用于紧急医疗服务和搜救机构镇痛的舒芬太尼舌下片剂。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hunter Albert McWilliams, Lindsey Fell, Albert Mason Wheeler, Emad Awad, Albert Richard Wheeler, William R Smith, Scott E McIntosh
{"title":"用于紧急医疗服务和搜救机构镇痛的舒芬太尼舌下片剂。","authors":"Hunter Albert McWilliams, Lindsey Fell, Albert Mason Wheeler, Emad Awad, Albert Richard Wheeler, William R Smith, Scott E McIntosh","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2431579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pain management in the potentially austere search and rescue (SAR) and emergency medical services (EMS) environments can be challenging. Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) routes of administration may be less practical. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of the sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) in prehospital settings and hypothesizes that its use will reduce pain while maintaining a reasonable safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case analysis examining patient records from Teton County Search and Rescue, Grand Teton National Park EMS, and Jackson Hole Fire/EMS from 2021-2023, based on the criteria that they were administered SST in a prehospital setting. Cases in which SST was used were examined to assess patient characteristics, injury classification, patient reported pain scale before and after SST, other medications administered, and vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria. Six individuals were excluded due to missing one or more of the key variables, and the analysis was carried out with the remaining (N = 64 cases). The mean pain score decreased from 8.0 ± 1.9 before medication administration to 5.5 ± 2.5 after administration, reflecting a statistically significant difference of 2.6 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001). The results also revealed statistically significant reductions in heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) following SST administration (mean HR dropped by 4.2 ± 9.1 beats/min, p = 0.004, and mean SBP dropped by 11.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.01). Changes in vital signs, although statistically significant, were not clinically significant and did not necessitate additional monitoring or intervention in any patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that SST administration led to a significant reduction in pain scores and exhibited a favorable safety profile regarding vital signs, including SBP, HR, respiratory rate (RR), and O<sub>2</sub> saturation. These findings support the utilization of SST for pain management in the prehospital setting, particularly in austere environments where traditional routes of administration may be impractical.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sublingual sufentanil tablet for analgesia in emergency medical services and search and rescue agencies.\",\"authors\":\"Hunter Albert McWilliams, Lindsey Fell, Albert Mason Wheeler, Emad Awad, Albert Richard Wheeler, William R Smith, Scott E McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2431579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pain management in the potentially austere search and rescue (SAR) and emergency medical services (EMS) environments can be challenging. Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) routes of administration may be less practical. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of the sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) in prehospital settings and hypothesizes that its use will reduce pain while maintaining a reasonable safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case analysis examining patient records from Teton County Search and Rescue, Grand Teton National Park EMS, and Jackson Hole Fire/EMS from 2021-2023, based on the criteria that they were administered SST in a prehospital setting. Cases in which SST was used were examined to assess patient characteristics, injury classification, patient reported pain scale before and after SST, other medications administered, and vital signs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria. Six individuals were excluded due to missing one or more of the key variables, and the analysis was carried out with the remaining (N = 64 cases). The mean pain score decreased from 8.0 ± 1.9 before medication administration to 5.5 ± 2.5 after administration, reflecting a statistically significant difference of 2.6 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001). The results also revealed statistically significant reductions in heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) following SST administration (mean HR dropped by 4.2 ± 9.1 beats/min, p = 0.004, and mean SBP dropped by 11.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.01). Changes in vital signs, although statistically significant, were not clinically significant and did not necessitate additional monitoring or intervention in any patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that SST administration led to a significant reduction in pain scores and exhibited a favorable safety profile regarding vital signs, including SBP, HR, respiratory rate (RR), and O<sub>2</sub> saturation. These findings support the utilization of SST for pain management in the prehospital setting, particularly in austere environments where traditional routes of administration may be impractical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2431579\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2431579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在可能十分艰苦的搜救(SAR)和紧急医疗服务(EMS)环境中进行疼痛管理具有挑战性。静脉注射(IV)和肌肉注射(IM)给药途径可能不太实用。本研究评估了舒芬太尼舌下片(SST)在院前环境中的疗效和安全性,并假设使用该药可减轻疼痛,同时保持合理的安全性:这是一项回顾性病例分析,研究了 2021-2023 年间来自泰顿县搜救队、大泰顿国家公园急救中心和杰克逊霍尔消防/急救中心的患者记录,依据的标准是他们在院前环境中使用了 SST。对使用了 SST 的病例进行了检查,以评估患者特征、伤情分类、SST 使用前后患者疼痛量表、使用的其他药物和生命体征:结果:70 名患者符合纳入标准。由于缺少一个或多个关键变量,有六名患者被排除在外,剩下的患者(N = 64 例)进行了分析。平均疼痛评分从用药前的 8.0 ± 1.9 降至用药后的 5.5 ± 2.5,差异达 2.6 ± 2.1,具有显著的统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结果还显示,服用 SST 后,心率(HR)和收缩压(SBP)均有明显下降(平均心率下降了 4.2 ± 9.1 次/分,p = 0.004;平均收缩压下降了 11.1 ± 21.8 mmHg,p = 0.01)。生命体征的变化虽然具有统计学意义,但临床意义不大,无需对任何患者进行额外监测或干预:我们的研究表明,使用 SST 能显著降低疼痛评分,并在生命体征(包括 SBP、HR、呼吸频率 (RR) 和氧气饱和度)方面表现出良好的安全性。这些研究结果支持在院前环境中使用 SST 进行疼痛治疗,尤其是在传统给药途径不可行的艰苦环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sublingual sufentanil tablet for analgesia in emergency medical services and search and rescue agencies.

Objectives: Pain management in the potentially austere search and rescue (SAR) and emergency medical services (EMS) environments can be challenging. Intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) routes of administration may be less practical. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of the sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) in prehospital settings and hypothesizes that its use will reduce pain while maintaining a reasonable safety profile.

Methods: This was a retrospective case analysis examining patient records from Teton County Search and Rescue, Grand Teton National Park EMS, and Jackson Hole Fire/EMS from 2021-2023, based on the criteria that they were administered SST in a prehospital setting. Cases in which SST was used were examined to assess patient characteristics, injury classification, patient reported pain scale before and after SST, other medications administered, and vital signs.

Results: Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria. Six individuals were excluded due to missing one or more of the key variables, and the analysis was carried out with the remaining (N = 64 cases). The mean pain score decreased from 8.0 ± 1.9 before medication administration to 5.5 ± 2.5 after administration, reflecting a statistically significant difference of 2.6 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001). The results also revealed statistically significant reductions in heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) following SST administration (mean HR dropped by 4.2 ± 9.1 beats/min, p = 0.004, and mean SBP dropped by 11.1 ± 21.8 mmHg, p = 0.01). Changes in vital signs, although statistically significant, were not clinically significant and did not necessitate additional monitoring or intervention in any patients.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that SST administration led to a significant reduction in pain scores and exhibited a favorable safety profile regarding vital signs, including SBP, HR, respiratory rate (RR), and O2 saturation. These findings support the utilization of SST for pain management in the prehospital setting, particularly in austere environments where traditional routes of administration may be impractical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信