创伤患者排除胸腰椎骨折的临床诊断工具。

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_145_23
Sajid Atique, Ahammed Mekkodathil, Tariq Siddiqui, Saji Mathradikkal, Khalid Ahmed, Mushreq Al-Ani, Ahad Kanbar, Abubaker Alaieb, Suhail Hakim, Basil Younis, Ahmed Ajaj, Aldwin Guerrero, Maarij Masood, Sherwan Khoschnau, Abdel Aziz Hammo, Nuri Abdurraheim, Husham Abdelrahman, Ruben Peralta, Syed Nabir, Shatha Al-Hilli, Ayman El-Menyar, Hassan Al-Thani
{"title":"创伤患者排除胸腰椎骨折的临床诊断工具。","authors":"Sajid Atique, Ahammed Mekkodathil, Tariq Siddiqui, Saji Mathradikkal, Khalid Ahmed, Mushreq Al-Ani, Ahad Kanbar, Abubaker Alaieb, Suhail Hakim, Basil Younis, Ahmed Ajaj, Aldwin Guerrero, Maarij Masood, Sherwan Khoschnau, Abdel Aziz Hammo, Nuri Abdurraheim, Husham Abdelrahman, Ruben Peralta, Syed Nabir, Shatha Al-Hilli, Ayman El-Menyar, Hassan Al-Thani","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_145_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the clinical decision tool (CDT) in trauma patients, providing a comparable ability to rule out thoracolumbar (TL) fractures as traditional imaging methods. The goal is to facilitate early clearance of the TL spine without an immediate requirement for radiological tests, thereby minimizing unnecessary utilization of TL-spine imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, observational study was conducted on trauma patients with suspected TL injury. To achieve early TL clearance, the CDT assessed criteria such as absence of pain, tenderness, and pain-free axial movement and flexion. The study enrolled alert trauma patients with thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries, defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale of 15. The study excluded patients not aligning with CDT criteria, such as those who received intravenous opioid analgesia within 4 h and those unable to stand due to suspected pelvic or lower limb injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the completion of the CDT steps, there were 31 true negative cases, signifying the absence of TL fractures according to both CDT and imaging studies. The sensitivity of the CDT was 99.38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.59%-99.98%), specificity 9.1% (95% CI: 6.30%-12.73%), negative predictive value (NPV) 96.87% (95% CI: 81.02%-99.56%), positive predictive value (PPV) 34.19% (95% CI: 33.38%-35.00%), negative likelihood ratio (LHR) 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01-0.49), and positive LHR 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, negative LHR, and positive LHR varied with each step in the CDT. Notably, the overall sensitivity was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in specificity with each further step in the tool. The overall sensitivity in the study cohort (<i>n</i> = 500) was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in the specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDT to rule out TL fracture is a feasible bedside stepwise tool in fully awake trauma patients after a thorough clinical neurological examination on arrival. The tool could help Level II or III trauma centers avoid secondary triage to the higher center.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"17 3","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Clinical Tool in Trauma Patients to Rule out Thoracolumbar Fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Sajid Atique, Ahammed Mekkodathil, Tariq Siddiqui, Saji Mathradikkal, Khalid Ahmed, Mushreq Al-Ani, Ahad Kanbar, Abubaker Alaieb, Suhail Hakim, Basil Younis, Ahmed Ajaj, Aldwin Guerrero, Maarij Masood, Sherwan Khoschnau, Abdel Aziz Hammo, Nuri Abdurraheim, Husham Abdelrahman, Ruben Peralta, Syed Nabir, Shatha Al-Hilli, Ayman El-Menyar, Hassan Al-Thani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jets.jets_145_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the clinical decision tool (CDT) in trauma patients, providing a comparable ability to rule out thoracolumbar (TL) fractures as traditional imaging methods. The goal is to facilitate early clearance of the TL spine without an immediate requirement for radiological tests, thereby minimizing unnecessary utilization of TL-spine imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, observational study was conducted on trauma patients with suspected TL injury. To achieve early TL clearance, the CDT assessed criteria such as absence of pain, tenderness, and pain-free axial movement and flexion. The study enrolled alert trauma patients with thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries, defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale of 15. The study excluded patients not aligning with CDT criteria, such as those who received intravenous opioid analgesia within 4 h and those unable to stand due to suspected pelvic or lower limb injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the completion of the CDT steps, there were 31 true negative cases, signifying the absence of TL fractures according to both CDT and imaging studies. The sensitivity of the CDT was 99.38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.59%-99.98%), specificity 9.1% (95% CI: 6.30%-12.73%), negative predictive value (NPV) 96.87% (95% CI: 81.02%-99.56%), positive predictive value (PPV) 34.19% (95% CI: 33.38%-35.00%), negative likelihood ratio (LHR) 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01-0.49), and positive LHR 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, negative LHR, and positive LHR varied with each step in the CDT. Notably, the overall sensitivity was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in specificity with each further step in the tool. The overall sensitivity in the study cohort (<i>n</i> = 500) was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in the specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDT to rule out TL fracture is a feasible bedside stepwise tool in fully awake trauma patients after a thorough clinical neurological examination on arrival. The tool could help Level II or III trauma centers avoid secondary triage to the higher center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"159-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563237/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_145_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_145_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究的主要目的是评估临床决策工具(CDT)在创伤患者中的有效性,该工具在排除胸腰椎(TL)骨折方面的能力与传统的成像方法相当。目的是在不需要立即进行放射学检查的情况下促进 TL 脊柱的早期清理,从而最大限度地减少对 TL 脊柱成像的不必要使用:方法:对疑似 TL 损伤的创伤患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。为了尽早清除 TL,CDT 评估标准包括无痛、无压痛、无痛轴向移动和屈曲。该研究招募了胸椎和/或腰椎受伤的警戒创伤患者,以格拉斯哥昏迷量表 15 分为标准。研究排除了不符合 CDT 标准的患者,如在 4 小时内接受过静脉阿片类镇痛的患者,以及因怀疑骨盆或下肢受伤而无法站立的患者:完成 CDT 步骤后,共有 31 例真正的阴性病例,表明 CDT 和影像学检查均未发现 TL 骨折。CDT 的灵敏度为 99.38%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:96.59%-99.98%),特异性为 9.1%(95% CI:6.30%-12.73%),阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 96.87%(95% CI:81.阴性似然比 (LHR) 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01-0.49), 阳性似然比 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13)。灵敏度、特异性、NPV、PPV、阴性 LHR 和阳性 LHR 随 CDT 的每个步骤而变化。值得注意的是,总体灵敏度较高;然而,随着工具的每一步操作,尽管特异性有所提高,但逐步提高的灵敏度却有所下降。研究队列(n = 500)的总体灵敏度较高;但逐步降低了灵敏度,尽管特异性有所提高:排除 TL 骨折的 CDT 是一种可行的床旁分步工具,适用于在到达时进行全面临床神经系统检查后完全清醒的创伤患者。该工具可帮助二级或三级创伤中心避免向上级中心进行二次分流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Clinical Tool in Trauma Patients to Rule out Thoracolumbar Fracture.

Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the clinical decision tool (CDT) in trauma patients, providing a comparable ability to rule out thoracolumbar (TL) fractures as traditional imaging methods. The goal is to facilitate early clearance of the TL spine without an immediate requirement for radiological tests, thereby minimizing unnecessary utilization of TL-spine imaging.

Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted on trauma patients with suspected TL injury. To achieve early TL clearance, the CDT assessed criteria such as absence of pain, tenderness, and pain-free axial movement and flexion. The study enrolled alert trauma patients with thoracic and/or lumbar spine injuries, defined by the Glasgow Coma Scale of 15. The study excluded patients not aligning with CDT criteria, such as those who received intravenous opioid analgesia within 4 h and those unable to stand due to suspected pelvic or lower limb injuries.

Results: Following the completion of the CDT steps, there were 31 true negative cases, signifying the absence of TL fractures according to both CDT and imaging studies. The sensitivity of the CDT was 99.38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.59%-99.98%), specificity 9.1% (95% CI: 6.30%-12.73%), negative predictive value (NPV) 96.87% (95% CI: 81.02%-99.56%), positive predictive value (PPV) 34.19% (95% CI: 33.38%-35.00%), negative likelihood ratio (LHR) 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01-0.49), and positive LHR 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06-1.13). The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, negative LHR, and positive LHR varied with each step in the CDT. Notably, the overall sensitivity was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in specificity with each further step in the tool. The overall sensitivity in the study cohort (n = 500) was high; however, the stepwise sensitivity decreased, albeit with an improvement in the specificity.

Conclusions: The CDT to rule out TL fracture is a feasible bedside stepwise tool in fully awake trauma patients after a thorough clinical neurological examination on arrival. The tool could help Level II or III trauma centers avoid secondary triage to the higher center.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信