胃肝样腺癌:利用基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学提名图与传统胃腺癌进行鉴别。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.21037/jgo-24-210
Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang
{"title":"胃肝样腺癌:利用基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学提名图与传统胃腺癌进行鉴别。","authors":"Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang","doi":"10.21037/jgo-24-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","volume":"15 5","pages":"2041-2052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jgo-24-210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"2041-2052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前的研究发现,很难将胃肝样腺癌(HAS)与传统胃腺癌(CGA)区分开来。我们旨在评估基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的放射组学提名图在识别 HAS 方面的功效:收集了 59 名 HAS 患者和 122 名 CGA 患者的门静脉相 CT 图像。通过对临床特征、血清生化标志物和 CT 特征进行单变量分析,区分 HAS 和 CGA。放射组学特征的构建采用了最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归模型。多变量逻辑回归分析用于建立基于CT的放射组学提名图:结果:HAS 患者与 CGA 患者的分离依赖于血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平和放射组学特征。在训练队列中,甲胎蛋白的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.726 [95% 置信区间 (CI):0.639-0.801],在测试队列中为 0.681 (95% CI:0.541-0.800),而放射组学特征的曲线下面积(AUC)明显更高,在训练队列中为 0.949 (95% CI:0.895-0.980),在测试队列中为 0.868 (95% CI:0.749-0.944)。提名图模型在识别HAS方面具有极高的准确性,在训练队列中的AUC为0.970(95% CI:0.923-0.992),在测试队列中的AUC为0.905(95% CI:0.796-0.968):放射组学分析有望区分HAS和CGA,基于CT的放射组学提名图可能对区分HAS具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.

Background: Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS.

Methods: Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram.

Results: The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort.

Conclusions: Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: ournal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Print ISSN 2078-6891; Online ISSN 2219-679X; J Gastrointest Oncol; JGO), the official journal of Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (SGO), is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly (Sep. 2010- Dec. 2013), bimonthly (Feb. 2014 -) and openly distributed worldwide. JGO publishes manuscripts that focus on updated and practical information about diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging and tumor biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信