Pok-Tin Tang, Benjamin Bussmann, Asad Shabbir, Andrew Elkington, William Orr
{"title":"在门诊快速通道心脏病诊所评估疑似心脏病变的安全结果。","authors":"Pok-Tin Tang, Benjamin Bussmann, Asad Shabbir, Andrew Elkington, William Orr","doi":"10.5837/bjc.2024.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac pathology contributes to a significant proportion of emergency department (ED) attendances. Many could be managed as urgent outpatients and avoid hospital admission. We evaluated a novel rapidaccess general cardiology clinic to achieve this, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of baseline characteristics, investigations, final diagnoses, and 90-day safety (readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], mortality) from electronic records and conducted a patient experience survey. There were 216 ED referrals made between 1 June and 30 October 2020. The median time to review was two days (interquartile range 1-5). At 90 days, there were three (1.4%) representations requiring admission, two (0.9%) MACE, and no deaths. There were 205 (95%) successfully managed without hospital admission. Among surveyed patients, 96% felt they had concerns adequately addressed in a timely manner. In conclusion, our rapid-access cardiology clinic is a safe model for outpatient management of a range of cardiovascular presentations to the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":74959,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of cardiology","volume":"31 2","pages":"017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety outcomes of suspected cardiac pathology assessed in an ambulatory rapid-access cardiology clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Pok-Tin Tang, Benjamin Bussmann, Asad Shabbir, Andrew Elkington, William Orr\",\"doi\":\"10.5837/bjc.2024.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiac pathology contributes to a significant proportion of emergency department (ED) attendances. Many could be managed as urgent outpatients and avoid hospital admission. We evaluated a novel rapidaccess general cardiology clinic to achieve this, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of baseline characteristics, investigations, final diagnoses, and 90-day safety (readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], mortality) from electronic records and conducted a patient experience survey. There were 216 ED referrals made between 1 June and 30 October 2020. The median time to review was two days (interquartile range 1-5). At 90 days, there were three (1.4%) representations requiring admission, two (0.9%) MACE, and no deaths. There were 205 (95%) successfully managed without hospital admission. Among surveyed patients, 96% felt they had concerns adequately addressed in a timely manner. In conclusion, our rapid-access cardiology clinic is a safe model for outpatient management of a range of cardiovascular presentations to the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5837/bjc.2024.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5837/bjc.2024.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety outcomes of suspected cardiac pathology assessed in an ambulatory rapid-access cardiology clinic.
Cardiac pathology contributes to a significant proportion of emergency department (ED) attendances. Many could be managed as urgent outpatients and avoid hospital admission. We evaluated a novel rapidaccess general cardiology clinic to achieve this, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of baseline characteristics, investigations, final diagnoses, and 90-day safety (readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], mortality) from electronic records and conducted a patient experience survey. There were 216 ED referrals made between 1 June and 30 October 2020. The median time to review was two days (interquartile range 1-5). At 90 days, there were three (1.4%) representations requiring admission, two (0.9%) MACE, and no deaths. There were 205 (95%) successfully managed without hospital admission. Among surveyed patients, 96% felt they had concerns adequately addressed in a timely manner. In conclusion, our rapid-access cardiology clinic is a safe model for outpatient management of a range of cardiovascular presentations to the ED.