Y. Çelik , A. Stankovskiy , H. Iwamoto , Y. Iwamoto , G. Van den Eynde
{"title":"使用 MCNP、PHITS 和 FLUKA 进行内置物理模型和质子诱导核数据验证 - 对质子加速器设施屏蔽设计的影响","authors":"Y. Çelik , A. Stankovskiy , H. Iwamoto , Y. Iwamoto , G. Van den Eynde","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The MCNP, PHITS, and FLUKA are general-purpose Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport codes that are widely used for many real-world shielding problems at accelerator facilities around the world. Nuclear interactions are described in these codes by either built-in physics models, or tables with evaluated cross sections and secondary energy-angular distributions, or a combination of both. Over the decades, many code validation efforts have been made, owing to the availability of shielding benchmarks to test the physics models and nuclear data and to verify the accuracy of simulation codes.</div><div>For high beam energy and high beam current accelerator applications, neutron emission through the vacuum pipe along the reverse direction of incident proton beam is an important factor for a shielding design in order to correctly assess the dose rates for workers and the structural materials of the accelerator and handle with the waste activated by the backscattered neutron fluxes. In this work, neutron-production cross sections and thick-target yield predictions from MC codes relying on physics models and nuclear data libraries are benchmarked against the experimental data, in order to assess their accuracy in predicting neutron emission and furthermore to assess the corresponding impact on shielding design.</div><div>The results of this study demonstrate that the nuclear data libraries and physics models, which are not expected to give good results at lower energies (< 150 MeV) but are used anyhow when there is no nuclear data available or above the energy range where the data tables end in the so-called “mix-and-match” strategy, need further improvements. Among the investigated proton induced nuclear data libraries, JENDL-4.0/HE produces the most satisfactory agreement to experimental data for all target materials, but may still benefit from refinement. Concerning the physics models of the codes, FLUKA V4-4.0 has the best performance in terms of reproducibility of the experimental values. It is also shown that all discrepancies between the calculations and the experiments for the energy range < 10 MeV (which is dominant on the dose rates through the shield thickness), are up to factor of two. This might be considered as an acceptable figure as it is equivalent to a normal safety margin (x2) considered in shielding calculations of accelerator facilities around the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 111048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Built-in physics models and proton-induced nuclear data validation using MCNP, PHITS, and FLUKA – Impact on the shielding design for proton accelerator facilities\",\"authors\":\"Y. Çelik , A. Stankovskiy , H. Iwamoto , Y. Iwamoto , G. Van den Eynde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The MCNP, PHITS, and FLUKA are general-purpose Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport codes that are widely used for many real-world shielding problems at accelerator facilities around the world. Nuclear interactions are described in these codes by either built-in physics models, or tables with evaluated cross sections and secondary energy-angular distributions, or a combination of both. Over the decades, many code validation efforts have been made, owing to the availability of shielding benchmarks to test the physics models and nuclear data and to verify the accuracy of simulation codes.</div><div>For high beam energy and high beam current accelerator applications, neutron emission through the vacuum pipe along the reverse direction of incident proton beam is an important factor for a shielding design in order to correctly assess the dose rates for workers and the structural materials of the accelerator and handle with the waste activated by the backscattered neutron fluxes. In this work, neutron-production cross sections and thick-target yield predictions from MC codes relying on physics models and nuclear data libraries are benchmarked against the experimental data, in order to assess their accuracy in predicting neutron emission and furthermore to assess the corresponding impact on shielding design.</div><div>The results of this study demonstrate that the nuclear data libraries and physics models, which are not expected to give good results at lower energies (< 150 MeV) but are used anyhow when there is no nuclear data available or above the energy range where the data tables end in the so-called “mix-and-match” strategy, need further improvements. Among the investigated proton induced nuclear data libraries, JENDL-4.0/HE produces the most satisfactory agreement to experimental data for all target materials, but may still benefit from refinement. Concerning the physics models of the codes, FLUKA V4-4.0 has the best performance in terms of reproducibility of the experimental values. It is also shown that all discrepancies between the calculations and the experiments for the energy range < 10 MeV (which is dominant on the dose rates through the shield thickness), are up to factor of two. This might be considered as an acceptable figure as it is equivalent to a normal safety margin (x2) considered in shielding calculations of accelerator facilities around the world.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Nuclear Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924007114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Built-in physics models and proton-induced nuclear data validation using MCNP, PHITS, and FLUKA – Impact on the shielding design for proton accelerator facilities
The MCNP, PHITS, and FLUKA are general-purpose Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport codes that are widely used for many real-world shielding problems at accelerator facilities around the world. Nuclear interactions are described in these codes by either built-in physics models, or tables with evaluated cross sections and secondary energy-angular distributions, or a combination of both. Over the decades, many code validation efforts have been made, owing to the availability of shielding benchmarks to test the physics models and nuclear data and to verify the accuracy of simulation codes.
For high beam energy and high beam current accelerator applications, neutron emission through the vacuum pipe along the reverse direction of incident proton beam is an important factor for a shielding design in order to correctly assess the dose rates for workers and the structural materials of the accelerator and handle with the waste activated by the backscattered neutron fluxes. In this work, neutron-production cross sections and thick-target yield predictions from MC codes relying on physics models and nuclear data libraries are benchmarked against the experimental data, in order to assess their accuracy in predicting neutron emission and furthermore to assess the corresponding impact on shielding design.
The results of this study demonstrate that the nuclear data libraries and physics models, which are not expected to give good results at lower energies (< 150 MeV) but are used anyhow when there is no nuclear data available or above the energy range where the data tables end in the so-called “mix-and-match” strategy, need further improvements. Among the investigated proton induced nuclear data libraries, JENDL-4.0/HE produces the most satisfactory agreement to experimental data for all target materials, but may still benefit from refinement. Concerning the physics models of the codes, FLUKA V4-4.0 has the best performance in terms of reproducibility of the experimental values. It is also shown that all discrepancies between the calculations and the experiments for the energy range < 10 MeV (which is dominant on the dose rates through the shield thickness), are up to factor of two. This might be considered as an acceptable figure as it is equivalent to a normal safety margin (x2) considered in shielding calculations of accelerator facilities around the world.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.