Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang
{"title":"胃肝样腺癌:利用基于计算机断层扫描的放射组学提名图与传统胃腺癌进行鉴别。","authors":"Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang","doi":"10.21037/jgo-24-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","volume":"15 5","pages":"2041-2052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jgo-24-210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"2041-2052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.
Background: Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS.
Methods: Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram.
Results: The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort.
Conclusions: Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.
期刊介绍:
ournal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Print ISSN 2078-6891; Online ISSN 2219-679X; J Gastrointest Oncol; JGO), the official journal of Society for Gastrointestinal Oncology (SGO), is an open-access, international peer-reviewed journal. It is published quarterly (Sep. 2010- Dec. 2013), bimonthly (Feb. 2014 -) and openly distributed worldwide.
JGO publishes manuscripts that focus on updated and practical information about diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging and tumor biology.