将姑息康复纳入癌症护理:一项多国混合方法研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Guro Birgitte Stene, May Aasebø Hauken, Hilde Hjelmeland Ahmedzai, Constance Gaard Storvestre, Skjalg Eirik Vervik, Joanne Bayly, Augusto Tommaso Caraceni, Stefania Costi, Guillaume Economos, Mai-Britt Guldin, Barry J A Laird, Lise Nottelmann, Matthew Maddocks, Andrew Toby Prevost, Julia Romeyer, Line Merethe Oldervoll
{"title":"将姑息康复纳入癌症护理:一项多国混合方法研究。","authors":"Guro Birgitte Stene, May Aasebø Hauken, Hilde Hjelmeland Ahmedzai, Constance Gaard Storvestre, Skjalg Eirik Vervik, Joanne Bayly, Augusto Tommaso Caraceni, Stefania Costi, Guillaume Economos, Mai-Britt Guldin, Barry J A Laird, Lise Nottelmann, Matthew Maddocks, Andrew Toby Prevost, Julia Romeyer, Line Merethe Oldervoll","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01586-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incurable cancer is a major contributor to societal suffering and disability, and palliative rehabilitation is recommended to be integrated within and between cancer services at all healthcare levels. However, little knowledge exists on how integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer is understood and achieved in clinical practice. INSPIRE (Integrated short-term palliative rehabilitation to improve quality of life and equitable care access in incurable cancer) is a large European-funded project that aims to promote quality of life through a novel rehabilitation model for people disabled by advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the existing integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer within official documents and in clinical practice across five European countries including United Kingdom, France, Denmark, Norway, and Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods study with a concurrent research design, comprising a document analysis (N = 23), stakeholder interviews (N = 22), and an online survey (N = 225). Data from each sub-study were analysed separately before results were merged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was limited integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer in official documents and in clinical practice, though some indicators of integration, including participation in multidisciplinary teams and adherence to standardised pathways, were identified in the survey. Notably, integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer in clinical practice was observed within limited organisations in secondary healthcare systems, without widespread adoption. Although palliative rehabilitation in cancer as a concept was sparingly used by stakeholders, they recognised the need for a comprehensive approach including multidisciplinary teams that aligns with the individual patient's needs and goals. Moreover, the ambiguous distinction between the terms 'palliative rehabilitation' and 'palliative care', insufficient funding, lack of well-defined care pathways and competence gaps among healthcare professionals represented barriers to integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer was limited in the five EU partnership countries investigated. Clarifying the concept of palliative rehabilitation, including adoption of the concept into official documents and delineating it from palliative care, is essential for more successful integration. This can possibly be achieved by addressing the barriers identified and fostering close collaboration across disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer care: a multinational mixed method study.\",\"authors\":\"Guro Birgitte Stene, May Aasebø Hauken, Hilde Hjelmeland Ahmedzai, Constance Gaard Storvestre, Skjalg Eirik Vervik, Joanne Bayly, Augusto Tommaso Caraceni, Stefania Costi, Guillaume Economos, Mai-Britt Guldin, Barry J A Laird, Lise Nottelmann, Matthew Maddocks, Andrew Toby Prevost, Julia Romeyer, Line Merethe Oldervoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01586-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incurable cancer is a major contributor to societal suffering and disability, and palliative rehabilitation is recommended to be integrated within and between cancer services at all healthcare levels. However, little knowledge exists on how integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer is understood and achieved in clinical practice. INSPIRE (Integrated short-term palliative rehabilitation to improve quality of life and equitable care access in incurable cancer) is a large European-funded project that aims to promote quality of life through a novel rehabilitation model for people disabled by advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the existing integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer within official documents and in clinical practice across five European countries including United Kingdom, France, Denmark, Norway, and Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods study with a concurrent research design, comprising a document analysis (N = 23), stakeholder interviews (N = 22), and an online survey (N = 225). Data from each sub-study were analysed separately before results were merged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was limited integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer in official documents and in clinical practice, though some indicators of integration, including participation in multidisciplinary teams and adherence to standardised pathways, were identified in the survey. Notably, integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer in clinical practice was observed within limited organisations in secondary healthcare systems, without widespread adoption. Although palliative rehabilitation in cancer as a concept was sparingly used by stakeholders, they recognised the need for a comprehensive approach including multidisciplinary teams that aligns with the individual patient's needs and goals. Moreover, the ambiguous distinction between the terms 'palliative rehabilitation' and 'palliative care', insufficient funding, lack of well-defined care pathways and competence gaps among healthcare professionals represented barriers to integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer was limited in the five EU partnership countries investigated. Clarifying the concept of palliative rehabilitation, including adoption of the concept into official documents and delineating it from palliative care, is essential for more successful integration. This can possibly be achieved by addressing the barriers identified and fostering close collaboration across disciplines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01586-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01586-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无法治愈的癌症是造成社会痛苦和残疾的主要因素,建议将姑息康复纳入各级医疗保健机构的癌症服务内部和之间。然而,在临床实践中,人们对如何理解和实现癌症姑息康复的整合却知之甚少。INSPIRE(整合短期姑息康复治疗以提高晚期癌症患者的生活质量和获得公平护理的机会)是一个由欧洲资助的大型项目,旨在通过一种新型康复模式提高晚期癌症患者的生活质量。目的:比较英国、法国、丹麦、挪威和意大利等五个欧洲国家在官方文件和临床实践中对癌症姑息康复治疗的整合情况:混合方法研究,采用并行研究设计,包括文件分析(23 份)、利益相关者访谈(22 份)和在线调查(225 份)。在合并结果之前,分别对每个子研究的数据进行分析:官方文件和临床实践对癌症姑息康复的整合有限,但调查中发现了一些整合指标,包括参与多学科团队和遵守标准化路径。值得注意的是,癌症姑息康复在临床实践中的整合是在二级医疗系统的有限组织内进行的,并未得到广泛采用。虽然癌症姑息康复作为一个概念很少被利益相关者使用,但他们认识到需要一种包括多学科团队在内的综合方法,以符合患者的个体需求和目标。此外,"姑息康复 "与 "姑息治疗 "之间的区别不明确、资金不足、缺乏明确的治疗路径以及医护人员的能力差距都是将癌症姑息康复纳入临床实践的障碍:结论:在所调查的五个欧盟合作国家中,癌症姑息康复的整合程度有限。明确姑息康复的概念,包括在官方文件中采用这一概念并将其与姑息治疗区分开来,对于更成功地整合姑息康复至关重要。要做到这一点,就必须消除已发现的障碍,促进各学科间的密切合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer care: a multinational mixed method study.

Background: Incurable cancer is a major contributor to societal suffering and disability, and palliative rehabilitation is recommended to be integrated within and between cancer services at all healthcare levels. However, little knowledge exists on how integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer is understood and achieved in clinical practice. INSPIRE (Integrated short-term palliative rehabilitation to improve quality of life and equitable care access in incurable cancer) is a large European-funded project that aims to promote quality of life through a novel rehabilitation model for people disabled by advanced cancer.

Aim: To compare the existing integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer within official documents and in clinical practice across five European countries including United Kingdom, France, Denmark, Norway, and Italy.

Methods: Mixed methods study with a concurrent research design, comprising a document analysis (N = 23), stakeholder interviews (N = 22), and an online survey (N = 225). Data from each sub-study were analysed separately before results were merged.

Results: There was limited integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer in official documents and in clinical practice, though some indicators of integration, including participation in multidisciplinary teams and adherence to standardised pathways, were identified in the survey. Notably, integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer in clinical practice was observed within limited organisations in secondary healthcare systems, without widespread adoption. Although palliative rehabilitation in cancer as a concept was sparingly used by stakeholders, they recognised the need for a comprehensive approach including multidisciplinary teams that aligns with the individual patient's needs and goals. Moreover, the ambiguous distinction between the terms 'palliative rehabilitation' and 'palliative care', insufficient funding, lack of well-defined care pathways and competence gaps among healthcare professionals represented barriers to integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer into clinical practice.

Conclusion: Integration of palliative rehabilitation in cancer was limited in the five EU partnership countries investigated. Clarifying the concept of palliative rehabilitation, including adoption of the concept into official documents and delineating it from palliative care, is essential for more successful integration. This can possibly be achieved by addressing the barriers identified and fostering close collaboration across disciplines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信