Alejandro Rios-Hoyo, Kaitlyn Xiong, Jiawei Dai, Christina Yau, Michal Marczyk, Rolando Garcia-Milian, Denise M. Wolf, Laura A. Huppert, Rita Nanda, Gillian L. Hirst, Erin F. Cobain, Laura J. van 't Veer, Laura J. Esserman, Lajos Pusztai
{"title":"激素受体阳性 HER2 阴性/MammaPrint High-2 乳腺癌与三阴性乳腺癌相似","authors":"Alejandro Rios-Hoyo, Kaitlyn Xiong, Jiawei Dai, Christina Yau, Michal Marczyk, Rolando Garcia-Milian, Denise M. Wolf, Laura A. Huppert, Rita Nanda, Gillian L. Hirst, Erin F. Cobain, Laura J. van 't Veer, Laura J. Esserman, Lajos Pusztai","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The MammaPrint prognostic assay categorizes breast cancers into high- and low-risk subgroups, and the high-risk group can be further subdivided into high 1 (MP-H1), and very high-risk high-2 (MP/H-2). The aim of this analysis was to assess clinical and molecular differences between the hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (HR+) MP-H1, -H2, and triple negative (TN) MP-H1 and -H2 cancers. Experimental design: Pre-treatment gene expression data from 742 HER2 negative breast cancers enrolled in the I-SPY2 neoadjuvant trial was used. Prognostic risk categories were assigned using the MammaPrint assay. Transcriptional similarities across the 4 receptor and prognostic groups were assessed using principal component analyses and by identifying differentially expressed genes. We also examined pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survivals (EFS) by risk group. Results: Principal component analysis showed that HR+/MP-H2 tumors clustered with TN/MP-H2 cancers. Only 125 genes showed differential expression between the HR+/MP-H2 and TN/MP-H2 cancers while 1,465 genes were differentially expressed between HR+/MP-H2 and -H1. Gene set analysis revealed similarly high expression of cell cycle, DNA repair, and immune-infiltration related pathways in HR+/MP-H2 and TN/MP-H2 cancers. HR+/MP-H2 cancers also showed low estrogen receptor (ER)-related gene expression. pCR rates were similarly high in TN/MP-H2 and HR+/MP-H2 cancers (42% vs 30.5%, p=0.11), and MP-H2 cancers with residual cancer had similarly poor EFS regardless of ER status. Conclusions: In conclusion, HR+/MP-H2 cancers closely resemble TN breast cancers in transcriptional and clinical features and benefit from similar treatment strategies.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hormone Receptor Positive HER2-negative/MammaPrint High-2 Breast Cancers Closely Resemble Triple Negative Breast Cancers\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Rios-Hoyo, Kaitlyn Xiong, Jiawei Dai, Christina Yau, Michal Marczyk, Rolando Garcia-Milian, Denise M. Wolf, Laura A. Huppert, Rita Nanda, Gillian L. Hirst, Erin F. Cobain, Laura J. van 't Veer, Laura J. Esserman, Lajos Pusztai\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The MammaPrint prognostic assay categorizes breast cancers into high- and low-risk subgroups, and the high-risk group can be further subdivided into high 1 (MP-H1), and very high-risk high-2 (MP/H-2). The aim of this analysis was to assess clinical and molecular differences between the hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (HR+) MP-H1, -H2, and triple negative (TN) MP-H1 and -H2 cancers. Experimental design: Pre-treatment gene expression data from 742 HER2 negative breast cancers enrolled in the I-SPY2 neoadjuvant trial was used. Prognostic risk categories were assigned using the MammaPrint assay. Transcriptional similarities across the 4 receptor and prognostic groups were assessed using principal component analyses and by identifying differentially expressed genes. We also examined pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survivals (EFS) by risk group. Results: Principal component analysis showed that HR+/MP-H2 tumors clustered with TN/MP-H2 cancers. Only 125 genes showed differential expression between the HR+/MP-H2 and TN/MP-H2 cancers while 1,465 genes were differentially expressed between HR+/MP-H2 and -H1. Gene set analysis revealed similarly high expression of cell cycle, DNA repair, and immune-infiltration related pathways in HR+/MP-H2 and TN/MP-H2 cancers. HR+/MP-H2 cancers also showed low estrogen receptor (ER)-related gene expression. pCR rates were similarly high in TN/MP-H2 and HR+/MP-H2 cancers (42% vs 30.5%, p=0.11), and MP-H2 cancers with residual cancer had similarly poor EFS regardless of ER status. Conclusions: In conclusion, HR+/MP-H2 cancers closely resemble TN breast cancers in transcriptional and clinical features and benefit from similar treatment strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1553\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1553","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hormone Receptor Positive HER2-negative/MammaPrint High-2 Breast Cancers Closely Resemble Triple Negative Breast Cancers
Purpose: The MammaPrint prognostic assay categorizes breast cancers into high- and low-risk subgroups, and the high-risk group can be further subdivided into high 1 (MP-H1), and very high-risk high-2 (MP/H-2). The aim of this analysis was to assess clinical and molecular differences between the hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (HR+) MP-H1, -H2, and triple negative (TN) MP-H1 and -H2 cancers. Experimental design: Pre-treatment gene expression data from 742 HER2 negative breast cancers enrolled in the I-SPY2 neoadjuvant trial was used. Prognostic risk categories were assigned using the MammaPrint assay. Transcriptional similarities across the 4 receptor and prognostic groups were assessed using principal component analyses and by identifying differentially expressed genes. We also examined pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survivals (EFS) by risk group. Results: Principal component analysis showed that HR+/MP-H2 tumors clustered with TN/MP-H2 cancers. Only 125 genes showed differential expression between the HR+/MP-H2 and TN/MP-H2 cancers while 1,465 genes were differentially expressed between HR+/MP-H2 and -H1. Gene set analysis revealed similarly high expression of cell cycle, DNA repair, and immune-infiltration related pathways in HR+/MP-H2 and TN/MP-H2 cancers. HR+/MP-H2 cancers also showed low estrogen receptor (ER)-related gene expression. pCR rates were similarly high in TN/MP-H2 and HR+/MP-H2 cancers (42% vs 30.5%, p=0.11), and MP-H2 cancers with residual cancer had similarly poor EFS regardless of ER status. Conclusions: In conclusion, HR+/MP-H2 cancers closely resemble TN breast cancers in transcriptional and clinical features and benefit from similar treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.