利用基于模型的荟萃分析建立口服联合避孕药突破性出血模型。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Huili Chen, Dain Chun, Karthik Lingineni, Serge Guzy, Rodrigo Cristofoletti, Joachim Hoechel, Tianze Jiao, Brian Cicali, Valvanera Vozmediano, Stephan Schmidt
{"title":"利用基于模型的荟萃分析建立口服联合避孕药突破性出血模型。","authors":"Huili Chen,&nbsp;Dain Chun,&nbsp;Karthik Lingineni,&nbsp;Serge Guzy,&nbsp;Rodrigo Cristofoletti,&nbsp;Joachim Hoechel,&nbsp;Tianze Jiao,&nbsp;Brian Cicali,&nbsp;Valvanera Vozmediano,&nbsp;Stephan Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Breakthrough bleeding (BTB) is a common side effect of hormonal contraception and is thought to impact adherence to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) but respective dose–response relationships are not yet fully understood. Therefore, the objective of this model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was to establish dose–response for COCs containing different progestin/EE combinations using BTB as the pharmacodynamic endpoint. Data from 25 studies containing BTB information of 4 progestins (desogestrel, drospirenone, gestodene, and levonorgestrel) in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) at various dose levels was used for this analysis. The results of our MBMA show that BTB is significantly increased upon initiation of COC use but subsides over time. The time needed for BTB to return to baseline depends on the EE dose and differs marginally between progestins during the initial months of use at the same EE dose. BTB typically returns to baseline within 3 months at the highest (30 μg) dose, whereas it can take significantly longer to reestablish a regular bleeding pattern at lower EE doses (15 and 20 μg), irrespective of the progestin used. The dose–response relationships established for BTB across different progestin/EE combinations can now be used to support the selection of optimal COC dosing/treatment regimens and serve as the scientific basis for evaluating the impact of clinically relevant factors, including drug–drug interactions and demographics, on BTB.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"13 11","pages":"2016-2025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13261","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of breakthrough bleeding model of combined-oral contraceptives utilizing model-based meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Huili Chen,&nbsp;Dain Chun,&nbsp;Karthik Lingineni,&nbsp;Serge Guzy,&nbsp;Rodrigo Cristofoletti,&nbsp;Joachim Hoechel,&nbsp;Tianze Jiao,&nbsp;Brian Cicali,&nbsp;Valvanera Vozmediano,&nbsp;Stephan Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.13261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Breakthrough bleeding (BTB) is a common side effect of hormonal contraception and is thought to impact adherence to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) but respective dose–response relationships are not yet fully understood. Therefore, the objective of this model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was to establish dose–response for COCs containing different progestin/EE combinations using BTB as the pharmacodynamic endpoint. Data from 25 studies containing BTB information of 4 progestins (desogestrel, drospirenone, gestodene, and levonorgestrel) in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) at various dose levels was used for this analysis. The results of our MBMA show that BTB is significantly increased upon initiation of COC use but subsides over time. The time needed for BTB to return to baseline depends on the EE dose and differs marginally between progestins during the initial months of use at the same EE dose. BTB typically returns to baseline within 3 months at the highest (30 μg) dose, whereas it can take significantly longer to reestablish a regular bleeding pattern at lower EE doses (15 and 20 μg), irrespective of the progestin used. The dose–response relationships established for BTB across different progestin/EE combinations can now be used to support the selection of optimal COC dosing/treatment regimens and serve as the scientific basis for evaluating the impact of clinically relevant factors, including drug–drug interactions and demographics, on BTB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"2016-2025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13261\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

突破性出血(BTB)是激素避孕的一种常见副作用,被认为会影响对复方口服避孕药(COCs)的依从性,但相关的剂量-反应关系尚未完全明了。因此,这项基于模型的荟萃分析(MBMA)旨在以BTB为药效学终点,确定含有不同孕激素/EE组合的COC的剂量反应。本分析采用了 25 项研究的数据,这些数据包含 4 种孕激素(去氧孕酮、屈螺酮、孕烯二烯和左炔诺孕酮)与炔雌醇(EE)在不同剂量水平下的 BTB 信息。我们的 MBMA 结果表明,开始使用 COC 时,BTB 会显著增加,但随着时间的推移会逐渐减弱。BTB 恢复到基线所需的时间取决于 EE 的剂量,在使用相同 EE 剂量的最初几个月中,不同孕激素之间的差异很小。使用最高剂量(30 微克)时,BTB 通常在 3 个月内恢复到基线,而使用较低的 EE 剂量(15 和 20 微克)时,无论使用哪种孕激素,都需要更长的时间才能恢复正常的出血模式。针对不同孕激素/EE 组合所建立的 BTB 剂量反应关系现在可用于支持选择最佳 COC 剂量/治疗方案,并作为评估临床相关因素(包括药物间相互作用和人口统计学因素)对 BTB 影响的科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development of breakthrough bleeding model of combined-oral contraceptives utilizing model-based meta-analysis

Development of breakthrough bleeding model of combined-oral contraceptives utilizing model-based meta-analysis

Breakthrough bleeding (BTB) is a common side effect of hormonal contraception and is thought to impact adherence to combined oral contraceptives (COCs) but respective dose–response relationships are not yet fully understood. Therefore, the objective of this model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was to establish dose–response for COCs containing different progestin/EE combinations using BTB as the pharmacodynamic endpoint. Data from 25 studies containing BTB information of 4 progestins (desogestrel, drospirenone, gestodene, and levonorgestrel) in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) at various dose levels was used for this analysis. The results of our MBMA show that BTB is significantly increased upon initiation of COC use but subsides over time. The time needed for BTB to return to baseline depends on the EE dose and differs marginally between progestins during the initial months of use at the same EE dose. BTB typically returns to baseline within 3 months at the highest (30 μg) dose, whereas it can take significantly longer to reestablish a regular bleeding pattern at lower EE doses (15 and 20 μg), irrespective of the progestin used. The dose–response relationships established for BTB across different progestin/EE combinations can now be used to support the selection of optimal COC dosing/treatment regimens and serve as the scientific basis for evaluating the impact of clinically relevant factors, including drug–drug interactions and demographics, on BTB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信