机器人和腹腔镜 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术后的教科书结果与生存率的提高有关--倾向得分匹配分析。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Philippa Seika, Max M Maurer, Axel Winter, Ramin Raul Ossami-Saidy, Armanda Serwah, Paul V Ritschl, Jonas Raakow, Eva Dobrindt, Annika Kurreck, Johann Pratschke, Matthias Biebl, Christian Denecke
{"title":"机器人和腹腔镜 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术后的教科书结果与生存率的提高有关--倾向得分匹配分析。","authors":"Philippa Seika, Max M Maurer, Axel Winter, Ramin Raul Ossami-Saidy, Armanda Serwah, Paul V Ritschl, Jonas Raakow, Eva Dobrindt, Annika Kurreck, Johann Pratschke, Matthias Biebl, Christian Denecke","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophagectomy is central to curative therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Perioperative outcomes affect both disease-free and overall survival in oncological esophageal surgery. The adoption of robotic techniques may improve surgical outcome. However, the complex nature of perioperative outcomes is not adequately captured by individual quality measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) or robotic-assisted MIE (RAMIE) junction between 2015 and 2022 were included. Textbook outcome was defined as negative resection margins (R0), retrieval of >20 lymph nodes, no major complications, reinterventions, ICU readmission, 30-day readmission or mortality and hospital stay <21 days. Individual propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model. Factors affecting TO were evaluated using a logistic regression model while multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate TO and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 236 patients included in this study, 106 (44.91%) achieved TO. TO was achieved in 71 cases after MIE (n=71 (41.21%)) and 31 after RAMIE (n=31 (57.41%)(p=0.036). RAMIE was associated with achievement of TO (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.07-3.80; p=0.031) in the overall cohort. Achievement of TO was due to a reduction in major complications in the RAMIE group. Patients with perioperative TO had a higher 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival rate (UV: HR 2.49, 95% CI: 1.18-5.26, p=0.016; MV: HR 4.30, 95% CI: 1.60-11.55, p=0.004) compared to those without perioperative TO and disease-free survival (UV: HR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.24-4.19, p=0.008; MV: HR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.26-6.32, p=0.011) after 2 year follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAMIE is associated with an increased TO achievement. Achieving TO is associated with enhanced long-term survival in esophageal cancer patients and warrants continued emphasis on surgical quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textbook Outcome after Robotic and Laparoscopic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy is Associated with Improved Survival - A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Philippa Seika, Max M Maurer, Axel Winter, Ramin Raul Ossami-Saidy, Armanda Serwah, Paul V Ritschl, Jonas Raakow, Eva Dobrindt, Annika Kurreck, Johann Pratschke, Matthias Biebl, Christian Denecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophagectomy is central to curative therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Perioperative outcomes affect both disease-free and overall survival in oncological esophageal surgery. The adoption of robotic techniques may improve surgical outcome. However, the complex nature of perioperative outcomes is not adequately captured by individual quality measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) or robotic-assisted MIE (RAMIE) junction between 2015 and 2022 were included. Textbook outcome was defined as negative resection margins (R0), retrieval of >20 lymph nodes, no major complications, reinterventions, ICU readmission, 30-day readmission or mortality and hospital stay <21 days. Individual propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model. Factors affecting TO were evaluated using a logistic regression model while multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate TO and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 236 patients included in this study, 106 (44.91%) achieved TO. TO was achieved in 71 cases after MIE (n=71 (41.21%)) and 31 after RAMIE (n=31 (57.41%)(p=0.036). RAMIE was associated with achievement of TO (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.07-3.80; p=0.031) in the overall cohort. Achievement of TO was due to a reduction in major complications in the RAMIE group. Patients with perioperative TO had a higher 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival rate (UV: HR 2.49, 95% CI: 1.18-5.26, p=0.016; MV: HR 4.30, 95% CI: 1.60-11.55, p=0.004) compared to those without perioperative TO and disease-free survival (UV: HR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.24-4.19, p=0.008; MV: HR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.26-6.32, p=0.011) after 2 year follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAMIE is associated with an increased TO achievement. Achieving TO is associated with enhanced long-term survival in esophageal cancer patients and warrants continued emphasis on surgical quality improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.11.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食管切除术是食管癌(EC)根治性治疗的核心。围手术期的结果会影响食管肿瘤手术的无病生存率和总生存率。采用机器人技术可改善手术效果。然而,围手术期结果的复杂性并不能通过单独的质量衡量标准得到充分体现:方法:纳入2015年至2022年间所有接受微创食管切除术(MIE)或机器人辅助食管切除术(RAMIE)的患者。教科书上的结果被定义为切除边缘阴性(R0)、取回>20个淋巴结、无重大并发症、再干预、ICU再入院、30天再入院或死亡率和住院时间 结果:在纳入的236名患者中,有1名患者的切除边缘为阴性:本研究共纳入 236 例患者,其中 106 例(44.91%)实现了 TO。71例患者在MIE(71例(41.21%))和31例患者在RAMIE(31例(57.41%))后实现了TO(P=0.036)。在整个队列中,RAMIE与TO的实现相关(OR:2.01;95% CI:1.07-3.80;P=0.031)。在RAMIE组中,主要并发症的减少导致了TO的实现。围手术期TO患者的3年无病生存(DFS)率和总生存率更高(UV:HR 2.49,95% CI:1.18-5.26,p=0.016;MV:HR 4.30,95% CI:1.60-11.55,p=0.结论:RAMIE与围手术期TO和无病生存率(UV:HR 2.28,95% CI:1.24-4.19,p=0.008;MV:HR 2.82,95% CI:1.26-6.32,p=0.011)增加有关:结论:RAMIE与TO成就的增加有关。结论:RAMIE与食管癌术后长期生存率的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Textbook Outcome after Robotic and Laparoscopic Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy is Associated with Improved Survival - A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Background: Esophagectomy is central to curative therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Perioperative outcomes affect both disease-free and overall survival in oncological esophageal surgery. The adoption of robotic techniques may improve surgical outcome. However, the complex nature of perioperative outcomes is not adequately captured by individual quality measures.

Methods: All patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) or robotic-assisted MIE (RAMIE) junction between 2015 and 2022 were included. Textbook outcome was defined as negative resection margins (R0), retrieval of >20 lymph nodes, no major complications, reinterventions, ICU readmission, 30-day readmission or mortality and hospital stay <21 days. Individual propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model. Factors affecting TO were evaluated using a logistic regression model while multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate TO and survival.

Results: Of 236 patients included in this study, 106 (44.91%) achieved TO. TO was achieved in 71 cases after MIE (n=71 (41.21%)) and 31 after RAMIE (n=31 (57.41%)(p=0.036). RAMIE was associated with achievement of TO (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.07-3.80; p=0.031) in the overall cohort. Achievement of TO was due to a reduction in major complications in the RAMIE group. Patients with perioperative TO had a higher 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival rate (UV: HR 2.49, 95% CI: 1.18-5.26, p=0.016; MV: HR 4.30, 95% CI: 1.60-11.55, p=0.004) compared to those without perioperative TO and disease-free survival (UV: HR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.24-4.19, p=0.008; MV: HR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.26-6.32, p=0.011) after 2 year follow up.

Conclusions: RAMIE is associated with an increased TO achievement. Achieving TO is associated with enhanced long-term survival in esophageal cancer patients and warrants continued emphasis on surgical quality improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信