使用半腱肌腱移植进行前交叉韧带重建术后疼痛控制:内收肌通道阻滞与局部浸润镇痛的随机对照试验。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241292604
Sermsak Sumanont, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Aumjit Wittayapairoj, Punyawat Apiwatanakul, Artit Boonrod
{"title":"使用半腱肌腱移植进行前交叉韧带重建术后疼痛控制:内收肌通道阻滞与局部浸润镇痛的随机对照试验。","authors":"Sermsak Sumanont, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Aumjit Wittayapairoj, Punyawat Apiwatanakul, Artit Boonrod","doi":"10.1177/23259671241292604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; <i>P</i> = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; <i>P</i> = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241292604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia.\",\"authors\":\"Sermsak Sumanont, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Aumjit Wittayapairoj, Punyawat Apiwatanakul, Artit Boonrod\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671241292604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; <i>P</i> = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; <i>P</i> = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"23259671241292604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565623/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241292604\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241292604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在关节镜辅助下进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术(ACLR)后,内收肌管阻滞(ACB)和局部浸润(LI)都能有效控制术后疼痛。目的:比较 ACB 和 LI,评估半腱肌腱移植 ACLR 术后 48 小时内的吗啡消耗量;次要目的:评估疼痛程度、患者满意度、股四头肌力量、膝关节活动范围和并发症:研究设计:随机对照试验;证据级别,1.方法:采用半腱肌腱移植物进行初级 ACLR 的患者被随机分为两组,在手术伤口、移植物采集区域和关节内注射 ACB(0.25% 布比卡因;20 mL)或 LI。LI组接受吗啡(3 毫克)、酮咯酸(30 毫克)和氨甲环酸(1 克)治疗。使用静脉患者控制镇痛装置监测 48 小时内的吗啡消耗量:共分析了 48 名患者(每组 24 人);各组的基线特征相似。6小时时,LI组的吗啡消耗量明显少于ACB组(中位数[四分位数间距,IQR],LI组为3毫克[0-4.8毫克],ACB组为5.5毫克[2-9毫克];P = .003)。然而,在其他时间点的吗啡消耗量没有观察到明显差异。此外,两组在 48 小时内的累积吗啡消耗量也无明显差异(中位数[IQR],ACB 组为 21.5 毫克[11-34.5 毫克],LI 组为 16.5 毫克[8.5-21.8 毫克];P = .137)。两组患者的术后疼痛评分、股四头肌力量和患者满意度相似:结论:LI 组和 ACB 组术后 48 小时的吗啡消耗量相当,在术后疼痛、股四头肌力量和患者满意度方面没有发现明显的组间差异:注册:TCTR20190320003(泰国临床试验注册中心)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia.

Background: Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.

Purpose: To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.

Results: A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; P = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; P = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.

Registration: TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信