一氧化氮吸入疗法对接受静脉-动脉体外膜氧合联合 Impella 治疗的心源性休克患者的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nobuhiro Yamada, Masafumi Ueno, Kyohei Onishi, Keishiro Sugimoto, Kazuyoshi Kakehi, Kosuke Fujita, Koichiro Matsumura, Gaku Nakazawa
{"title":"一氧化氮吸入疗法对接受静脉-动脉体外膜氧合联合 Impella 治疗的心源性休克患者的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Nobuhiro Yamada, Masafumi Ueno, Kyohei Onishi, Keishiro Sugimoto, Kazuyoshi Kakehi, Kosuke Fujita, Koichiro Matsumura, Gaku Nakazawa","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00761-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) combined with Impella (ECPELLA) support remains high. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) improves right ventricular (RV) function, resulting in increased Impella flow, which may facilitate early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival. This study investigated the prognostic impact of iNO therapy in ECPELLA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with CS supported by ECPELLA from September 2019 to March 2024 at our hospital. Changes in pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and Impella flow over time were evaluated, and VA-ECMO withdrawal rate, time to withdrawal, and 30-day survival were compared between ECPELLA patients with and without iNO therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 48 ECPELLA patients, 25 were treated with iNO. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline characteristics or lactate levels at mechanical circulatory support induction. Patients with iNO therapy demonstrated significant improvements in the PAPi over time and a trend toward increased Impella flow, as well as a significantly higher VA-ECMO withdrawal rate (88% vs. 48%, P = 0.002) and a shorter time to VA-ECMO withdrawal (5 [3-6] days vs. 7 [6-13] days, P = 0.0008) than those without iNO therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in patients with iNO than in those without (76% vs. 26%, P = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>iNO therapy in patients with CS requiring ECPELLA was associated with short-term prognosis by improving RV function and facilitating weaning from VA-ECMO. Trial registration Retrospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (Reference No. R00006352).</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"12 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Nobuhiro Yamada, Masafumi Ueno, Kyohei Onishi, Keishiro Sugimoto, Kazuyoshi Kakehi, Kosuke Fujita, Koichiro Matsumura, Gaku Nakazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40560-024-00761-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) combined with Impella (ECPELLA) support remains high. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) improves right ventricular (RV) function, resulting in increased Impella flow, which may facilitate early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival. This study investigated the prognostic impact of iNO therapy in ECPELLA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with CS supported by ECPELLA from September 2019 to March 2024 at our hospital. Changes in pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and Impella flow over time were evaluated, and VA-ECMO withdrawal rate, time to withdrawal, and 30-day survival were compared between ECPELLA patients with and without iNO therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 48 ECPELLA patients, 25 were treated with iNO. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline characteristics or lactate levels at mechanical circulatory support induction. Patients with iNO therapy demonstrated significant improvements in the PAPi over time and a trend toward increased Impella flow, as well as a significantly higher VA-ECMO withdrawal rate (88% vs. 48%, P = 0.002) and a shorter time to VA-ECMO withdrawal (5 [3-6] days vs. 7 [6-13] days, P = 0.0008) than those without iNO therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in patients with iNO than in those without (76% vs. 26%, P = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>iNO therapy in patients with CS requiring ECPELLA was associated with short-term prognosis by improving RV function and facilitating weaning from VA-ECMO. Trial registration Retrospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (Reference No. R00006352).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572410/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00761-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00761-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)联合 Impella(ECPELLA)支持的心源性休克(CS)患者的死亡率仍然很高。吸入一氧化氮(iNO)可改善右心室(RV)功能,从而增加Impella流量,这可能有助于尽早撤除VA-ECMO并提高存活率。本研究探讨了 iNO 治疗对 ECPELLA 患者预后的影响:我们回顾性分析了本院 2019 年 9 月至 2024 年 3 月期间由 ECPELLA 支持的连续 CS 患者的数据。评估了肺动脉搏动指数(PAPi)和Impella流量随时间的变化,并比较了接受和未接受iNO治疗的ECPELLA患者的VA-ECMO撤机率、撤机时间和30天生存率:48例ECPELLA患者中,25例接受了iNO治疗。两组患者的基线特征和机械循环支持诱导时的乳酸水平无明显差异。与未接受 iNO 治疗的患者相比,接受 iNO 治疗的患者随着时间的推移,PAPi 有明显改善,Impella 流量有增加的趋势,VA-ECMO 撤机率明显提高(88% vs. 48%,P = 0.002),VA-ECMO 撤机时间缩短(5 [3-6] 天 vs. 7 [6-13] 天,P = 0.0008)。Kaplan-Meier分析表明,接受iNO治疗的患者的30天存活率明显高于未接受iNO治疗的患者(76% vs. 26%,P = 0.0002)。结论:需要接受ECPELLA治疗的CS患者接受iNO治疗可改善RV功能,促进VA-ECMO的断流,从而改善短期预后。试验注册 回顾性注册于 UMIN-CTR(参考号:R00006352)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: The mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) combined with Impella (ECPELLA) support remains high. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) improves right ventricular (RV) function, resulting in increased Impella flow, which may facilitate early withdrawal of VA-ECMO and improve survival. This study investigated the prognostic impact of iNO therapy in ECPELLA patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with CS supported by ECPELLA from September 2019 to March 2024 at our hospital. Changes in pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and Impella flow over time were evaluated, and VA-ECMO withdrawal rate, time to withdrawal, and 30-day survival were compared between ECPELLA patients with and without iNO therapy.

Results: Of the 48 ECPELLA patients, 25 were treated with iNO. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline characteristics or lactate levels at mechanical circulatory support induction. Patients with iNO therapy demonstrated significant improvements in the PAPi over time and a trend toward increased Impella flow, as well as a significantly higher VA-ECMO withdrawal rate (88% vs. 48%, P = 0.002) and a shorter time to VA-ECMO withdrawal (5 [3-6] days vs. 7 [6-13] days, P = 0.0008) than those without iNO therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in patients with iNO than in those without (76% vs. 26%, P = 0.0002).

Conclusions: iNO therapy in patients with CS requiring ECPELLA was associated with short-term prognosis by improving RV function and facilitating weaning from VA-ECMO. Trial registration Retrospectively registered in UMIN-CTR (Reference No. R00006352).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信