电子病历的更新和变更对嵌入式实用临床试验中干预措施的实施和监测的影响。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Keith A Marsolo, Andrea Cheville, Edward R Melnick, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Gregory E Simon, Kathleen A Sluka, Leslie J Crofford, Karen L Staman, Rachel L Richesson, Judith M Schlaeger, Lesley H Curtis
{"title":"电子病历的更新和变更对嵌入式实用临床试验中干预措施的实施和监测的影响。","authors":"Keith A Marsolo, Andrea Cheville, Edward R Melnick, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Gregory E Simon, Kathleen A Sluka, Leslie J Crofford, Karen L Staman, Rachel L Richesson, Judith M Schlaeger, Lesley H Curtis","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 32 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of these trials rely on data from the electronic health record (EHR) to monitor outcomes and/or use functionality provided by the EHR platform to deliver the intervention. Given the complexity and dynamic nature of EHR systems, study teams have encountered challenges in use of the EHR for these purposes, including challenges related to local implementation of trial interventions, rapid technology evolution, EHR updates, and transitions in EHR systems. In this article, we share case examples and lessons learned, and suggest that teams need to be aware of-and perhaps proactively investigate- possible changes to EHR systems and data that will affect the delivery of interventions and the integrity and safety of pragmatic clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":"107744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of electronic health record updates and changes on the delivery and monitoring of interventions in embedded pragmatic clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Keith A Marsolo, Andrea Cheville, Edward R Melnick, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Gregory E Simon, Kathleen A Sluka, Leslie J Crofford, Karen L Staman, Rachel L Richesson, Judith M Schlaeger, Lesley H Curtis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 32 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of these trials rely on data from the electronic health record (EHR) to monitor outcomes and/or use functionality provided by the EHR platform to deliver the intervention. Given the complexity and dynamic nature of EHR systems, study teams have encountered challenges in use of the EHR for these purposes, including challenges related to local implementation of trial interventions, rapid technology evolution, EHR updates, and transitions in EHR systems. In this article, we share case examples and lessons learned, and suggest that teams need to be aware of-and perhaps proactively investigate- possible changes to EHR systems and data that will affect the delivery of interventions and the integrity and safety of pragmatic clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)实用临床试验协作组支持 32 项嵌入式实用临床试验的设计和实施,其中许多试验依赖电子病历(EHR)中的数据来监测结果和/或使用 EHR 平台提供的功能来实施干预。鉴于电子病历系统的复杂性和动态性,研究团队在将电子病历用于这些目的时遇到了挑战,包括与试验干预措施的本地实施、快速技术演进、电子病历更新和电子病历系统过渡有关的挑战。在这篇文章中,我们分享了案例和经验教训,并建议研究小组需要意识到--或许可以主动调查--电子病历系统和数据可能发生的变化,这些变化将影响干预措施的实施以及务实临床试验的完整性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of electronic health record updates and changes on the delivery and monitoring of interventions in embedded pragmatic clinical trials.

The NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory supports the design and conduct of 32 embedded pragmatic clinical trials, and many of these trials rely on data from the electronic health record (EHR) to monitor outcomes and/or use functionality provided by the EHR platform to deliver the intervention. Given the complexity and dynamic nature of EHR systems, study teams have encountered challenges in use of the EHR for these purposes, including challenges related to local implementation of trial interventions, rapid technology evolution, EHR updates, and transitions in EHR systems. In this article, we share case examples and lessons learned, and suggest that teams need to be aware of-and perhaps proactively investigate- possible changes to EHR systems and data that will affect the delivery of interventions and the integrity and safety of pragmatic clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信