与传统关节镜相比,关节镜下使用针式关节镜进行半月板部分切除术能更好地保留术后股四头肌肌力。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Surgical technology international Pub Date : 2024-11-18
Elizabeth Ford, Manuel Pontes, Dylan Chayes, Sean McMillan
{"title":"与传统关节镜相比,关节镜下使用针式关节镜进行半月板部分切除术能更好地保留术后股四头肌肌力。","authors":"Elizabeth Ford, Manuel Pontes, Dylan Chayes, Sean McMillan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate differences in post-arthroscopic partial meniscectomy patients based upon the use of a small-bore needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope for intraoperative visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to have the visualization for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy performed with either a needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope. Prior to surgery and one-week post procedure, patients underwent peak torque isometric knee extension testing using a handheld dynamometer and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score collection. The intraoperative arthroscopic fluid volume used was collected. Exclusion criterion included: age under 18, non-English speaking, Kellen-Lawrence Grade 3 or higher, previous ipsilateral knee surgery within six months, and any patient in which arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) was not considered the primary surgical procedure. Tourniquet was not utilized for either study group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two group comparisons were performed between patients in the needle arthroscope (NA) group (n=34) and patients in the traditional arthroscope (TA) group (n=34). For the operated knee, patients in the NA group had greater postop leg strength (lbs) (24.7 vs. 18.5, t=3.76, p<0.001) and a smaller decrease in leg strength after surgery (-2.8 vs. -8.7, t=9.96, p<0.001). In contrast, results also showed that the leg strength of the non-operated leg was higher postop in both the NA group (0.6, p<0.001) and TA (0.8, p<0.001) arthroscopy group. Significantly less arthroscopic fluid was required for completion of the procedure in the NA group (479 ml) compared to patients in the TA group (2,568ml t=-38.51, p<0.001). Mean VAS score was significantly lower in the NA group (2.5) versus the TA (M=3.1, t=-3.25, p=0.002). The reduction in VAS pain scores was lower in the NA group (M=-1.8) versus the TA group (M=-1.1, t=-3.45, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a small-bore needle arthroscope for visualization during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is associated with improved retention of quadriceps function and less postoperative pain in the early postoperative period compared to a traditional arthroscope.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":"45 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Using a Needle Arthroscope for Visualization Resulted in Greater Retention of Postoperative Quadriceps Muscle Strength Compared to Traditional Arthroscope.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Ford, Manuel Pontes, Dylan Chayes, Sean McMillan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate differences in post-arthroscopic partial meniscectomy patients based upon the use of a small-bore needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope for intraoperative visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to have the visualization for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy performed with either a needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope. Prior to surgery and one-week post procedure, patients underwent peak torque isometric knee extension testing using a handheld dynamometer and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score collection. The intraoperative arthroscopic fluid volume used was collected. Exclusion criterion included: age under 18, non-English speaking, Kellen-Lawrence Grade 3 or higher, previous ipsilateral knee surgery within six months, and any patient in which arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) was not considered the primary surgical procedure. Tourniquet was not utilized for either study group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two group comparisons were performed between patients in the needle arthroscope (NA) group (n=34) and patients in the traditional arthroscope (TA) group (n=34). For the operated knee, patients in the NA group had greater postop leg strength (lbs) (24.7 vs. 18.5, t=3.76, p<0.001) and a smaller decrease in leg strength after surgery (-2.8 vs. -8.7, t=9.96, p<0.001). In contrast, results also showed that the leg strength of the non-operated leg was higher postop in both the NA group (0.6, p<0.001) and TA (0.8, p<0.001) arthroscopy group. Significantly less arthroscopic fluid was required for completion of the procedure in the NA group (479 ml) compared to patients in the TA group (2,568ml t=-38.51, p<0.001). Mean VAS score was significantly lower in the NA group (2.5) versus the TA (M=3.1, t=-3.25, p=0.002). The reduction in VAS pain scores was lower in the NA group (M=-1.8) versus the TA group (M=-1.1, t=-3.45, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a small-bore needle arthroscope for visualization during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is associated with improved retention of quadriceps function and less postoperative pain in the early postoperative period compared to a traditional arthroscope.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在前瞻性地评估关节镜部分半月板切除术后患者在术中使用小孔针关节镜或传统关节镜进行观察时的差异:68名患者以1:1的比例随机选择使用针式关节镜或传统关节镜进行关节镜下半月板部分切除术的观察。术前和术后一周,患者使用手持式测力计进行峰值扭矩等长伸膝测试,并收集视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。此外,还收集了术中使用的关节镜液体量。排除标准包括:年龄小于 18 岁、不讲英语、Kellen-Lawrence 3 级或更高、曾在 6 个月内接受过同侧膝关节手术,以及关节镜下半月板部分切除术(APM)不被视为主要手术方法的任何患者。两组研究均未使用止血带:针式关节镜(NA)组(34 人)和传统关节镜(TA)组(34 人)的患者进行了两组比较。就手术膝关节而言,NA 组患者的术后腿部力量(磅)更大(24.7 对 18.5,t=3.76,p):与传统的关节镜相比,在关节镜下进行半月板部分切除术时使用小孔针关节镜进行可视化可改善股四头肌功能的保留,并减少术后早期的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Using a Needle Arthroscope for Visualization Resulted in Greater Retention of Postoperative Quadriceps Muscle Strength Compared to Traditional Arthroscope.

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate differences in post-arthroscopic partial meniscectomy patients based upon the use of a small-bore needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope for intraoperative visualization.

Materials and methods: Sixty-eight patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to have the visualization for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy performed with either a needle arthroscope or traditional arthroscope. Prior to surgery and one-week post procedure, patients underwent peak torque isometric knee extension testing using a handheld dynamometer and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score collection. The intraoperative arthroscopic fluid volume used was collected. Exclusion criterion included: age under 18, non-English speaking, Kellen-Lawrence Grade 3 or higher, previous ipsilateral knee surgery within six months, and any patient in which arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) was not considered the primary surgical procedure. Tourniquet was not utilized for either study group.

Results: Two group comparisons were performed between patients in the needle arthroscope (NA) group (n=34) and patients in the traditional arthroscope (TA) group (n=34). For the operated knee, patients in the NA group had greater postop leg strength (lbs) (24.7 vs. 18.5, t=3.76, p<0.001) and a smaller decrease in leg strength after surgery (-2.8 vs. -8.7, t=9.96, p<0.001). In contrast, results also showed that the leg strength of the non-operated leg was higher postop in both the NA group (0.6, p<0.001) and TA (0.8, p<0.001) arthroscopy group. Significantly less arthroscopic fluid was required for completion of the procedure in the NA group (479 ml) compared to patients in the TA group (2,568ml t=-38.51, p<0.001). Mean VAS score was significantly lower in the NA group (2.5) versus the TA (M=3.1, t=-3.25, p=0.002). The reduction in VAS pain scores was lower in the NA group (M=-1.8) versus the TA group (M=-1.1, t=-3.45, p=0.001).

Conclusion: The use of a small-bore needle arthroscope for visualization during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is associated with improved retention of quadriceps function and less postoperative pain in the early postoperative period compared to a traditional arthroscope.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信