLT2i group (HbA1c 7.55 ± 1.72), p < 0.001) probably due to significantly greater use of sulphonylurea as background therapy in SGLT2i group (SGLT2i group 72.2%, non-SGLT2i group 58.7%, p < 0.02). Initial ABC targets were at goal for HbA1c, high blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in 17, 40, and 33% of patients, respectively. On follow-up, percent of patients at goal were HbA1c 35%, hypertension 95.77%, and LDL cholesterol 75.85%. Conclusion: The study brings out the difficulties in achieving HbA1c goals as compared to blood pressure and LDL cholesterol goals. Additionally, it brings out the efficacy of sulphonylureas as a treatment modality. Longer duration of diabetes resulted in lower achievement of glycemic targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信