影响中国肺癌发病率的因素:Meta分析

IF 0.9 Q4 NURSING
Kaihan Yang, Hongwei Jiang, Lu Deng, Yang Chi, Xueyi Xiao, Shuai Zhang
{"title":"影响中国肺癌发病率的因素:Meta分析","authors":"Kaihan Yang, Hongwei Jiang, Lu Deng, Yang Chi, Xueyi Xiao, Shuai Zhang","doi":"10.5152/FNJN.2024.23050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the main factors associated with lung cancer incidence in China and provide reference for developing successful lung cancer interventions and accelerating progress against cancer. All publications related to the influencing factors of lung cancer incidence were retrieved from four databases from their date of inception through September 2022. Eight Medical Subject Headings and corresponding keywords were utilized to identify eligible trials in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine Database (CBM). The heterogeneity test and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4) software. This study was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Fourteen studies, published from 2000 to 2019, have been chosen and incorporated in a meta-analysis. The mean total quality score across the included studies was 7, with a range of 6-8. The findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking (odds ratio=2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-3.11), passive smoking (odds ratio=2.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.13-2.80), lung/respiratory disease (odds ratio=2.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-3.89), family history of tumor (odds ratio=2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.80-4.32), oil fume (odds ratio=1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-2.43), and psychological factor (odds ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-2.73) were risk factors for lung cancer, while more fruits and vegetables (odds ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.75), exercise (odds ratio=0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.72), and tea drinking (odds ratio=0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.83) were protective factors for lung cancer. Funnel plot analysis demonstrated the absence of any apparent publication bias. The risk and protective factors influencing the lung cancer incidence are diverse. Considering the research limitations, we should have more research projects to explore the factors that affect lung cancer incidence and explain the research results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73033,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","volume":"32 2","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing the Lung Cancer Incidence in China: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kaihan Yang, Hongwei Jiang, Lu Deng, Yang Chi, Xueyi Xiao, Shuai Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/FNJN.2024.23050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the main factors associated with lung cancer incidence in China and provide reference for developing successful lung cancer interventions and accelerating progress against cancer. All publications related to the influencing factors of lung cancer incidence were retrieved from four databases from their date of inception through September 2022. Eight Medical Subject Headings and corresponding keywords were utilized to identify eligible trials in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine Database (CBM). The heterogeneity test and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4) software. This study was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Fourteen studies, published from 2000 to 2019, have been chosen and incorporated in a meta-analysis. The mean total quality score across the included studies was 7, with a range of 6-8. The findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking (odds ratio=2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-3.11), passive smoking (odds ratio=2.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.13-2.80), lung/respiratory disease (odds ratio=2.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-3.89), family history of tumor (odds ratio=2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.80-4.32), oil fume (odds ratio=1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-2.43), and psychological factor (odds ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-2.73) were risk factors for lung cancer, while more fruits and vegetables (odds ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.75), exercise (odds ratio=0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.72), and tea drinking (odds ratio=0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.83) were protective factors for lung cancer. Funnel plot analysis demonstrated the absence of any apparent publication bias. The risk and protective factors influencing the lung cancer incidence are diverse. Considering the research limitations, we should have more research projects to explore the factors that affect lung cancer incidence and explain the research results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"198-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332445/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2024.23050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2024.23050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在系统评估中国肺癌发病的主要相关因素,为制定成功的肺癌干预措施和加快抗癌进程提供参考。本研究从四个数据库中检索了与肺癌发病率影响因素相关的所有文献,检索时间自文献开始发表之日起至2022年9月。利用八个医学主题词和相应的关键词在中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)和中国生物医学数据库(CBM)中找出符合条件的试验。使用Review Manager(RevMan,5.4版)软件进行异质性检验和荟萃分析。本研究根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols)进行设计。本研究选择了 2000 年至 2019 年间发表的 14 项研究,并将其纳入荟萃分析。纳入研究的平均总质量分为 7 分,范围为 6-8 分。荟萃分析结果表明,吸烟(几率比=2.46,95% 置信区间:1.94-3.11)、被动吸烟(几率比=2.44,95% 置信区间:2.13-2.80)、肺部/呼吸系统疾病(几率比=2.66,95% 置信区间:1.82-3.89)、肿瘤家族史(几率比=2.79,95% 置信区间:1.80-4.32)、油烟(几率比=1.91,95% 置信区间:1.多吃水果和蔬菜(几率比=0.51,95% 置信区间:0.35-0.75)、运动(几率比=0.55,95% 置信区间:0.43-0.72)和饮茶(几率比=0.52,95% 置信区间:0.32-0.83)是肺癌的保护因素。漏斗图分析表明没有明显的发表偏倚。影响肺癌发病率的风险和保护因素多种多样。考虑到研究的局限性,我们应该有更多的研究项目来探索影响肺癌发病率的因素并解释研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing the Lung Cancer Incidence in China: A Meta-Analysis.

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the main factors associated with lung cancer incidence in China and provide reference for developing successful lung cancer interventions and accelerating progress against cancer. All publications related to the influencing factors of lung cancer incidence were retrieved from four databases from their date of inception through September 2022. Eight Medical Subject Headings and corresponding keywords were utilized to identify eligible trials in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine Database (CBM). The heterogeneity test and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4) software. This study was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Fourteen studies, published from 2000 to 2019, have been chosen and incorporated in a meta-analysis. The mean total quality score across the included studies was 7, with a range of 6-8. The findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking (odds ratio=2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-3.11), passive smoking (odds ratio=2.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.13-2.80), lung/respiratory disease (odds ratio=2.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-3.89), family history of tumor (odds ratio=2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.80-4.32), oil fume (odds ratio=1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-2.43), and psychological factor (odds ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-2.73) were risk factors for lung cancer, while more fruits and vegetables (odds ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.75), exercise (odds ratio=0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.72), and tea drinking (odds ratio=0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.83) were protective factors for lung cancer. Funnel plot analysis demonstrated the absence of any apparent publication bias. The risk and protective factors influencing the lung cancer incidence are diverse. Considering the research limitations, we should have more research projects to explore the factors that affect lung cancer incidence and explain the research results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信