经淀粉样蛋白淀粉样变性心肌病接受他法米迪治疗后,RV-PA 解偶联与死亡率增加有关。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Stéphanie K Schwarting, Michael Poledniczek, Yuliyan Metodiev, Lukas Stolz, Eva Hofmann, Ute Hegenbart, Stefan Schönland, Stefan Kääb, Steffen Massberg, Norbert Frey, Fabian Aus dem Siepen
{"title":"经淀粉样蛋白淀粉样变性心肌病接受他法米迪治疗后,RV-PA 解偶联与死亡率增加有关。","authors":"Stéphanie K Schwarting, Michael Poledniczek, Yuliyan Metodiev, Lukas Stolz, Eva Hofmann, Ute Hegenbart, Stefan Schönland, Stefan Kääb, Steffen Massberg, Norbert Frey, Fabian Aus dem Siepen","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02576-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PAc) describes the right ventricle's ability to adjust to an increased afterload. In case of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), impaired RV-PAc can result from increased left ventricular diastolic stiffness due to fibril deposition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While RV-PAc is a validated prognostic parameter in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), its prognostic relevance in ATTR-CM remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the prognostic implications of impaired RV-PAc on survival in ATTR-CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre study, RV-PAc was investigated by the echocardiographic surrogate of ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) in 418 ATTR-CM patients, all treated with a TTR stabilizer. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within a median time of 1.52 [IQR 0.72-2.56] years after diagnosis, 49 (11.7%) patients died. In multivariate Cox regression analysis impaired RV-PAc was a strong independent predictor of mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.14-4.07, p = 0.018). RV-PAc ratio at first presentation emerged as a robust marker for risk stratification with a determined optimal cut-off of 0.382 mm/mmHg (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.81). Patients with RV-PAc ratio ≤ 0.382 mm/mmHg exhibited significantly lower survival (HR 4.17, 95% CI 2.21-7.87, p < 0.001) within 3 years of follow up than those with RV-PAc ratio above the cut-off (Graphical Abstract).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impaired adaptation of the RV to increased afterload is associated with worse outcome in ATTR-CM patients. RV-PAc ratio can serve as an echocardiographic predictor for all-cause mortality. Therefore, the determination of RV-PAc could improve risk stratification for ATTR-CM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RV-PA uncoupling is associated with increased mortality in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy treated with tafamidis.\",\"authors\":\"Stéphanie K Schwarting, Michael Poledniczek, Yuliyan Metodiev, Lukas Stolz, Eva Hofmann, Ute Hegenbart, Stefan Schönland, Stefan Kääb, Steffen Massberg, Norbert Frey, Fabian Aus dem Siepen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-024-02576-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PAc) describes the right ventricle's ability to adjust to an increased afterload. In case of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), impaired RV-PAc can result from increased left ventricular diastolic stiffness due to fibril deposition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While RV-PAc is a validated prognostic parameter in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), its prognostic relevance in ATTR-CM remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the prognostic implications of impaired RV-PAc on survival in ATTR-CM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicentre study, RV-PAc was investigated by the echocardiographic surrogate of ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) in 418 ATTR-CM patients, all treated with a TTR stabilizer. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within a median time of 1.52 [IQR 0.72-2.56] years after diagnosis, 49 (11.7%) patients died. In multivariate Cox regression analysis impaired RV-PAc was a strong independent predictor of mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.14-4.07, p = 0.018). RV-PAc ratio at first presentation emerged as a robust marker for risk stratification with a determined optimal cut-off of 0.382 mm/mmHg (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.81). Patients with RV-PAc ratio ≤ 0.382 mm/mmHg exhibited significantly lower survival (HR 4.17, 95% CI 2.21-7.87, p < 0.001) within 3 years of follow up than those with RV-PAc ratio above the cut-off (Graphical Abstract).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impaired adaptation of the RV to increased afterload is associated with worse outcome in ATTR-CM patients. RV-PAc ratio can serve as an echocardiographic predictor for all-cause mortality. Therefore, the determination of RV-PAc could improve risk stratification for ATTR-CM patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02576-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02576-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:右心室与肺动脉耦合(RV-PAc)描述了右心室调节后负荷增加的能力。在转甲状腺素淀粉样变性心肌病(ATTR-CM)的情况下,由于纤维沉积导致左心室舒张期僵硬度增加,会导致右心室-肺动脉耦合(RV-PAc)受损:RV-PAc是肺动脉高压(PAH)的一个有效预后参数,但其在ATTR-CM中的预后相关性仍不清楚。我们试图评估RV-PAc受损对ATTR-CM患者生存的预后影响:在这项多中心研究中,通过超声心动图代用指标三尖瓣环面收缩期偏移与估计肺动脉收缩压之比(TAPSE/PASP)对 418 例 ATTR-CM 患者的 RV-PAc 进行了调查,所有患者均接受了 TTR 稳定剂治疗。主要结果是全因死亡率:在确诊后 1.52 [IQR 0.72-2.56] 年的中位时间内,49 名患者(11.7%)死亡。在多变量 Cox 回归分析中,受损的 RV-PAc 是死亡率的一个强有力的独立预测因素(危险比 (HR) 2.16,95% 置信区间 (CI) 1.14-4.07,p = 0.018)。首次发病时的 RV-PAc 比值是进行风险分层的可靠指标,最佳临界值为 0.382 mm/mmHg(曲线下面积 (AUC) 0.73,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.65-0.81)。RV-PAc比值≤0.382 mm/mmHg的患者生存率明显较低(HR 4.17,95% CI 2.21-7.87,PRV对后负荷增加的适应性受损与ATTR-CM患者的预后较差有关。RV-PAc 比值可作为全因死亡率的超声心动图预测指标。因此,测定 RV-PAc 可以改善 ATTR-CM 患者的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RV-PA uncoupling is associated with increased mortality in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy treated with tafamidis.

Background: The right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PAc) describes the right ventricle's ability to adjust to an increased afterload. In case of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), impaired RV-PAc can result from increased left ventricular diastolic stiffness due to fibril deposition.

Objectives: While RV-PAc is a validated prognostic parameter in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), its prognostic relevance in ATTR-CM remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the prognostic implications of impaired RV-PAc on survival in ATTR-CM.

Methods: In this multicentre study, RV-PAc was investigated by the echocardiographic surrogate of ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to estimated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) in 418 ATTR-CM patients, all treated with a TTR stabilizer. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

Results: Within a median time of 1.52 [IQR 0.72-2.56] years after diagnosis, 49 (11.7%) patients died. In multivariate Cox regression analysis impaired RV-PAc was a strong independent predictor of mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.14-4.07, p = 0.018). RV-PAc ratio at first presentation emerged as a robust marker for risk stratification with a determined optimal cut-off of 0.382 mm/mmHg (area under the curve (AUC) 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.81). Patients with RV-PAc ratio ≤ 0.382 mm/mmHg exhibited significantly lower survival (HR 4.17, 95% CI 2.21-7.87, p < 0.001) within 3 years of follow up than those with RV-PAc ratio above the cut-off (Graphical Abstract).

Conclusion: Impaired adaptation of the RV to increased afterload is associated with worse outcome in ATTR-CM patients. RV-PAc ratio can serve as an echocardiographic predictor for all-cause mortality. Therefore, the determination of RV-PAc could improve risk stratification for ATTR-CM patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信