人工智能能否帮助泌尿科医生检测膀胱癌?

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Antoninus Hengky, Stevan Kristian Lionardi, Christopher Kusumajaya
{"title":"人工智能能否帮助泌尿科医生检测膀胱癌?","authors":"Antoninus Hengky, Stevan Kristian Lionardi, Christopher Kusumajaya","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_39_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based support system endoscopy, including cystoscopy, has shown promising results by training deep learning algorithms with large datasets of images and videos. This AI-aided cystoscopy has the potential to significantly transform the urological practice by assisting the urologists in identifying malignant areas, especially considering the diverse appearance of these lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases, the PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, and ScienceDirect were searched, along with a manual hand search. Prospective and retrospective studies, experimental studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies assessing the utilization of AI for the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy and comparing with the histopathology results as the reference standard were included. The following terms and their variants were used: \"artificial intelligence,\" \"cystoscopy,\" and \"bladder cancer.\" The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The Moses-Littenberg model was used to derive the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics (SROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were selected for the analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.908-0.976) and 0.957 (95% CI: 0.923-0.977), respectively. Pooled diagnostic odd ratio was 449.79 (95% CI: 12.42-887.17). SROC curve (area under the curve: 0.988, 95% CI: 0.982-0.994) indicated a strong discriminating power of AI-aided cystoscopy in differentiation normal or benign bladder lesions from the malignant ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the utilization of AI for aiding in the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy remains questionable, it has shown encouraging potential for enhancing the detection rates. Future studies should concentrate on identification of the patients groups which could derive maximum benefit from accurate identification of the bladder cancer, such as those with intermediate or high-risk invasive tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":"40 4","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can artificial intelligence aid the urologists in detecting bladder cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Antoninus Hengky, Stevan Kristian Lionardi, Christopher Kusumajaya\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_39_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based support system endoscopy, including cystoscopy, has shown promising results by training deep learning algorithms with large datasets of images and videos. This AI-aided cystoscopy has the potential to significantly transform the urological practice by assisting the urologists in identifying malignant areas, especially considering the diverse appearance of these lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases, the PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, and ScienceDirect were searched, along with a manual hand search. Prospective and retrospective studies, experimental studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies assessing the utilization of AI for the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy and comparing with the histopathology results as the reference standard were included. The following terms and their variants were used: \\\"artificial intelligence,\\\" \\\"cystoscopy,\\\" and \\\"bladder cancer.\\\" The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The Moses-Littenberg model was used to derive the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics (SROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were selected for the analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.908-0.976) and 0.957 (95% CI: 0.923-0.977), respectively. Pooled diagnostic odd ratio was 449.79 (95% CI: 12.42-887.17). SROC curve (area under the curve: 0.988, 95% CI: 0.982-0.994) indicated a strong discriminating power of AI-aided cystoscopy in differentiation normal or benign bladder lesions from the malignant ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the utilization of AI for aiding in the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy remains questionable, it has shown encouraging potential for enhancing the detection rates. Future studies should concentrate on identification of the patients groups which could derive maximum benefit from accurate identification of the bladder cancer, such as those with intermediate or high-risk invasive tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"221-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_39_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_39_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:基于人工智能(AI)的支持系统内窥镜检查(包括膀胱镜检查)的出现,通过使用大量图像和视频数据集训练深度学习算法,已显示出良好的效果。这种人工智能辅助膀胱镜检查有可能帮助泌尿科医生识别恶性病变区域,尤其是考虑到这些病变的外观多种多样,从而大大改变泌尿科的诊疗方法:搜索了 PubMed、ProQuest、EBSCOHost 和 ScienceDirect 四个数据库,并进行了人工搜索。包括前瞻性和回顾性研究、实验研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究,这些研究评估了人工智能在通过膀胱镜检查发现膀胱癌方面的应用情况,并与作为参考标准的组织病理学结果进行了比较。使用了以下术语及其变体:"人工智能"、"膀胱镜检查 "和 "膀胱癌"。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。采用随机效应模型计算汇总灵敏度和特异性。摩西-利滕伯格(Moses-Littenberg)模型用于计算接收者操作特征(SROC)曲线:结果:共选取了五项研究进行分析。汇总灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.953(95% 置信区间[CI]:0.908-0.976)和 0.957(95% CI:0.923-0.977)。汇总诊断奇异比为 449.79(95% CI:12.42-887.17)。SROC曲线(曲线下面积:0.988,95% CI:0.982-0.994)显示,人工智能辅助膀胱镜检查在区分正常或良性膀胱病变与恶性病变方面具有很强的鉴别力:尽管人工智能在通过膀胱镜检查辅助检测膀胱癌方面的应用仍值得商榷,但它在提高检测率方面已显示出令人鼓舞的潜力。未来的研究应集中于确定哪些患者群体可从准确识别膀胱癌中获得最大益处,如中度或高度危险的浸润性肿瘤患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can artificial intelligence aid the urologists in detecting bladder cancer?

Introduction: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based support system endoscopy, including cystoscopy, has shown promising results by training deep learning algorithms with large datasets of images and videos. This AI-aided cystoscopy has the potential to significantly transform the urological practice by assisting the urologists in identifying malignant areas, especially considering the diverse appearance of these lesions.

Methods: Four databases, the PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, and ScienceDirect were searched, along with a manual hand search. Prospective and retrospective studies, experimental studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies assessing the utilization of AI for the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy and comparing with the histopathology results as the reference standard were included. The following terms and their variants were used: "artificial intelligence," "cystoscopy," and "bladder cancer." The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The Moses-Littenberg model was used to derive the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics (SROC) curve.

Results: Five studies were selected for the analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.908-0.976) and 0.957 (95% CI: 0.923-0.977), respectively. Pooled diagnostic odd ratio was 449.79 (95% CI: 12.42-887.17). SROC curve (area under the curve: 0.988, 95% CI: 0.982-0.994) indicated a strong discriminating power of AI-aided cystoscopy in differentiation normal or benign bladder lesions from the malignant ones.

Conclusions: Although the utilization of AI for aiding in the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy remains questionable, it has shown encouraging potential for enhancing the detection rates. Future studies should concentrate on identification of the patients groups which could derive maximum benefit from accurate identification of the bladder cancer, such as those with intermediate or high-risk invasive tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信