Bryden Leung, Julia Treleaven, Alana Dinsdale, Linda Marsh, Lucy Thomas
{"title":"与针对颈椎的保守物理治疗相关的严重不良事件:系统回顾","authors":"Bryden Leung, Julia Treleaven, Alana Dinsdale, Linda Marsh, Lucy Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous reviews on serious adverse events (SAEs) following physical interventions involving the neck have focused on vascular SAEs or those related to cervical manipulation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the evidence for all serious adverse events associated with any physical cervical procedures and describe SAE characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science and Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 2023 for studies reporting characteristics of SAE following any neck intervention and patient demographics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two hundred and thirty-three studies describing 334 SAE cases were identified. Forty-one were reported in the last 5 years. The results confirmed findings of past reviews with most events being vascular (58%) and mainly arterial dissection or vertebral artery related and the majority involving manipulation (75%). However lesser-known SAES ie neurological (25%), combined vascular/neurological (12%) and others (5%) which included cases such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks, phrenic nerve palsies and retinal detachments were identified. Further, some followed procedures such as vestibular testing, gentle mobilization, exercises, acupuncture or even massage. Initial symptoms included sharp increases in headache/neck pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and altered sensation, during treatment or within 48 h, often preceding neurological signs. Most recovered favourably (62%), 16% with disability, 6% died, the rest were unspecified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most SAEs were vascular and associated with manipulation but awareness of potential neurological and orthopaedic injuries and other procedures should be raised. Monitoring for early signs of SAEs for up to 48 h post-intervention is advisable if a SAE is suspected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 56-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serious adverse events associated with conservative physical procedures directed towards the cervical spine: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Bryden Leung, Julia Treleaven, Alana Dinsdale, Linda Marsh, Lucy Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Previous reviews on serious adverse events (SAEs) following physical interventions involving the neck have focused on vascular SAEs or those related to cervical manipulation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the evidence for all serious adverse events associated with any physical cervical procedures and describe SAE characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science and Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 2023 for studies reporting characteristics of SAE following any neck intervention and patient demographics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two hundred and thirty-three studies describing 334 SAE cases were identified. Forty-one were reported in the last 5 years. The results confirmed findings of past reviews with most events being vascular (58%) and mainly arterial dissection or vertebral artery related and the majority involving manipulation (75%). However lesser-known SAES ie neurological (25%), combined vascular/neurological (12%) and others (5%) which included cases such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks, phrenic nerve palsies and retinal detachments were identified. Further, some followed procedures such as vestibular testing, gentle mobilization, exercises, acupuncture or even massage. Initial symptoms included sharp increases in headache/neck pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and altered sensation, during treatment or within 48 h, often preceding neurological signs. Most recovered favourably (62%), 16% with disability, 6% died, the rest were unspecified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most SAEs were vascular and associated with manipulation but awareness of potential neurological and orthopaedic injuries and other procedures should be raised. Monitoring for early signs of SAEs for up to 48 h post-intervention is advisable if a SAE is suspected.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 56-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922400442X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922400442X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景以往有关颈部物理干预后严重不良事件(SAEs)的综述主要集中在血管性 SAEs 或与颈椎手法相关的 SAEs 上。目的综述与任何颈椎物理手术相关的所有严重不良事件的证据,并描述 SAE 的特征。方法在 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane、Web of Science 和 Index to Chiropractic Literature 中检索从开始到 2023 年 5 月报告任何颈部干预后 SAE 特征和患者人口统计学特征的研究。其中 41 项研究是在过去 5 年中报告的。结果证实了过去的回顾性研究结果,大多数事件都是血管性的(58%),主要与动脉夹层或椎动脉有关,大多数涉及手法操作(75%)。但也发现了一些鲜为人知的 SAES,如神经系统(25%)、血管/神经系统合并(12%)和其他(5%),包括脑脊液漏、膈神经麻痹和视网膜脱落等病例。此外,一些患者还接受了前庭测试、轻度活动、运动、针灸甚至按摩等治疗。最初的症状包括在治疗期间或 48 小时内头痛/颈痛、恶心、呕吐、头晕和感觉改变等症状急剧加重,这些症状往往出现在神经系统症状之前。大多数 SAE 都是血管性的,与手法治疗有关,但应提高对潜在的神经和骨科损伤及其他程序的认识。如果怀疑发生了 SAE,最好在干预后 48 小时内对 SAE 的早期迹象进行监测。
Serious adverse events associated with conservative physical procedures directed towards the cervical spine: A systematic review
Background
Previous reviews on serious adverse events (SAEs) following physical interventions involving the neck have focused on vascular SAEs or those related to cervical manipulation.
Objective
To review the evidence for all serious adverse events associated with any physical cervical procedures and describe SAE characteristics.
Methods
Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science and Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 2023 for studies reporting characteristics of SAE following any neck intervention and patient demographics.
Results
Two hundred and thirty-three studies describing 334 SAE cases were identified. Forty-one were reported in the last 5 years. The results confirmed findings of past reviews with most events being vascular (58%) and mainly arterial dissection or vertebral artery related and the majority involving manipulation (75%). However lesser-known SAES ie neurological (25%), combined vascular/neurological (12%) and others (5%) which included cases such as cerebrospinal fluid leaks, phrenic nerve palsies and retinal detachments were identified. Further, some followed procedures such as vestibular testing, gentle mobilization, exercises, acupuncture or even massage. Initial symptoms included sharp increases in headache/neck pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness and altered sensation, during treatment or within 48 h, often preceding neurological signs. Most recovered favourably (62%), 16% with disability, 6% died, the rest were unspecified.
Conclusion
Most SAEs were vascular and associated with manipulation but awareness of potential neurological and orthopaedic injuries and other procedures should be raised. Monitoring for early signs of SAEs for up to 48 h post-intervention is advisable if a SAE is suspected.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina