一家三级儿科医院的入院前手术药剂师服务:一项试点研究

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bruce Chio BPharm, GDipClinPharm, Syeda Farah Zahir PhD, MSc(HM), MBBS, Jenny Lee-Peters BPharm, GDipClinPharm, CHIA, Emily Elliott BPharm, BPharm(Hons), Lana Steward-Harrison BPharm, GDipClinPharm, MHLM, MSHP, Gemma Burns BPharmSci, MPharm, Sonya Stacey BPharm, PhD, FANZCAP
{"title":"一家三级儿科医院的入院前手术药剂师服务:一项试点研究","authors":"Bruce Chio BPharm, GDipClinPharm,&nbsp;Syeda Farah Zahir PhD, MSc(HM), MBBS,&nbsp;Jenny Lee-Peters BPharm, GDipClinPharm, CHIA,&nbsp;Emily Elliott BPharm, BPharm(Hons),&nbsp;Lana Steward-Harrison BPharm, GDipClinPharm, MHLM, MSHP,&nbsp;Gemma Burns BPharmSci, MPharm,&nbsp;Sonya Stacey BPharm, PhD, FANZCAP","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacist surgical preadmission review is common in adult healthcare settings, however there is little evidence of this practice in the paediatric setting. This research describes a pilot surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a paediatric hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the impact of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service on patient flow and the quality of medication management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review (2 months) was conducted to compare an intervention group (1 May 2019–30 June 2019) to historical baseline (1 October 2018–30 November 2018). Children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) presenting for elective surgery and overnight admission were included. Relevant clinical data and timestamps were extracted from the electronic medical record. Multiple linear regression models were built to examine the difference in outcomes between the control and intervention groups. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/19/QCHQ/53406). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm as it involved evaluation of an established standard of clinical care and involved the use of existing collections of records that contain only non-identifiable patient data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 135 patients were included in the baseline and 96 patients were included in the intervention group. The intervention group had statistically significant lower time to best possible medication history (BPMH) by 47.57 h (95% confidence interval [CI] −53.25 to −41.89, p &lt; 0.001). Time to prescription of home medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group by 5.26 h (95% CI −10.45 to −0.08, p = 0.05). There was no difference in proportion of patients with home medications omitted (71–62%, p = 0.38) or requiring modification (14–12%, p = 0.58) between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service in our paediatric hospital demonstrated earlier BPMH documentation and prescription of home medications, without negative effects on perioperative patient flow.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 5","pages":"393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a tertiary paediatric hospital: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Chio BPharm, GDipClinPharm,&nbsp;Syeda Farah Zahir PhD, MSc(HM), MBBS,&nbsp;Jenny Lee-Peters BPharm, GDipClinPharm, CHIA,&nbsp;Emily Elliott BPharm, BPharm(Hons),&nbsp;Lana Steward-Harrison BPharm, GDipClinPharm, MHLM, MSHP,&nbsp;Gemma Burns BPharmSci, MPharm,&nbsp;Sonya Stacey BPharm, PhD, FANZCAP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pharmacist surgical preadmission review is common in adult healthcare settings, however there is little evidence of this practice in the paediatric setting. This research describes a pilot surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a paediatric hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the impact of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service on patient flow and the quality of medication management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective review (2 months) was conducted to compare an intervention group (1 May 2019–30 June 2019) to historical baseline (1 October 2018–30 November 2018). Children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) presenting for elective surgery and overnight admission were included. Relevant clinical data and timestamps were extracted from the electronic medical record. Multiple linear regression models were built to examine the difference in outcomes between the control and intervention groups. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/19/QCHQ/53406). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm as it involved evaluation of an established standard of clinical care and involved the use of existing collections of records that contain only non-identifiable patient data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 135 patients were included in the baseline and 96 patients were included in the intervention group. The intervention group had statistically significant lower time to best possible medication history (BPMH) by 47.57 h (95% confidence interval [CI] −53.25 to −41.89, p &lt; 0.001). Time to prescription of home medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group by 5.26 h (95% CI −10.45 to −0.08, p = 0.05). There was no difference in proportion of patients with home medications omitted (71–62%, p = 0.38) or requiring modification (14–12%, p = 0.58) between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implementation of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service in our paediatric hospital demonstrated earlier BPMH documentation and prescription of home medications, without negative effects on perioperative patient flow.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"393-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景药剂师的手术入院前审查在成人医疗机构中很常见,但在儿科医疗机构中却鲜有这种做法的证据。本研究介绍了在一家儿科医院试行的入院前手术药剂师服务。 目的 评估手术入院前药剂师服务对患者流程和药物管理质量的影响。 方法 对干预组(2019 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日)与历史基线(2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日)进行回顾性审查(2 个月)。纳入了前来接受择期手术和过夜入院的儿童和青少年(0-18 岁)。从电子病历中提取了相关临床数据和时间戳。建立多元线性回归模型,以检验对照组和干预组之间的结果差异。根据昆士兰儿童医院人类研究伦理委员会(参考编号:LNR/19/QCHQ/53406)的当地研究政策要求,该项目获得豁免。豁免理由如下:该研究不存在可预见的伤害患者的风险,因为它涉及对既定临床护理标准的评估,并涉及使用仅包含不可识别患者数据的现有记录集。 结果 共有 135 名患者被纳入基线组,96 名患者被纳入干预组。干预组的最佳用药史(BPMH)时间明显缩短了 47.57 小时(95% 置信区间 [CI] -53.25 至 -41.89,p < 0.001)。干预组开具家庭用药处方的时间明显缩短了 5.26 小时(95% 置信区间 -10.45 至 -0.08,P = 0.05)。两组患者省略家庭用药的比例(71-62%,p = 0.38)或需要修改的比例(14-12%,p = 0.58)没有差异。 结论 在我们的儿科医院实施手术入院前药剂师服务后,可以更早地记录 BPMH 和开具家庭用药处方,而不会对围手术期患者的流程产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a tertiary paediatric hospital: a pilot study

Background

Pharmacist surgical preadmission review is common in adult healthcare settings, however there is little evidence of this practice in the paediatric setting. This research describes a pilot surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a paediatric hospital.

Aim

To evaluate the impact of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service on patient flow and the quality of medication management.

Method

A retrospective review (2 months) was conducted to compare an intervention group (1 May 2019–30 June 2019) to historical baseline (1 October 2018–30 November 2018). Children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) presenting for elective surgery and overnight admission were included. Relevant clinical data and timestamps were extracted from the electronic medical record. Multiple linear regression models were built to examine the difference in outcomes between the control and intervention groups. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/19/QCHQ/53406). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm as it involved evaluation of an established standard of clinical care and involved the use of existing collections of records that contain only non-identifiable patient data.

Results

In total, 135 patients were included in the baseline and 96 patients were included in the intervention group. The intervention group had statistically significant lower time to best possible medication history (BPMH) by 47.57 h (95% confidence interval [CI] −53.25 to −41.89, p < 0.001). Time to prescription of home medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group by 5.26 h (95% CI −10.45 to −0.08, p = 0.05). There was no difference in proportion of patients with home medications omitted (71–62%, p = 0.38) or requiring modification (14–12%, p = 0.58) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Implementation of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service in our paediatric hospital demonstrated earlier BPMH documentation and prescription of home medications, without negative effects on perioperative patient flow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信