{"title":"一家三级儿科医院的入院前手术药剂师服务:一项试点研究","authors":"Bruce Chio BPharm, GDipClinPharm, Syeda Farah Zahir PhD, MSc(HM), MBBS, Jenny Lee-Peters BPharm, GDipClinPharm, CHIA, Emily Elliott BPharm, BPharm(Hons), Lana Steward-Harrison BPharm, GDipClinPharm, MHLM, MSHP, Gemma Burns BPharmSci, MPharm, Sonya Stacey BPharm, PhD, FANZCAP","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacist surgical preadmission review is common in adult healthcare settings, however there is little evidence of this practice in the paediatric setting. This research describes a pilot surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a paediatric hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the impact of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service on patient flow and the quality of medication management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review (2 months) was conducted to compare an intervention group (1 May 2019–30 June 2019) to historical baseline (1 October 2018–30 November 2018). Children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) presenting for elective surgery and overnight admission were included. Relevant clinical data and timestamps were extracted from the electronic medical record. Multiple linear regression models were built to examine the difference in outcomes between the control and intervention groups. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/19/QCHQ/53406). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm as it involved evaluation of an established standard of clinical care and involved the use of existing collections of records that contain only non-identifiable patient data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 135 patients were included in the baseline and 96 patients were included in the intervention group. The intervention group had statistically significant lower time to best possible medication history (BPMH) by 47.57 h (95% confidence interval [CI] −53.25 to −41.89, p < 0.001). Time to prescription of home medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group by 5.26 h (95% CI −10.45 to −0.08, p = 0.05). There was no difference in proportion of patients with home medications omitted (71–62%, p = 0.38) or requiring modification (14–12%, p = 0.58) between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service in our paediatric hospital demonstrated earlier BPMH documentation and prescription of home medications, without negative effects on perioperative patient flow.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 5","pages":"393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a tertiary paediatric hospital: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Chio BPharm, GDipClinPharm, Syeda Farah Zahir PhD, MSc(HM), MBBS, Jenny Lee-Peters BPharm, GDipClinPharm, CHIA, Emily Elliott BPharm, BPharm(Hons), Lana Steward-Harrison BPharm, GDipClinPharm, MHLM, MSHP, Gemma Burns BPharmSci, MPharm, Sonya Stacey BPharm, PhD, FANZCAP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pharmacist surgical preadmission review is common in adult healthcare settings, however there is little evidence of this practice in the paediatric setting. This research describes a pilot surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a paediatric hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the impact of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service on patient flow and the quality of medication management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective review (2 months) was conducted to compare an intervention group (1 May 2019–30 June 2019) to historical baseline (1 October 2018–30 November 2018). Children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) presenting for elective surgery and overnight admission were included. Relevant clinical data and timestamps were extracted from the electronic medical record. Multiple linear regression models were built to examine the difference in outcomes between the control and intervention groups. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/19/QCHQ/53406). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm as it involved evaluation of an established standard of clinical care and involved the use of existing collections of records that contain only non-identifiable patient data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 135 patients were included in the baseline and 96 patients were included in the intervention group. The intervention group had statistically significant lower time to best possible medication history (BPMH) by 47.57 h (95% confidence interval [CI] −53.25 to −41.89, p < 0.001). Time to prescription of home medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group by 5.26 h (95% CI −10.45 to −0.08, p = 0.05). There was no difference in proportion of patients with home medications omitted (71–62%, p = 0.38) or requiring modification (14–12%, p = 0.58) between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implementation of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service in our paediatric hospital demonstrated earlier BPMH documentation and prescription of home medications, without negative effects on perioperative patient flow.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"393-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a tertiary paediatric hospital: a pilot study
Background
Pharmacist surgical preadmission review is common in adult healthcare settings, however there is little evidence of this practice in the paediatric setting. This research describes a pilot surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a paediatric hospital.
Aim
To evaluate the impact of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service on patient flow and the quality of medication management.
Method
A retrospective review (2 months) was conducted to compare an intervention group (1 May 2019–30 June 2019) to historical baseline (1 October 2018–30 November 2018). Children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years) presenting for elective surgery and overnight admission were included. Relevant clinical data and timestamps were extracted from the electronic medical record. Multiple linear regression models were built to examine the difference in outcomes between the control and intervention groups. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Queensland Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: LNR/19/QCHQ/53406). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm as it involved evaluation of an established standard of clinical care and involved the use of existing collections of records that contain only non-identifiable patient data.
Results
In total, 135 patients were included in the baseline and 96 patients were included in the intervention group. The intervention group had statistically significant lower time to best possible medication history (BPMH) by 47.57 h (95% confidence interval [CI] −53.25 to −41.89, p < 0.001). Time to prescription of home medications was significantly reduced in the intervention group by 5.26 h (95% CI −10.45 to −0.08, p = 0.05). There was no difference in proportion of patients with home medications omitted (71–62%, p = 0.38) or requiring modification (14–12%, p = 0.58) between the two groups.
Conclusion
Implementation of a surgical preadmission pharmacist service in our paediatric hospital demonstrated earlier BPMH documentation and prescription of home medications, without negative effects on perioperative patient flow.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.