{"title":"澳大利亚的活性成分处方:探索药剂师的经验","authors":"Taylah Swifte BPharm, MPharm, Michelle Bowden BPharm, GradDipClinPharm, Henry Ndukwe BPharm, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The Active Ingredient Prescribing (AIP) mandate was introduced Australia-wide on 1 February 2021. The AIP legislation makes the pharmacist a stakeholder who can provide valuable information to customers and patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the experiences of community pharmacists with AIP legislation with a focus on attitude, health literacy, and medication safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted and guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Transcripts were analysed using a deductive approach to categorise data and inductive thematic analysis to identify concepts and themes. Ethical approval was granted by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 2021/878) and the study conforms to the <i>Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research</i>. Informed consent from all participants was obtained via a study information sheet distributed to all potential participants and completion of written consent forms prior to participation in the study. Participants received gift cards as compensation for their time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six pharmacists participated, and thematic analysis of collected data revealed three main themes. These included education, integration, and trust. Insights on patients' acceptance of their prescriptions and the expanded patient-facing opportunities were highlighted. Participants' opinions leaned towards enhancing the smooth integration into the AIP process of other stakeholders like prescribers and regulatory bodies. Establishing multilevel communication between stakeholders and customers was pivotal to improving health literacy and medication safety. Pharmacists' views on process integration provided unique insight into the practical challenges with the AIP mandate. In addition, ‘trust’ in the prescriber enhanced patient acceptance of generic medicines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study provided baseline evidence to show that the AIP mandate enhances health literacy and empowers patients to know the active ingredients in their medicines, which in turn supports medication safety. Examining the implementation of the AIP legislation facilitated a nuanced understanding of the effect that these AIP changes have on patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"54 5","pages":"402-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1935","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active Ingredient Prescribing in Australia: exploring pharmacists' experiences\",\"authors\":\"Taylah Swifte BPharm, MPharm, Michelle Bowden BPharm, GradDipClinPharm, Henry Ndukwe BPharm, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Active Ingredient Prescribing (AIP) mandate was introduced Australia-wide on 1 February 2021. The AIP legislation makes the pharmacist a stakeholder who can provide valuable information to customers and patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the experiences of community pharmacists with AIP legislation with a focus on attitude, health literacy, and medication safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted and guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Transcripts were analysed using a deductive approach to categorise data and inductive thematic analysis to identify concepts and themes. Ethical approval was granted by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 2021/878) and the study conforms to the <i>Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research</i>. Informed consent from all participants was obtained via a study information sheet distributed to all potential participants and completion of written consent forms prior to participation in the study. Participants received gift cards as compensation for their time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Six pharmacists participated, and thematic analysis of collected data revealed three main themes. These included education, integration, and trust. Insights on patients' acceptance of their prescriptions and the expanded patient-facing opportunities were highlighted. Participants' opinions leaned towards enhancing the smooth integration into the AIP process of other stakeholders like prescribers and regulatory bodies. Establishing multilevel communication between stakeholders and customers was pivotal to improving health literacy and medication safety. Pharmacists' views on process integration provided unique insight into the practical challenges with the AIP mandate. In addition, ‘trust’ in the prescriber enhanced patient acceptance of generic medicines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study provided baseline evidence to show that the AIP mandate enhances health literacy and empowers patients to know the active ingredients in their medicines, which in turn supports medication safety. Examining the implementation of the AIP legislation facilitated a nuanced understanding of the effect that these AIP changes have on patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"402-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1935\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1935\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Active Ingredient Prescribing in Australia: exploring pharmacists' experiences
Background
The Active Ingredient Prescribing (AIP) mandate was introduced Australia-wide on 1 February 2021. The AIP legislation makes the pharmacist a stakeholder who can provide valuable information to customers and patients.
Aim
To explore the experiences of community pharmacists with AIP legislation with a focus on attitude, health literacy, and medication safety.
Method
Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted and guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Transcripts were analysed using a deductive approach to categorise data and inductive thematic analysis to identify concepts and themes. Ethical approval was granted by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 2021/878) and the study conforms to the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Informed consent from all participants was obtained via a study information sheet distributed to all potential participants and completion of written consent forms prior to participation in the study. Participants received gift cards as compensation for their time.
Results
Six pharmacists participated, and thematic analysis of collected data revealed three main themes. These included education, integration, and trust. Insights on patients' acceptance of their prescriptions and the expanded patient-facing opportunities were highlighted. Participants' opinions leaned towards enhancing the smooth integration into the AIP process of other stakeholders like prescribers and regulatory bodies. Establishing multilevel communication between stakeholders and customers was pivotal to improving health literacy and medication safety. Pharmacists' views on process integration provided unique insight into the practical challenges with the AIP mandate. In addition, ‘trust’ in the prescriber enhanced patient acceptance of generic medicines.
Conclusion
The study provided baseline evidence to show that the AIP mandate enhances health literacy and empowers patients to know the active ingredients in their medicines, which in turn supports medication safety. Examining the implementation of the AIP legislation facilitated a nuanced understanding of the effect that these AIP changes have on patients.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.