Maximilian Lothar Bamberg, Christian Grasshoff, Jessica Gerstner, Matthias Fabian Boos, Michael Bentele, Tim Viergutz, Johann Fontana, Peter Rosenberger, Robert Wunderlich
{"title":"[治疗创伤的黄金方法。优化院前创伤护理需要哪些血液制品?]","authors":"Maximilian Lothar Bamberg, Christian Grasshoff, Jessica Gerstner, Matthias Fabian Boos, Michael Bentele, Tim Viergutz, Johann Fontana, Peter Rosenberger, Robert Wunderlich","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01482-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The golden hour of trauma denotes the critical first hour after severe injury where timely medical response is crucial, although scientific support for this time frame is inconsistent. This study emphasizes optimizing trauma care by tailoring treatment to the specific injury rather than focusing solely on the speed of treatment. The aim is to document the need for improvement in prehospital trauma care, particularly by the use of blood and coagulation products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a pilot study, a purpose-designed online questionnaire targeted at German physicians and rescue service personnel was utilized to collect their views on general trauma care and specifically on the use of blood and coagulation products in prehospital settings. It also assessed the appropriateness of nine specific blood and coagulation products via a 5-point Likert scale. The percentages for each item were calculated for both physicians (n = 110) and rescue service personnel (n = 142) separately as well as an overall score to delineate patterns of agreement or disagreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reached 9837 individuals, whereby 371 initially answered the questionnaire and 252 participants from Germany were finally included in the statistical analysis. The majority of both physicians (89.1%) and rescue service personnel (90.8%) agreed on the need to improve prehospital trauma care, particularly through the use of blood and coagulation products. Specifically, 60.9% of physicians and 83.8% of rescue personnel supported the prehospital administration of these products. Red blood cell concentrates and fibrinogen were notably endorsed, with 76.2% and 67.1% approval, respectively, for their potential to enhance survival in patients with significant blood loss; however, opinions varied on other blood products.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data demonstrated a readiness to change the trauma approach and confirmed that effective options are available. The utilization of certain products is supported by existing research, underlining the need for their practical implementation in preclinical settings. Here, the emphasis shifts from the isolated time components to the quality of care delivered in an optimized time interval. Ideally, timely and high-quality care should complement each other, leveraging all available therapeutic resources. This could lead to the development of a golden approach to trauma to optimize outcomes in trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The golden approach to trauma. Which blood products are needed for optimization of prehospital trauma care?]\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Lothar Bamberg, Christian Grasshoff, Jessica Gerstner, Matthias Fabian Boos, Michael Bentele, Tim Viergutz, Johann Fontana, Peter Rosenberger, Robert Wunderlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-024-01482-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The golden hour of trauma denotes the critical first hour after severe injury where timely medical response is crucial, although scientific support for this time frame is inconsistent. This study emphasizes optimizing trauma care by tailoring treatment to the specific injury rather than focusing solely on the speed of treatment. The aim is to document the need for improvement in prehospital trauma care, particularly by the use of blood and coagulation products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After a pilot study, a purpose-designed online questionnaire targeted at German physicians and rescue service personnel was utilized to collect their views on general trauma care and specifically on the use of blood and coagulation products in prehospital settings. It also assessed the appropriateness of nine specific blood and coagulation products via a 5-point Likert scale. The percentages for each item were calculated for both physicians (n = 110) and rescue service personnel (n = 142) separately as well as an overall score to delineate patterns of agreement or disagreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study reached 9837 individuals, whereby 371 initially answered the questionnaire and 252 participants from Germany were finally included in the statistical analysis. The majority of both physicians (89.1%) and rescue service personnel (90.8%) agreed on the need to improve prehospital trauma care, particularly through the use of blood and coagulation products. Specifically, 60.9% of physicians and 83.8% of rescue personnel supported the prehospital administration of these products. Red blood cell concentrates and fibrinogen were notably endorsed, with 76.2% and 67.1% approval, respectively, for their potential to enhance survival in patients with significant blood loss; however, opinions varied on other blood products.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data demonstrated a readiness to change the trauma approach and confirmed that effective options are available. The utilization of certain products is supported by existing research, underlining the need for their practical implementation in preclinical settings. Here, the emphasis shifts from the isolated time components to the quality of care delivered in an optimized time interval. Ideally, timely and high-quality care should complement each other, leveraging all available therapeutic resources. This could lead to the development of a golden approach to trauma to optimize outcomes in trauma care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01482-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01482-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[The golden approach to trauma. Which blood products are needed for optimization of prehospital trauma care?]
Background: The golden hour of trauma denotes the critical first hour after severe injury where timely medical response is crucial, although scientific support for this time frame is inconsistent. This study emphasizes optimizing trauma care by tailoring treatment to the specific injury rather than focusing solely on the speed of treatment. The aim is to document the need for improvement in prehospital trauma care, particularly by the use of blood and coagulation products.
Methods: After a pilot study, a purpose-designed online questionnaire targeted at German physicians and rescue service personnel was utilized to collect their views on general trauma care and specifically on the use of blood and coagulation products in prehospital settings. It also assessed the appropriateness of nine specific blood and coagulation products via a 5-point Likert scale. The percentages for each item were calculated for both physicians (n = 110) and rescue service personnel (n = 142) separately as well as an overall score to delineate patterns of agreement or disagreement.
Results: The study reached 9837 individuals, whereby 371 initially answered the questionnaire and 252 participants from Germany were finally included in the statistical analysis. The majority of both physicians (89.1%) and rescue service personnel (90.8%) agreed on the need to improve prehospital trauma care, particularly through the use of blood and coagulation products. Specifically, 60.9% of physicians and 83.8% of rescue personnel supported the prehospital administration of these products. Red blood cell concentrates and fibrinogen were notably endorsed, with 76.2% and 67.1% approval, respectively, for their potential to enhance survival in patients with significant blood loss; however, opinions varied on other blood products.
Conclusion: The data demonstrated a readiness to change the trauma approach and confirmed that effective options are available. The utilization of certain products is supported by existing research, underlining the need for their practical implementation in preclinical settings. Here, the emphasis shifts from the isolated time components to the quality of care delivered in an optimized time interval. Ideally, timely and high-quality care should complement each other, leveraging all available therapeutic resources. This could lead to the development of a golden approach to trauma to optimize outcomes in trauma care.