转染融合重组阳性非小细胞肺癌患者在普拉塞替尼诱导疾病进展后对赛乐西替尼的颅内反应:病例报告

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Illaa Smesseim MD, Tijmen van der Wel MD, Sushil K. Badrising MD, PhD
{"title":"转染融合重组阳性非小细胞肺癌患者在普拉塞替尼诱导疾病进展后对赛乐西替尼的颅内反应:病例报告","authors":"Illaa Smesseim MD,&nbsp;Tijmen van der Wel MD,&nbsp;Sushil K. Badrising MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>RET fusion-positive NSCLC accounts for 1% to 2% of lung carcinoma cases. Although two Food and Drug Administration–approved selective RET inhibitors, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, have revealed efficacy in managing RET fusion-positive NSCLC, this case series is unique in its focus on the intracranial response to selpercatinib after disease progression during pralsetinib treatment. This report contributes to the literature by providing evidence of selpercatinib’s potential as a treatment option in such refractory cases. The patients described in both cases were diagnosed with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC and developed intracranial metastases during pralsetinib treatment. After switching to selpercatinib, both exhibited significant intracranial responses. The first patient reported a reduction in brain metastasis size and maintained a response for over 1.5 years. The second patient also responded intracranially to selpercatinib but unfortunately passed away 8 months later owing to pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly linked to prior radiation treatment. These cases highlight the potential efficacy of selpercatinib in treating intracranial metastases in RET fusion-positive patients with NSCLC after pralsetinib-refractory progression. The key takeaway is that selpercatinib may offer a viable treatment option in such scenarios, although more extensive studies are needed to determine its role as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"5 12","pages":"Article 100730"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial Response to Selpercatinib After Pralsetinib-Induced Disease Progression in Rearranged During Transfection Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report\",\"authors\":\"Illaa Smesseim MD,&nbsp;Tijmen van der Wel MD,&nbsp;Sushil K. Badrising MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>RET fusion-positive NSCLC accounts for 1% to 2% of lung carcinoma cases. Although two Food and Drug Administration–approved selective RET inhibitors, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, have revealed efficacy in managing RET fusion-positive NSCLC, this case series is unique in its focus on the intracranial response to selpercatinib after disease progression during pralsetinib treatment. This report contributes to the literature by providing evidence of selpercatinib’s potential as a treatment option in such refractory cases. The patients described in both cases were diagnosed with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC and developed intracranial metastases during pralsetinib treatment. After switching to selpercatinib, both exhibited significant intracranial responses. The first patient reported a reduction in brain metastasis size and maintained a response for over 1.5 years. The second patient also responded intracranially to selpercatinib but unfortunately passed away 8 months later owing to pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly linked to prior radiation treatment. These cases highlight the potential efficacy of selpercatinib in treating intracranial metastases in RET fusion-positive patients with NSCLC after pralsetinib-refractory progression. The key takeaway is that selpercatinib may offer a viable treatment option in such scenarios, although more extensive studies are needed to determine its role as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324001000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324001000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

RET融合阳性NSCLC占肺癌病例的1%至2%。虽然美国食品和药物管理局批准的两种选择性RET抑制剂普拉塞替尼和色瑞帕替尼在治疗RET融合阳性NSCLC方面具有疗效,但本系列病例的独特之处在于它关注了普拉塞替尼治疗期间疾病进展后对色瑞帕替尼的颅内反应。本报告提供了证据,证明赛乐替尼有可能成为此类难治性病例的治疗选择,从而为文献做出了贡献。两例患者均被诊断为转移性RET融合阳性NSCLC,并在普拉塞替尼治疗期间出现颅内转移。在改用赛帕替尼治疗后,两例患者均出现了明显的颅内反应。第一例患者的脑转移灶缩小,并在超过1.5年的时间里一直保持着这种反应。第二名患者也对赛帕替尼产生了颅内反应,但不幸在8个月后因肺出血去世,这可能与之前的放射治疗有关。这些病例凸显了色瑞帕替尼治疗普拉塞替尼难治性进展后RET融合阳性NSCLC患者颅内转移的潜在疗效。尽管还需要进行更广泛的研究来确定其作为单一疗法或与其他疗法联合使用的作用,但关键的启示是,在这种情况下,赛帕替尼可能是一种可行的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial Response to Selpercatinib After Pralsetinib-Induced Disease Progression in Rearranged During Transfection Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report
RET fusion-positive NSCLC accounts for 1% to 2% of lung carcinoma cases. Although two Food and Drug Administration–approved selective RET inhibitors, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, have revealed efficacy in managing RET fusion-positive NSCLC, this case series is unique in its focus on the intracranial response to selpercatinib after disease progression during pralsetinib treatment. This report contributes to the literature by providing evidence of selpercatinib’s potential as a treatment option in such refractory cases. The patients described in both cases were diagnosed with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC and developed intracranial metastases during pralsetinib treatment. After switching to selpercatinib, both exhibited significant intracranial responses. The first patient reported a reduction in brain metastasis size and maintained a response for over 1.5 years. The second patient also responded intracranially to selpercatinib but unfortunately passed away 8 months later owing to pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly linked to prior radiation treatment. These cases highlight the potential efficacy of selpercatinib in treating intracranial metastases in RET fusion-positive patients with NSCLC after pralsetinib-refractory progression. The key takeaway is that selpercatinib may offer a viable treatment option in such scenarios, although more extensive studies are needed to determine its role as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信