探索卫生专业人员培训中的反馈素养:一项定性研究

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Javiera Fuentes-Cimma MSc , Francisca Rammsy , Alanis Molina-Obreque , Valentina Murga-Alfaro , Catalina Neira-Silva , Daniela Olivares-Maturana , Ignacio Villagrán MSc
{"title":"探索卫生专业人员培训中的反馈素养:一项定性研究","authors":"Javiera Fuentes-Cimma MSc ,&nbsp;Francisca Rammsy ,&nbsp;Alanis Molina-Obreque ,&nbsp;Valentina Murga-Alfaro ,&nbsp;Catalina Neira-Silva ,&nbsp;Daniela Olivares-Maturana ,&nbsp;Ignacio Villagrán MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.rmclc.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Feedback is recognized as a process in which students make sense of information from various sources and use it to improve performance. Several studies have shown dissatisfaction from students about this process, which could mean there is no conceptual consensus about this process.</div><div>Feedback literacy refers to the understanding and capacities to make sense of the information received and use it to improve performance, which is considered essential for an effective feedback process. Despite its importance, the implications that student feedback literacy has in teaching and course design have not been sufficiently taken into account, and uncertainty persists about engaging them effectively, especially in clinical settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Cross-sectional study with a pragmatic approach and qualitative methods. First and fourth-year students from health-related careers at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile were invited to participate. Six focus groups were organized, and thematic analysis was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three themes guided the findings. Differences exist between first- and fourth-year students regarding their capacity to recognize feedback instances and how they make sense of their experiences with this educational strategy. Students perceive feedback as a one-way process. Higher-level students recognize more instances of feedback.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Understanding students’ feedback literacy will enable future educational interventions on feedback processes in Health Sciences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31544,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","volume":"35 5","pages":"Pages 484-490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explorando la alfabetización en feedback en la formación de profesionales de la salud: un estudio cualitativo\",\"authors\":\"Javiera Fuentes-Cimma MSc ,&nbsp;Francisca Rammsy ,&nbsp;Alanis Molina-Obreque ,&nbsp;Valentina Murga-Alfaro ,&nbsp;Catalina Neira-Silva ,&nbsp;Daniela Olivares-Maturana ,&nbsp;Ignacio Villagrán MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmclc.2024.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Feedback is recognized as a process in which students make sense of information from various sources and use it to improve performance. Several studies have shown dissatisfaction from students about this process, which could mean there is no conceptual consensus about this process.</div><div>Feedback literacy refers to the understanding and capacities to make sense of the information received and use it to improve performance, which is considered essential for an effective feedback process. Despite its importance, the implications that student feedback literacy has in teaching and course design have not been sufficiently taken into account, and uncertainty persists about engaging them effectively, especially in clinical settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Cross-sectional study with a pragmatic approach and qualitative methods. First and fourth-year students from health-related careers at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile were invited to participate. Six focus groups were organized, and thematic analysis was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three themes guided the findings. Differences exist between first- and fourth-year students regarding their capacity to recognize feedback instances and how they make sense of their experiences with this educational strategy. Students perceive feedback as a one-way process. Higher-level students recognize more instances of feedback.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Understanding students’ feedback literacy will enable future educational interventions on feedback processes in Health Sciences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 484-490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864024000798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0716864024000798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言反馈被认为是学生理解各种来源的信息并将其用于提高成绩的一个过程。一些研究表明,学生对这一过程并不满意,这可能意味着在这一过程的概念上还没有达成共识。反馈素养指的是对所收到的信息进行理解并将其用于提高成绩的理解和能力,这被认为是有效的反馈过程所必不可少的。尽管反馈素养很重要,但学生反馈素养对教学和课程设计的影响尚未得到充分考虑,如何有效地让学生参与其中,尤其是在临床环境中,仍存在不确定性。邀请智利天主教主教大学健康相关专业的一年级和四年级学生参加。研究组织了六个焦点小组,并采用了主题分析法。一年级学生和四年级学生在识别反馈实例的能力以及如何理解这一教育策略的经验方面存在差异。学生认为反馈是一个单向的过程。结论 了解学生的反馈素养将有助于未来在健康科学中对反馈过程进行教育干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explorando la alfabetización en feedback en la formación de profesionales de la salud: un estudio cualitativo

Introduction

Feedback is recognized as a process in which students make sense of information from various sources and use it to improve performance. Several studies have shown dissatisfaction from students about this process, which could mean there is no conceptual consensus about this process.
Feedback literacy refers to the understanding and capacities to make sense of the information received and use it to improve performance, which is considered essential for an effective feedback process. Despite its importance, the implications that student feedback literacy has in teaching and course design have not been sufficiently taken into account, and uncertainty persists about engaging them effectively, especially in clinical settings.

Methodology

Cross-sectional study with a pragmatic approach and qualitative methods. First and fourth-year students from health-related careers at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile were invited to participate. Six focus groups were organized, and thematic analysis was used.

Results

Three themes guided the findings. Differences exist between first- and fourth-year students regarding their capacity to recognize feedback instances and how they make sense of their experiences with this educational strategy. Students perceive feedback as a one-way process. Higher-level students recognize more instances of feedback.

Conclusions

Understanding students’ feedback literacy will enable future educational interventions on feedback processes in Health Sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes
Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信