胜任、熟练和精通:16 个国际专家中心的机器人胰腺远端切除术学习曲线。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Philip C Müller, Christoph Kuemmerli, Adrian T Billeter, Baiyong Shen, Jiabin Jin, Felix Nickel, Cristiano Guidetti, Emanuele Kauffmann, Julia Purchla, Christoph Tschuor, Paul Suno Krohn, Stefan K Burgdorf, Jan Philipp Jonas, Felix J Bussmann, Olivier Saint-Marc, Abdallah Iben-Khayat, Paul C M Andel, Izaak Quintus Molenaar, Ulrich Wellner, Tobias Keck, Beat Moeckli, Christian Toso, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Valentina Valle, Pier Giulianotti, Didier Roulin, John B Martinie, Martina Rama, Harish Lavu, Charles Yeo, Parit T Mavani, Mihir M Shah, David A Kooby, Jin He, Ugo Boggi, Thilo Hackert, Inne H M Borel-Rinkes, Beat P Müller, Pierre-Alain Clavien
{"title":"胜任、熟练和精通:16 个国际专家中心的机器人胰腺远端切除术学习曲线。","authors":"Philip C Müller, Christoph Kuemmerli, Adrian T Billeter, Baiyong Shen, Jiabin Jin, Felix Nickel, Cristiano Guidetti, Emanuele Kauffmann, Julia Purchla, Christoph Tschuor, Paul Suno Krohn, Stefan K Burgdorf, Jan Philipp Jonas, Felix J Bussmann, Olivier Saint-Marc, Abdallah Iben-Khayat, Paul C M Andel, Izaak Quintus Molenaar, Ulrich Wellner, Tobias Keck, Beat Moeckli, Christian Toso, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Valentina Valle, Pier Giulianotti, Didier Roulin, John B Martinie, Martina Rama, Harish Lavu, Charles Yeo, Parit T Mavani, Mihir M Shah, David A Kooby, Jin He, Ugo Boggi, Thilo Hackert, Inne H M Borel-Rinkes, Beat P Müller, Pierre-Alain Clavien","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the different phases of the learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) in international expert centers.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>RDP is an emerging minimally invasive approach; however, only limited, mostly single center data are available on its safe implementation, including the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing elective RDP from 16 expert centers across three continents were included to assess the learning curve. Based on the first 100 RDPs at each center, three cutoffs were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Clinical outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The learning curve analysis was conducted on 1109 of 2403 RDPs. Competency, proficiency, and mastery, respectively, were reached after 46, 63, and 73 RDP procedures. After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.002). Attaining proficiency was reflected by a reduction in the rate of major complications from 20% to 15% (P=0.012), and mastery was associated with a higher proportion of patients with textbook outcome (71% vs. 63%; P=0.028). The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remained stable along the learning curve, ranging between 18.5% and 21.5%. Previous laparoscopic experience accelerated the learning process by virtue of reduced operative time and an earlier decrease in major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Competency, proficiency, and mastery for RDP were reached after 46, 63, and 73 procedures, respectively, at international expert centers. The findings highlight that the learning curves for intraoperative parameters are completed earlier; however, extensive experience is needed to master RDP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competency, Proficiency, and Mastery: Learning Curves for Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy at 16 International Expert Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Philip C Müller, Christoph Kuemmerli, Adrian T Billeter, Baiyong Shen, Jiabin Jin, Felix Nickel, Cristiano Guidetti, Emanuele Kauffmann, Julia Purchla, Christoph Tschuor, Paul Suno Krohn, Stefan K Burgdorf, Jan Philipp Jonas, Felix J Bussmann, Olivier Saint-Marc, Abdallah Iben-Khayat, Paul C M Andel, Izaak Quintus Molenaar, Ulrich Wellner, Tobias Keck, Beat Moeckli, Christian Toso, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Valentina Valle, Pier Giulianotti, Didier Roulin, John B Martinie, Martina Rama, Harish Lavu, Charles Yeo, Parit T Mavani, Mihir M Shah, David A Kooby, Jin He, Ugo Boggi, Thilo Hackert, Inne H M Borel-Rinkes, Beat P Müller, Pierre-Alain Clavien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the different phases of the learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) in international expert centers.</p><p><strong>Summary background data: </strong>RDP is an emerging minimally invasive approach; however, only limited, mostly single center data are available on its safe implementation, including the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing elective RDP from 16 expert centers across three continents were included to assess the learning curve. Based on the first 100 RDPs at each center, three cutoffs were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Clinical outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The learning curve analysis was conducted on 1109 of 2403 RDPs. Competency, proficiency, and mastery, respectively, were reached after 46, 63, and 73 RDP procedures. After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.002). Attaining proficiency was reflected by a reduction in the rate of major complications from 20% to 15% (P=0.012), and mastery was associated with a higher proportion of patients with textbook outcome (71% vs. 63%; P=0.028). The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remained stable along the learning curve, ranging between 18.5% and 21.5%. Previous laparoscopic experience accelerated the learning process by virtue of reduced operative time and an earlier decrease in major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Competency, proficiency, and mastery for RDP were reached after 46, 63, and 73 procedures, respectively, at international expert centers. The findings highlight that the learning curves for intraoperative parameters are completed earlier; however, extensive experience is needed to master RDP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006592\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估国际专家中心机器人胰腺远端切除术(RDP)学习曲线的不同阶段:RDP是一种新兴的微创方法;然而,关于其安全实施,包括学习曲线,目前仅有有限的数据,且大多为单中心数据:方法:纳入三大洲 16 个专家中心接受选择性 RDP 的连续患者,以评估学习曲线。根据每个中心的前 100 例 RDP,使用三个临界值来定义学习曲线:手术时间为合格临界值,主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级≥III)为熟练临界值,教科书结果为精通临界值。比较了截点前后的临床结果:对 2403 份 RDP 中的 1109 份进行了学习曲线分析。经过 46、63 和 73 次 RDP 手术后,分别达到了胜任、熟练和精通的程度。胜任后,手术时间从 245 分钟降至 235 分钟(P=0.002)。达到熟练程度后,主要并发症的发生率从 20% 降至 15% (P=0.012),掌握熟练程度后,获得教科书结果的患者比例更高(71% 对 63%;P=0.028)。术后胰瘘率在学习曲线上保持稳定,介于18.5%和21.5%之间。以往的腹腔镜经验缩短了手术时间,提前减少了主要并发症,从而加快了学习进程:结论:在国际专家中心,分别经过 46 例、63 例和 73 例手术后,腹腔镜手术的能力、熟练程度和掌握程度均已达到要求。研究结果表明,术中参数的学习曲线较早完成;但是,要掌握 RDP 还需要丰富的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competency, Proficiency, and Mastery: Learning Curves for Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy at 16 International Expert Centers.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the different phases of the learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) in international expert centers.

Summary background data: RDP is an emerging minimally invasive approach; however, only limited, mostly single center data are available on its safe implementation, including the learning curve.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing elective RDP from 16 expert centers across three continents were included to assess the learning curve. Based on the first 100 RDPs at each center, three cutoffs were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Clinical outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared.

Results: The learning curve analysis was conducted on 1109 of 2403 RDPs. Competency, proficiency, and mastery, respectively, were reached after 46, 63, and 73 RDP procedures. After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.002). Attaining proficiency was reflected by a reduction in the rate of major complications from 20% to 15% (P=0.012), and mastery was associated with a higher proportion of patients with textbook outcome (71% vs. 63%; P=0.028). The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remained stable along the learning curve, ranging between 18.5% and 21.5%. Previous laparoscopic experience accelerated the learning process by virtue of reduced operative time and an earlier decrease in major complications.

Conclusion: Competency, proficiency, and mastery for RDP were reached after 46, 63, and 73 procedures, respectively, at international expert centers. The findings highlight that the learning curves for intraoperative parameters are completed earlier; however, extensive experience is needed to master RDP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信