{"title":"构建中青年妇科癌症患者心理压力预测模型","authors":"Yitong Qu, Yinan Zhang, Xueying Zhou, Linan Wang, Xinran Zhu, Shimei Jin, Shumei Zhuang","doi":"10.1111/jep.14244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer patients experience substantial psychological distress which causes the reduction of the quality of life. However, the risk of psychological distress has not been well predicted especially in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for psychological distress in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients using the artificial neural network (ANN).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study of young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients (<i>n</i> = 368) was conducted between March and December 2022. We used the univariate analysis to determine the factors affecting psychological distress. ANN was used for psychological distress prediction in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. Also, a traditional logistic regression (LR) model was constructed for comparison. The area under the receiver's operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model's predictive performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ANN and LR showed that self-efficacy, economic income and sleep duration were the top risk variables for psychological distress in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. The AUC of the ANN was 0.977, the sensitivity was 94.83% and the specificity was 86.44%, whereas logistic regression's were 0.920, 85.57% and 82.76%, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with the LR model, the ANN model shows obvious superiority across all assessment index outcomes, and it may be used as a decision-support tool for early identification of young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients suffering from psychological distress.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing a Predictive Model for Psychological Distress of Young- and Middle-Aged Gynaecological Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Yitong Qu, Yinan Zhang, Xueying Zhou, Linan Wang, Xinran Zhu, Shimei Jin, Shumei Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cancer patients experience substantial psychological distress which causes the reduction of the quality of life. However, the risk of psychological distress has not been well predicted especially in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for psychological distress in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients using the artificial neural network (ANN).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional study of young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients (<i>n</i> = 368) was conducted between March and December 2022. We used the univariate analysis to determine the factors affecting psychological distress. ANN was used for psychological distress prediction in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. Also, a traditional logistic regression (LR) model was constructed for comparison. The area under the receiver's operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model's predictive performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>ANN and LR showed that self-efficacy, economic income and sleep duration were the top risk variables for psychological distress in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. The AUC of the ANN was 0.977, the sensitivity was 94.83% and the specificity was 86.44%, whereas logistic regression's were 0.920, 85.57% and 82.76%, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared with the LR model, the ANN model shows obvious superiority across all assessment index outcomes, and it may be used as a decision-support tool for early identification of young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients suffering from psychological distress.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14244\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constructing a Predictive Model for Psychological Distress of Young- and Middle-Aged Gynaecological Cancer Patients
Background
Cancer patients experience substantial psychological distress which causes the reduction of the quality of life. However, the risk of psychological distress has not been well predicted especially in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for psychological distress in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients using the artificial neural network (ANN).
Methods
A cross-sectional study of young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients (n = 368) was conducted between March and December 2022. We used the univariate analysis to determine the factors affecting psychological distress. ANN was used for psychological distress prediction in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. Also, a traditional logistic regression (LR) model was constructed for comparison. The area under the receiver's operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model's predictive performance.
Results
ANN and LR showed that self-efficacy, economic income and sleep duration were the top risk variables for psychological distress in young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients. The AUC of the ANN was 0.977, the sensitivity was 94.83% and the specificity was 86.44%, whereas logistic regression's were 0.920, 85.57% and 82.76%, respectively.
Conclusion
Compared with the LR model, the ANN model shows obvious superiority across all assessment index outcomes, and it may be used as a decision-support tool for early identification of young- and middle-aged gynaecological cancer patients suffering from psychological distress.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.