乙醇治疗酒精戒断综合征:系统综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Darren Quelch, Nyle Davies, Claire McFauld, Arlene Copland, Carol Appleyard, Gareth Roderique-Davies, Sally Bradberry, Bev John
{"title":"乙醇治疗酒精戒断综合征:系统综述。","authors":"Darren Quelch, Nyle Davies, Claire McFauld, Arlene Copland, Carol Appleyard, Gareth Roderique-Davies, Sally Bradberry, Bev John","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2422964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alcohol withdrawal is typically managed using benzodiazepines. However, modulation of both γ-aminobutyric acid-A and N-methyl-d-aspartate-receptors through ethanol provision may provide an alternative management strategy. This systematic review critically analyses the evidence surrounding the use of oral or intravenous ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches of ProQuest - American Psychological Association, PsycInfo, MEDLINE and PubMed Central, Web of Science and Embase were performed (Prospero registration number: CRD42023425224). Search criteria were: Population = Patients receiving pharmacological interventions to treat or prevent alcohol withdrawal in a healthcare setting. Intervention = intravenous or enteral ethanol. Comparator = standard care, benzodiazepines, carbamazepine, adjunct medications including sedatives, or no comparator. Outcomes = complication rates, symptom scores, length of stay in healthcare settings. Exclusions were: preclinical studies, participants less than 18 years old, non-peer reviewed literature, poor study design or poor data quality. Study quality was assessed using an adapted National Institute for Health and Care Research quality tool. A narrative data synthesis approach was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight thousand two hundred and four studies were retrieved. Ten were included in the final analysis. Overall study quality was poor. Seven studies reported treatment outcomes that were comparable to a control arm or in which ethanol conferred no detrimental effect. Three studies reported positive outcomes, and one study reported worse outcomes following ethanol administration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The review identified heterogeneity in study design and limited reporting surrounding patient demographics, patient alcohol use history and the practicalities of ethanol administration. As such, implementation of ethanol prescribing for the management of alcohol withdrawal is currently limited due to the quality and translatability of existing data surrounding its use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are required with more transparent and complete outcome reporting and practical implementation recommendations in order to facilitate the translation of ethanol prescribing for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Darren Quelch, Nyle Davies, Claire McFauld, Arlene Copland, Carol Appleyard, Gareth Roderique-Davies, Sally Bradberry, Bev John\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15563650.2024.2422964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alcohol withdrawal is typically managed using benzodiazepines. However, modulation of both γ-aminobutyric acid-A and N-methyl-d-aspartate-receptors through ethanol provision may provide an alternative management strategy. This systematic review critically analyses the evidence surrounding the use of oral or intravenous ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches of ProQuest - American Psychological Association, PsycInfo, MEDLINE and PubMed Central, Web of Science and Embase were performed (Prospero registration number: CRD42023425224). Search criteria were: Population = Patients receiving pharmacological interventions to treat or prevent alcohol withdrawal in a healthcare setting. Intervention = intravenous or enteral ethanol. Comparator = standard care, benzodiazepines, carbamazepine, adjunct medications including sedatives, or no comparator. Outcomes = complication rates, symptom scores, length of stay in healthcare settings. Exclusions were: preclinical studies, participants less than 18 years old, non-peer reviewed literature, poor study design or poor data quality. Study quality was assessed using an adapted National Institute for Health and Care Research quality tool. A narrative data synthesis approach was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight thousand two hundred and four studies were retrieved. Ten were included in the final analysis. Overall study quality was poor. Seven studies reported treatment outcomes that were comparable to a control arm or in which ethanol conferred no detrimental effect. Three studies reported positive outcomes, and one study reported worse outcomes following ethanol administration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The review identified heterogeneity in study design and limited reporting surrounding patient demographics, patient alcohol use history and the practicalities of ethanol administration. As such, implementation of ethanol prescribing for the management of alcohol withdrawal is currently limited due to the quality and translatability of existing data surrounding its use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are required with more transparent and complete outcome reporting and practical implementation recommendations in order to facilitate the translation of ethanol prescribing for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2422964\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2422964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介戒酒通常使用苯二氮卓类药物。然而,通过乙醇调节γ-氨基丁酸-A和N-甲基-d-天冬氨酸受体可能是一种替代治疗策略。本系统综述对有关使用口服或静脉注射乙醇治疗酒精戒断综合征的证据进行了批判性分析:对 ProQuest - American Psychological Association、PsycInfo、MEDLINE 和 PubMed Central、Web of Science 和 Embase 进行了系统检索(Prospero 注册号:CRD42023425224)。搜索标准为人群 = 在医疗机构中接受药物干预以治疗或预防酒精戒断的患者。干预措施 = 静脉注射或肠道输入乙醇。参照物 = 标准护理、苯二氮卓、卡马西平、包括镇静剂在内的辅助药物或无参照物。结果 = 并发症发生率、症状评分、医疗机构住院时间。排除因素包括:临床前研究、参与者年龄小于 18 岁、非同行评审文献、研究设计不完善或数据质量不佳。研究质量采用经改编的美国国家健康与护理研究所质量工具进行评估。采用了叙述性数据综合方法:结果:共检索到 8204 项研究。最终分析纳入了 10 项研究。总体研究质量较差。七项研究报告的治疗结果与对照组相当,或乙醇不会产生有害影响。三项研究报告了积极的治疗结果,一项研究报告了服用乙醇后更糟糕的治疗结果:讨论:综述发现了研究设计的异质性,以及围绕患者人口统计学、患者饮酒史和乙醇给药实用性的有限报道。因此,由于有关乙醇使用的现有数据的质量和可转化性,目前乙醇处方治疗酒精戒断的实施受到了限制:结论:为了促进乙醇处方在酒精戒断综合症治疗中的应用,还需要进一步研究更透明、更完整的结果报告和实用的实施建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a systematic review.

Introduction: Alcohol withdrawal is typically managed using benzodiazepines. However, modulation of both γ-aminobutyric acid-A and N-methyl-d-aspartate-receptors through ethanol provision may provide an alternative management strategy. This systematic review critically analyses the evidence surrounding the use of oral or intravenous ethanol for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

Methods: Systematic searches of ProQuest - American Psychological Association, PsycInfo, MEDLINE and PubMed Central, Web of Science and Embase were performed (Prospero registration number: CRD42023425224). Search criteria were: Population = Patients receiving pharmacological interventions to treat or prevent alcohol withdrawal in a healthcare setting. Intervention = intravenous or enteral ethanol. Comparator = standard care, benzodiazepines, carbamazepine, adjunct medications including sedatives, or no comparator. Outcomes = complication rates, symptom scores, length of stay in healthcare settings. Exclusions were: preclinical studies, participants less than 18 years old, non-peer reviewed literature, poor study design or poor data quality. Study quality was assessed using an adapted National Institute for Health and Care Research quality tool. A narrative data synthesis approach was adopted.

Results: Eight thousand two hundred and four studies were retrieved. Ten were included in the final analysis. Overall study quality was poor. Seven studies reported treatment outcomes that were comparable to a control arm or in which ethanol conferred no detrimental effect. Three studies reported positive outcomes, and one study reported worse outcomes following ethanol administration.

Discussion: The review identified heterogeneity in study design and limited reporting surrounding patient demographics, patient alcohol use history and the practicalities of ethanol administration. As such, implementation of ethanol prescribing for the management of alcohol withdrawal is currently limited due to the quality and translatability of existing data surrounding its use.

Conclusions: Further studies are required with more transparent and complete outcome reporting and practical implementation recommendations in order to facilitate the translation of ethanol prescribing for the management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信