风湿病学中的人工智能:现状与未来--德国风湿病学家全国调查的结果。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1759720X241275818
Marie-Therese Holzer, Anna Meinecke, Felix Müller, Isabell Haase, Harriet Morf, Thorben Witte, Hannah Labinsky, Philipp Klemm, Johannes Knitza, Martin Krusche
{"title":"风湿病学中的人工智能:现状与未来--德国风湿病学家全国调查的结果。","authors":"Marie-Therese Holzer, Anna Meinecke, Felix Müller, Isabell Haase, Harriet Morf, Thorben Witte, Hannah Labinsky, Philipp Klemm, Johannes Knitza, Martin Krusche","doi":"10.1177/1759720X241275818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development and potential of artificial intelligence (AI) is remarkable. Its application in all medical disciplines, including rheumatology, is attracting attention. To what extent AI is already used in clinical routine in rheumatology is unknown. In addition, the perceived barriers, potentials, and expectations regarding AI by rheumatologists have not yet been studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the current usage and perceived barriers and facilitators of AI, including large language models (LLMs), among rheumatologists.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National, observational, non-interventional, and cross-sectional web-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was developed by the Working Group Young Rheumatology (AGJR) of the German Society for Rheumatology. The survey was distributed at the Congress of the German Society for Rheumatology and via social media, QR code, and email from August 30 until November 4, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 172 rheumatologists (55% female; mean age 43 years) were analyzed. The majority stated that they did not previously use AI (73%) in their daily practice. Eighty-eight percent of rheumatologists rated their AI knowledge as low to intermediate and 84% would welcome dedicated training on LLMs. The majority of rheumatologists anticipated AI implementation to improve patient care (60%) and reduce daily workload (62%). Especially for diagnosis (73%), writing medical reports (70%), and data analysis (70%), rheumatologists reported a potential positive benefit of AI. Main AI concerns addressed the responsibility for medical decisions (64%) and data security (58%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the results indicate that rheumatologists currently have little AI knowledge and make very little use of AI in clinical routine. However, the majority of rheumatologists anticipate positive AI effects and would welcome increased AI implementation and dedicated training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"1759720X241275818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: status quo and quo vadis-results of a national survey among German rheumatologists.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Therese Holzer, Anna Meinecke, Felix Müller, Isabell Haase, Harriet Morf, Thorben Witte, Hannah Labinsky, Philipp Klemm, Johannes Knitza, Martin Krusche\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1759720X241275818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development and potential of artificial intelligence (AI) is remarkable. Its application in all medical disciplines, including rheumatology, is attracting attention. To what extent AI is already used in clinical routine in rheumatology is unknown. In addition, the perceived barriers, potentials, and expectations regarding AI by rheumatologists have not yet been studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the current usage and perceived barriers and facilitators of AI, including large language models (LLMs), among rheumatologists.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National, observational, non-interventional, and cross-sectional web-based study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was developed by the Working Group Young Rheumatology (AGJR) of the German Society for Rheumatology. The survey was distributed at the Congress of the German Society for Rheumatology and via social media, QR code, and email from August 30 until November 4, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 172 rheumatologists (55% female; mean age 43 years) were analyzed. The majority stated that they did not previously use AI (73%) in their daily practice. Eighty-eight percent of rheumatologists rated their AI knowledge as low to intermediate and 84% would welcome dedicated training on LLMs. The majority of rheumatologists anticipated AI implementation to improve patient care (60%) and reduce daily workload (62%). Especially for diagnosis (73%), writing medical reports (70%), and data analysis (70%), rheumatologists reported a potential positive benefit of AI. Main AI concerns addressed the responsibility for medical decisions (64%) and data security (58%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the results indicate that rheumatologists currently have little AI knowledge and make very little use of AI in clinical routine. However, the majority of rheumatologists anticipate positive AI effects and would welcome increased AI implementation and dedicated training programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1759720X241275818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X241275818\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X241275818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能(AI)的发展和潜力令人瞩目。它在包括风湿病学在内的所有医学学科中的应用都备受关注。人工智能在风湿病学临床常规中的应用程度尚不清楚。此外,风湿病学家对人工智能的认知障碍、潜力和期望也尚未得到研究:研究风湿病学家对人工智能(包括大型语言模型)的当前使用情况、感知障碍和促进因素:设计:全国性、观察性、非干预性、横断面网络研究:德国风湿病学会青年风湿病学工作组(AGJR)开发了一项网络调查。从 8 月 30 日到 2023 年 11 月 4 日,调查表在德国风湿病学会大会上分发,并通过社交媒体、二维码和电子邮件进行传播:对 172 名风湿病学家(55% 为女性,平均年龄 43 岁)的回复进行了分析。大多数人表示,他们以前在日常工作中没有使用过人工智能(73%)。88%的风湿免疫科医生将自己的人工智能知识评为中低级,84%的医生欢迎接受有关 LLM 的专门培训。大多数风湿免疫科医生希望人工智能的应用能改善患者护理(60%)和减少日常工作量(62%)。特别是在诊断(73%)、撰写医疗报告(70%)和数据分析(70%)方面,风湿免疫科医生表示人工智能可能带来积极的益处。人工智能的主要问题涉及医疗决策责任(64%)和数据安全(58%):总体而言,研究结果表明,风湿病学家目前对人工智能知之甚少,在临床日常工作中也很少使用人工智能。然而,大多数风湿病学家都预期人工智能会产生积极影响,并欢迎加强人工智能的实施和专门的培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: status quo and quo vadis-results of a national survey among German rheumatologists.

Background: The development and potential of artificial intelligence (AI) is remarkable. Its application in all medical disciplines, including rheumatology, is attracting attention. To what extent AI is already used in clinical routine in rheumatology is unknown. In addition, the perceived barriers, potentials, and expectations regarding AI by rheumatologists have not yet been studied.

Objectives: To examine the current usage and perceived barriers and facilitators of AI, including large language models (LLMs), among rheumatologists.

Design: National, observational, non-interventional, and cross-sectional web-based study.

Methods: A web-based survey was developed by the Working Group Young Rheumatology (AGJR) of the German Society for Rheumatology. The survey was distributed at the Congress of the German Society for Rheumatology and via social media, QR code, and email from August 30 until November 4, 2023.

Results: Responses from 172 rheumatologists (55% female; mean age 43 years) were analyzed. The majority stated that they did not previously use AI (73%) in their daily practice. Eighty-eight percent of rheumatologists rated their AI knowledge as low to intermediate and 84% would welcome dedicated training on LLMs. The majority of rheumatologists anticipated AI implementation to improve patient care (60%) and reduce daily workload (62%). Especially for diagnosis (73%), writing medical reports (70%), and data analysis (70%), rheumatologists reported a potential positive benefit of AI. Main AI concerns addressed the responsibility for medical decisions (64%) and data security (58%).

Conclusion: Overall, the results indicate that rheumatologists currently have little AI knowledge and make very little use of AI in clinical routine. However, the majority of rheumatologists anticipate positive AI effects and would welcome increased AI implementation and dedicated training programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信