Abdul-Hakeem A. Sheet , Safwan Y. Al-Baroodi , Mohammad O. Dahl
{"title":"比较三明治酶联免疫吸附法和 PCR 检测绵羊和山羊小反刍兽疫的效果","authors":"Abdul-Hakeem A. Sheet , Safwan Y. Al-Baroodi , Mohammad O. Dahl","doi":"10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of sandwich ELISA compared to the RT-PCR technique in detecting Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) infection in clinically diseased sheep and goats. A secondary objective was to compare the results of N-gene- and F-gene-based RT-PCR in identifying PPR infection. Blood samples and nasal swabs were collected from 400 animals (335 sheep and 65 goats) exhibiting clinical signs of PPR in different flocks in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. Serum samples were tested using s-ELISA, whereas nasal swabs were tested using RT-PCR. The analysis indicated that s-ELISA, N-gene RT-PPR, and F-gene RT-PCR had 43 %, 40 %, and 34 %, respectively, positive results. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio of s-ELISA were 0.93, 94 %, 92 %, 88 %, 96 %, and 185, respectively. A total of 25 (16 %) samples positive with N-gene RT-PCR tested negative with F-gene RT-PCR. In conclusion, although we performed RT-PCR using nasal swabs and s-ELISA using serum samples, s-ELISA can be a practical test alternative to RT-PCR for detecting PPR infection in serum samples from sheep and goats observing clinical signs of the disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21758,"journal":{"name":"Small Ruminant Research","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 107387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the efficacy of Sandwich ELISA with PCR for detecting Peste des Petits Ruminants in sheep and goats\",\"authors\":\"Abdul-Hakeem A. Sheet , Safwan Y. Al-Baroodi , Mohammad O. Dahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The primary objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of sandwich ELISA compared to the RT-PCR technique in detecting Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) infection in clinically diseased sheep and goats. A secondary objective was to compare the results of N-gene- and F-gene-based RT-PCR in identifying PPR infection. Blood samples and nasal swabs were collected from 400 animals (335 sheep and 65 goats) exhibiting clinical signs of PPR in different flocks in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. Serum samples were tested using s-ELISA, whereas nasal swabs were tested using RT-PCR. The analysis indicated that s-ELISA, N-gene RT-PPR, and F-gene RT-PCR had 43 %, 40 %, and 34 %, respectively, positive results. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio of s-ELISA were 0.93, 94 %, 92 %, 88 %, 96 %, and 185, respectively. A total of 25 (16 %) samples positive with N-gene RT-PCR tested negative with F-gene RT-PCR. In conclusion, although we performed RT-PCR using nasal swabs and s-ELISA using serum samples, s-ELISA can be a practical test alternative to RT-PCR for detecting PPR infection in serum samples from sheep and goats observing clinical signs of the disease.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Small Ruminant Research\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Small Ruminant Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001937\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Ruminant Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448824001937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the efficacy of Sandwich ELISA with PCR for detecting Peste des Petits Ruminants in sheep and goats
The primary objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of sandwich ELISA compared to the RT-PCR technique in detecting Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) infection in clinically diseased sheep and goats. A secondary objective was to compare the results of N-gene- and F-gene-based RT-PCR in identifying PPR infection. Blood samples and nasal swabs were collected from 400 animals (335 sheep and 65 goats) exhibiting clinical signs of PPR in different flocks in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. Serum samples were tested using s-ELISA, whereas nasal swabs were tested using RT-PCR. The analysis indicated that s-ELISA, N-gene RT-PPR, and F-gene RT-PCR had 43 %, 40 %, and 34 %, respectively, positive results. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio of s-ELISA were 0.93, 94 %, 92 %, 88 %, 96 %, and 185, respectively. A total of 25 (16 %) samples positive with N-gene RT-PCR tested negative with F-gene RT-PCR. In conclusion, although we performed RT-PCR using nasal swabs and s-ELISA using serum samples, s-ELISA can be a practical test alternative to RT-PCR for detecting PPR infection in serum samples from sheep and goats observing clinical signs of the disease.
期刊介绍:
Small Ruminant Research publishes original, basic and applied research articles, technical notes, and review articles on research relating to goats, sheep, deer, the New World camelids llama, alpaca, vicuna and guanaco, and the Old World camels.
Topics covered include nutrition, physiology, anatomy, genetics, microbiology, ethology, product technology, socio-economics, management, sustainability and environment, veterinary medicine and husbandry engineering.