分子改变在原发性骨髓纤维化患者移植决定中的作用。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Damien Luque Paz, Nico Gagelmann, Lina Benajiba, Jérémie Riou, Rachel B Salit, Corentin Orvain, Thomas Schroeder, Claire Bories, Carmelo Gurnari, Anita Badbaran, Francoise Boyer-Perrard, Simona Pagliuca, Christina Rautenberg, Suzanne Tavitian, Victoria Panagiota, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Felicitas R Thol, Emilie Cayssials, Michael Heuser, Marie-Therese Rubio, Bruno Cassinat, Rafael Daltro de Oliveira, Craig S Sauter, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Bart L Scott, Valérie Ugo, Nicolaus Kröger, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Marie Robin
{"title":"分子改变在原发性骨髓纤维化患者移植决定中的作用。","authors":"Damien Luque Paz, Nico Gagelmann, Lina Benajiba, Jérémie Riou, Rachel B Salit, Corentin Orvain, Thomas Schroeder, Claire Bories, Carmelo Gurnari, Anita Badbaran, Francoise Boyer-Perrard, Simona Pagliuca, Christina Rautenberg, Suzanne Tavitian, Victoria Panagiota, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Felicitas R Thol, Emilie Cayssials, Michael Heuser, Marie-Therese Rubio, Bruno Cassinat, Rafael Daltro de Oliveira, Craig S Sauter, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Bart L Scott, Valérie Ugo, Nicolaus Kröger, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Marie Robin","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinico-biological scores which incorporate molecular data (MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n=241) and one non-transplant cohorts (n=239) were used to test the hypothesis that PMF patients with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. 105 non-transplanted patients could be matched to the 239 transplanted patients. Mean age in transplanted and non-transplanted matched patients was 55.5 and 57.9 years. Blood cell count and DIPSS score distribution were similar in both groups. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year OS rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% versus 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% versus 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5 versus 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% versus 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70V2 (51.8% versus 24%). Intermediate MIPSS70 patients have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their MTSS were low or intermediate. Transplanted patients had an increased mortality risk the first year but a significant benefit with HSCT after the one-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of molecular alterations in transplantation decisions for patients with primary myelofibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Damien Luque Paz, Nico Gagelmann, Lina Benajiba, Jérémie Riou, Rachel B Salit, Corentin Orvain, Thomas Schroeder, Claire Bories, Carmelo Gurnari, Anita Badbaran, Francoise Boyer-Perrard, Simona Pagliuca, Christina Rautenberg, Suzanne Tavitian, Victoria Panagiota, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Felicitas R Thol, Emilie Cayssials, Michael Heuser, Marie-Therese Rubio, Bruno Cassinat, Rafael Daltro de Oliveira, Craig S Sauter, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Bart L Scott, Valérie Ugo, Nicolaus Kröger, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Marie Robin\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinico-biological scores which incorporate molecular data (MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n=241) and one non-transplant cohorts (n=239) were used to test the hypothesis that PMF patients with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. 105 non-transplanted patients could be matched to the 239 transplanted patients. Mean age in transplanted and non-transplanted matched patients was 55.5 and 57.9 years. Blood cell count and DIPSS score distribution were similar in both groups. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year OS rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% versus 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% versus 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5 versus 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% versus 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70V2 (51.8% versus 24%). Intermediate MIPSS70 patients have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their MTSS were low or intermediate. Transplanted patients had an increased mortality risk the first year but a significant benefit with HSCT after the one-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究旨在根据结合分子数据的临床生物评分(MIPSS70和MIPSS70+V2)分析造血干细胞移植的潜在生存益处,以促进这方面的决策。一个移植队列(样本数=241)和一个非移植队列(样本数=239)被用于检验分子评分风险较高的 PMF 患者是否能从造血干细胞移植中获益的假设。以移植队列为参照,采用加权倾向评分平衡混杂因素。进行了加权考克斯比例危险模型和逻辑回归分析。105名非移植患者与239名移植患者进行了配对。移植和非移植匹配患者的平均年龄分别为 55.5 岁和 57.9 岁。两组患者的血细胞计数和DIPSS评分分布相似。造血干细胞移植与中度-2(60.1% 对 41.5%)和高风险 DIPSS 患者(44.4% 对 6.55%)、高风险 MIPSS70(46.5 对 23.9%)、高风险(73.2% 对 39.7%)或极高风险 MIPSS70V2(51.8% 对 24%)的较高 6 年 OS 率相关。中度MIPSS70患者只有在MTSS为低度或中度时,造血干细胞移植的存活率才有优势。移植患者第一年的死亡风险增加,但在高风险患者中观察到造血干细胞移植一年后的显著获益。这项研究证实,与DIPSS类似,除MTSS外,MIPSS70和MIPSS70+V2风险评分也可用于确定哪些原发性骨髓纤维化患者可从造血干细胞移植中获益,而非非造血干细胞移植策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of molecular alterations in transplantation decisions for patients with primary myelofibrosis.

The aim of our study was to analyze the potential survival benefit associated with HSCT according to clinico-biological scores which incorporate molecular data (MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2) to facilitate decision-making in this context. One transplant (n=241) and one non-transplant cohorts (n=239) were used to test the hypothesis that PMF patients with higher risk molecular score benefit from HSCT. A weighted propensity score was applied to balance confounding factors with the transplanted cohort as reference. Weighted Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression analyses were performed. 105 non-transplanted patients could be matched to the 239 transplanted patients. Mean age in transplanted and non-transplanted matched patients was 55.5 and 57.9 years. Blood cell count and DIPSS score distribution were similar in both groups. HSCT was associated with a higher 6-year OS rate in intermediate-2 (60.1% versus 41.5%) and high-risk DIPSS patients (44.4% versus 6.55%), high-risk MIPSS70 (46.5 versus 23.9%), high-risk (73.2% versus 39.7%) or very high-risk MIPSS70V2 (51.8% versus 24%). Intermediate MIPSS70 patients have an advantage of survival with HSCT only when their MTSS were low or intermediate. Transplanted patients had an increased mortality risk the first year but a significant benefit with HSCT after the one-year landmark was observed in higher risk patients. This study confirms that similar to DIPSS, MIPSS70 and MIPSS70+V2 risk score in addition to MTSS can be used to determine which patients with primary myelofibrosis have survival benefit from HSCT over non-HSCT strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信