Ekaterina V Biyutskaya, Elyar E Gasanov, Kseniia V Khazova, Nikita A Patrashkin
{"title":"对困难生活任务的感知进行分类:机器学习和/或逻辑过程建模。","authors":"Ekaterina V Biyutskaya, Elyar E Gasanov, Kseniia V Khazova, Nikita A Patrashkin","doi":"10.11621/pir.2024.0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although quite a few classifications of coping strategies have been proposed, with different premises, much less is known about the methods of interpretation and how people using different types of coping perceive their life difficulties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a verifiable algorithm for classifying perceived difficulties. The proposed classification was developed deductively, using \"approach-avoidance\" as the basis for cognitive activity aimed at taking on (approaching) a difficult situation or escaping from it, avoiding a solution to the problem. The classification comprises 1) driven, 2) maximal, 3) optimal, 4) ambivalent, and 5) evasive types of perception of difficult life tasks (DLTs). Types 1, 2, and 3 correspond to approaching a difficult situation, and 5 to avoiding it. Type 4 involves a combination of approach and avoidance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The type is determined by an expert psychologist in a complex way, based on a combination of 1) the respondent's profile according to the \"Types of Orientations in Difficult Situations\" questionnaire (TODS) and 2) features that are significant for the type as shown in qualitative data - descriptions of DLTs (answers to open questions). Machine learning methods and A.S. Podkolzin's computer modeling of logical processes are used to develop the algorithm. The sample comprised 611 adult participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 25; SD = 5.8; 427 women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using machine-learning algorithms, various options were tested for separation into classes; the best results were obtained with a combination of markup and questionnaire features and sequential separation of classes. Using computer modeling of logical processes, classification rules were tested, based on the psychologist's description of the features of the type of perception. The classification accuracy using these rules of the final algorithm is 77.17% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An algorithm was obtained that allows step-by-step tracing of the process by which a classification problem is solved by the psychologist. We propose a new model for studying situational perception using a mixed research design and computer-modeling methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"17 2","pages":"64-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying the Perception of Difficult Life Tasks: Machine Learning and/or Modeling of Logical Processes.\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina V Biyutskaya, Elyar E Gasanov, Kseniia V Khazova, Nikita A Patrashkin\",\"doi\":\"10.11621/pir.2024.0205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although quite a few classifications of coping strategies have been proposed, with different premises, much less is known about the methods of interpretation and how people using different types of coping perceive their life difficulties.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a verifiable algorithm for classifying perceived difficulties. The proposed classification was developed deductively, using \\\"approach-avoidance\\\" as the basis for cognitive activity aimed at taking on (approaching) a difficult situation or escaping from it, avoiding a solution to the problem. The classification comprises 1) driven, 2) maximal, 3) optimal, 4) ambivalent, and 5) evasive types of perception of difficult life tasks (DLTs). Types 1, 2, and 3 correspond to approaching a difficult situation, and 5 to avoiding it. Type 4 involves a combination of approach and avoidance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The type is determined by an expert psychologist in a complex way, based on a combination of 1) the respondent's profile according to the \\\"Types of Orientations in Difficult Situations\\\" questionnaire (TODS) and 2) features that are significant for the type as shown in qualitative data - descriptions of DLTs (answers to open questions). Machine learning methods and A.S. Podkolzin's computer modeling of logical processes are used to develop the algorithm. The sample comprised 611 adult participants (M<sub>age</sub> = 25; SD = 5.8; 427 women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using machine-learning algorithms, various options were tested for separation into classes; the best results were obtained with a combination of markup and questionnaire features and sequential separation of classes. Using computer modeling of logical processes, classification rules were tested, based on the psychologist's description of the features of the type of perception. The classification accuracy using these rules of the final algorithm is 77.17% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An algorithm was obtained that allows step-by-step tracing of the process by which a classification problem is solved by the psychologist. We propose a new model for studying situational perception using a mixed research design and computer-modeling methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"64-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2024.0205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2024.0205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classifying the Perception of Difficult Life Tasks: Machine Learning and/or Modeling of Logical Processes.
Background: Although quite a few classifications of coping strategies have been proposed, with different premises, much less is known about the methods of interpretation and how people using different types of coping perceive their life difficulties.
Objective: To develop a verifiable algorithm for classifying perceived difficulties. The proposed classification was developed deductively, using "approach-avoidance" as the basis for cognitive activity aimed at taking on (approaching) a difficult situation or escaping from it, avoiding a solution to the problem. The classification comprises 1) driven, 2) maximal, 3) optimal, 4) ambivalent, and 5) evasive types of perception of difficult life tasks (DLTs). Types 1, 2, and 3 correspond to approaching a difficult situation, and 5 to avoiding it. Type 4 involves a combination of approach and avoidance.
Design: The type is determined by an expert psychologist in a complex way, based on a combination of 1) the respondent's profile according to the "Types of Orientations in Difficult Situations" questionnaire (TODS) and 2) features that are significant for the type as shown in qualitative data - descriptions of DLTs (answers to open questions). Machine learning methods and A.S. Podkolzin's computer modeling of logical processes are used to develop the algorithm. The sample comprised 611 adult participants (Mage = 25; SD = 5.8; 427 women).
Results: Using machine-learning algorithms, various options were tested for separation into classes; the best results were obtained with a combination of markup and questionnaire features and sequential separation of classes. Using computer modeling of logical processes, classification rules were tested, based on the psychologist's description of the features of the type of perception. The classification accuracy using these rules of the final algorithm is 77.17% of cases.
Conclusion: An algorithm was obtained that allows step-by-step tracing of the process by which a classification problem is solved by the psychologist. We propose a new model for studying situational perception using a mixed research design and computer-modeling methods.
期刊介绍:
Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.