Rachel L Wiley, Suneet P Chauhan, Emily A Johnson, Ipsita Ghose, Hailie N Ciomperlik, Hector Mendez-Figueroa
{"title":"预产期与非预产期剖宫产的产后出血发病率。","authors":"Rachel L Wiley, Suneet P Chauhan, Emily A Johnson, Ipsita Ghose, Hailie N Ciomperlik, Hector Mendez-Figueroa","doi":"10.1055/a-2437-0759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to compare the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcomes (CMHOs) among term (≥37 weeks) singletons who had scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries (CDs). A subgroup analysis was done for those without prior uterine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Retrospectively, we identified all singletons at term who had CDs. The unscheduled CDs included individuals admitted with a plan for vaginal delivery with at least 1 hour of attempted labor. CMHOs included any of the following: estimated blood loss of ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics (excluding prophylactic oxytocin) or Bakri balloon, surgical management of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, admission to intensive care unit, or maternal death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 8,623 deliveries in the study period, 2,691 (31.2%) had CDs at term, with 1,709 (67.3%) scheduled CDs, and 983 (36.5%) unscheduled CDs. Overall, the rate of CMHO was 23.3%, and the rate of blood transfusion was 4.1%. CMHOs were two-fold higher among unscheduled (34.5%) than scheduled CDs (16.9%; aRR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.81-2.63). The aRRs for blood transfusion and surgical interventions to manage postpartum hemorrhage were three times higher with unscheduled than scheduled CDs. The subgroup analysis indicated that among the cohorts without prior uterine surgery, the rate of the CMHOs was significantly higher when the CD was unscheduled versus scheduled (aRR 1.85; 95% CI 1.45-2.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Compared to scheduled CDs, the composite hemorrhagic adverse outcomes were significantly higher with unscheduled CDs.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of hemorrhage.. · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of transfusion.. · Atony treatment is higher in unscheduled cesareans..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postpartum Hemorrhagic Morbidity with Scheduled versus Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery at Term.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L Wiley, Suneet P Chauhan, Emily A Johnson, Ipsita Ghose, Hailie N Ciomperlik, Hector Mendez-Figueroa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2437-0759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to compare the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcomes (CMHOs) among term (≥37 weeks) singletons who had scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries (CDs). A subgroup analysis was done for those without prior uterine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Retrospectively, we identified all singletons at term who had CDs. The unscheduled CDs included individuals admitted with a plan for vaginal delivery with at least 1 hour of attempted labor. CMHOs included any of the following: estimated blood loss of ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics (excluding prophylactic oxytocin) or Bakri balloon, surgical management of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, admission to intensive care unit, or maternal death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 8,623 deliveries in the study period, 2,691 (31.2%) had CDs at term, with 1,709 (67.3%) scheduled CDs, and 983 (36.5%) unscheduled CDs. Overall, the rate of CMHO was 23.3%, and the rate of blood transfusion was 4.1%. CMHOs were two-fold higher among unscheduled (34.5%) than scheduled CDs (16.9%; aRR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.81-2.63). The aRRs for blood transfusion and surgical interventions to manage postpartum hemorrhage were three times higher with unscheduled than scheduled CDs. The subgroup analysis indicated that among the cohorts without prior uterine surgery, the rate of the CMHOs was significantly higher when the CD was unscheduled versus scheduled (aRR 1.85; 95% CI 1.45-2.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Compared to scheduled CDs, the composite hemorrhagic adverse outcomes were significantly higher with unscheduled CDs.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of hemorrhage.. · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of transfusion.. · Atony treatment is higher in unscheduled cesareans..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2437-0759\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2437-0759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postpartum Hemorrhagic Morbidity with Scheduled versus Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery at Term.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcomes (CMHOs) among term (≥37 weeks) singletons who had scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries (CDs). A subgroup analysis was done for those without prior uterine surgeries.
Study design: Retrospectively, we identified all singletons at term who had CDs. The unscheduled CDs included individuals admitted with a plan for vaginal delivery with at least 1 hour of attempted labor. CMHOs included any of the following: estimated blood loss of ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics (excluding prophylactic oxytocin) or Bakri balloon, surgical management of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, admission to intensive care unit, or maternal death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Of 8,623 deliveries in the study period, 2,691 (31.2%) had CDs at term, with 1,709 (67.3%) scheduled CDs, and 983 (36.5%) unscheduled CDs. Overall, the rate of CMHO was 23.3%, and the rate of blood transfusion was 4.1%. CMHOs were two-fold higher among unscheduled (34.5%) than scheduled CDs (16.9%; aRR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.81-2.63). The aRRs for blood transfusion and surgical interventions to manage postpartum hemorrhage were three times higher with unscheduled than scheduled CDs. The subgroup analysis indicated that among the cohorts without prior uterine surgery, the rate of the CMHOs was significantly higher when the CD was unscheduled versus scheduled (aRR 1.85; 95% CI 1.45-2.37).
Conclusion: Compared to scheduled CDs, the composite hemorrhagic adverse outcomes were significantly higher with unscheduled CDs.
Key points: · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of hemorrhage.. · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of transfusion.. · Atony treatment is higher in unscheduled cesareans..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.