三十年来失败的银行收购

IF 3.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Laima Spokeviciute , Hossein Jahanshahloo , Kevin Keasey , Francesco Vallascas
{"title":"三十年来失败的银行收购","authors":"Laima Spokeviciute ,&nbsp;Hossein Jahanshahloo ,&nbsp;Kevin Keasey ,&nbsp;Francesco Vallascas","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using more than 30 years of data, we document that the acquisition of failed US commercial banks through FDIC-managed Purchase and Assumption (P&amp;A) transactions leads to long-term improvements in the profitability and loan risk of the combined entity and has no detrimental effects on its capital adequacy. These results are generally stronger for transactions with greater potential for economies of scale and efficiency gains. Furthermore, geographic similarity in the branch network of the acquirer and the target marginally improves the profitability of the combined entity, while a greater business similarity between the merged banks has no effect on deal outcomes. Additional tests show that the presence of regulatory subsidies also improves the profitability of the combined entity. Finally, we find no support for theoretical predictions about the misallocation of failed bank assets in the presence of widespread failures in local markets. Our findings are important for the understanding of the consequences of bank resolution through assisted M&amp;As.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 107336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three decades of failed bank acquisitions\",\"authors\":\"Laima Spokeviciute ,&nbsp;Hossein Jahanshahloo ,&nbsp;Kevin Keasey ,&nbsp;Francesco Vallascas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using more than 30 years of data, we document that the acquisition of failed US commercial banks through FDIC-managed Purchase and Assumption (P&amp;A) transactions leads to long-term improvements in the profitability and loan risk of the combined entity and has no detrimental effects on its capital adequacy. These results are generally stronger for transactions with greater potential for economies of scale and efficiency gains. Furthermore, geographic similarity in the branch network of the acquirer and the target marginally improves the profitability of the combined entity, while a greater business similarity between the merged banks has no effect on deal outcomes. Additional tests show that the presence of regulatory subsidies also improves the profitability of the combined entity. Finally, we find no support for theoretical predictions about the misallocation of failed bank assets in the presence of widespread failures in local markets. Our findings are important for the understanding of the consequences of bank resolution through assisted M&amp;As.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624002504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624002504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用 30 多年的数据证明,通过联邦存款保险公司管理的购买和承担(P&A)交易收购倒闭的美国商业银行,可长期改善合并后实体的盈利能力和贷款风险,而且对其资本充足率没有不利影响。对于规模经济和增效潜力较大的交易而言,上述结果通常更为显著。此外,并购方与目标方分行网络的地理相似性会略微提高合并后实体的盈利能力,而合并后银行之间更大的业务相似性对交易结果没有影响。其他测试表明,监管补贴的存在也会提高合并后实体的盈利能力。最后,我们发现在当地市场普遍倒闭的情况下,关于倒闭银行资产配置不当的理论预测并不成立。我们的发现对于理解通过协助并购解决银行问题的后果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three decades of failed bank acquisitions
Using more than 30 years of data, we document that the acquisition of failed US commercial banks through FDIC-managed Purchase and Assumption (P&A) transactions leads to long-term improvements in the profitability and loan risk of the combined entity and has no detrimental effects on its capital adequacy. These results are generally stronger for transactions with greater potential for economies of scale and efficiency gains. Furthermore, geographic similarity in the branch network of the acquirer and the target marginally improves the profitability of the combined entity, while a greater business similarity between the merged banks has no effect on deal outcomes. Additional tests show that the presence of regulatory subsidies also improves the profitability of the combined entity. Finally, we find no support for theoretical predictions about the misallocation of failed bank assets in the presence of widespread failures in local markets. Our findings are important for the understanding of the consequences of bank resolution through assisted M&As.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信