局部晚期直肠癌老年患者手术的生存获益。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/XSKR3897
Hsuan-Yi Huang, Chia-Jen Tsai, Chia-Lin Chou, Li-Chin Cheng, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Yu-Cih Wu, Chung-Han Ho, Ching-Chieh Yang
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌老年患者手术的生存获益。","authors":"Hsuan-Yi Huang, Chia-Jen Tsai, Chia-Lin Chou, Li-Chin Cheng, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Yu-Cih Wu, Chung-Han Ho, Ching-Chieh Yang","doi":"10.62347/XSKR3897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, compared to younger patients, elderly patients often had multiple commodities and may refuse surgery due to being medically unfit or the high risk of operative mortality. This study aims to explore the effects of surgery on short- and long-term mortality in elderly LARC patients using a nationwide cancer registry. The cohort included 6211 patients aged over 65, with 2556 matched through propensity scoring for comparison between surgery (N = 1704) and non-surgery (N = 852) groups. The Cox proportional hazard model compared mortality between these groups. Our results showed that the elderly LARC patients who underwent surgery were more likely to be younger (65-75 years), have clinically-positive lymph nodes, and no comorbidities. Surgery was associated with significantly lower 3-month, 6-month, and 5-year mortality rates, with a greater absolute survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.78; 95% CI, 2.71-8.43; aHR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.07-6.58 and aHR, 3.81; 95% CI, 3.21-4.51). In stratified analysis, surgery remains provide significantly survival benefit according different age, gender and clinical classification. Furthermore, among non-surgical patients, those receiving chemoradiation had better survival outcomes compared to those receiving radiation, chemotherapy, or no treatment (all P < 0.001). This study highlights the survival advantage of surgery in elderly LARC patients and offers valuable guidance for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"14 10","pages":"4956-4968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival benefit of surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hsuan-Yi Huang, Chia-Jen Tsai, Chia-Lin Chou, Li-Chin Cheng, Yu-Hsuan Kuo, Yu-Cih Wu, Chung-Han Ho, Ching-Chieh Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/XSKR3897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, compared to younger patients, elderly patients often had multiple commodities and may refuse surgery due to being medically unfit or the high risk of operative mortality. This study aims to explore the effects of surgery on short- and long-term mortality in elderly LARC patients using a nationwide cancer registry. The cohort included 6211 patients aged over 65, with 2556 matched through propensity scoring for comparison between surgery (N = 1704) and non-surgery (N = 852) groups. The Cox proportional hazard model compared mortality between these groups. Our results showed that the elderly LARC patients who underwent surgery were more likely to be younger (65-75 years), have clinically-positive lymph nodes, and no comorbidities. Surgery was associated with significantly lower 3-month, 6-month, and 5-year mortality rates, with a greater absolute survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.78; 95% CI, 2.71-8.43; aHR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.07-6.58 and aHR, 3.81; 95% CI, 3.21-4.51). In stratified analysis, surgery remains provide significantly survival benefit according different age, gender and clinical classification. Furthermore, among non-surgical patients, those receiving chemoradiation had better survival outcomes compared to those receiving radiation, chemotherapy, or no treatment (all P < 0.001). This study highlights the survival advantage of surgery in elderly LARC patients and offers valuable guidance for clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"4956-4968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560825/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/XSKR3897\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XSKR3897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗方法是先进行新辅助治疗,然后再进行根治性手术。然而,与年轻患者相比,老年患者通常有多种商品,可能会因身体状况不适合或手术死亡率高而拒绝手术。本研究旨在利用全国范围内的癌症登记资料,探讨手术对老年 LARC 患者短期和长期死亡率的影响。队列中包括 6211 名 65 岁以上的患者,其中 2556 人通过倾向评分进行匹配,以便在手术组(1704 人)和非手术组(852 人)之间进行比较。采用 Cox 比例危险模型比较了这两组患者的死亡率。我们的研究结果表明,接受手术治疗的老年 LARC 患者更有可能更年轻(65-75 岁)、淋巴结临床阳性且无合并症。手术治疗与明显较低的 3 个月、6 个月和 5 年死亡率相关,并具有更大的绝对生存获益(调整后危险比 [aHR],4.78;95% CI,2.71-8.43;aHR,4.50;95% CI,3.07-6.58 和 aHR,3.81;95% CI,3.21-4.51)。在分层分析中,根据不同的年龄、性别和临床分级,手术仍能显著提高生存率。此外,在非手术患者中,与接受放疗、化疗或不接受治疗的患者相比,接受化疗的患者生存率更高(P均<0.001)。这项研究强调了手术治疗在老年 LARC 患者中的生存优势,并为临床决策提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival benefit of surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery is standard for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, compared to younger patients, elderly patients often had multiple commodities and may refuse surgery due to being medically unfit or the high risk of operative mortality. This study aims to explore the effects of surgery on short- and long-term mortality in elderly LARC patients using a nationwide cancer registry. The cohort included 6211 patients aged over 65, with 2556 matched through propensity scoring for comparison between surgery (N = 1704) and non-surgery (N = 852) groups. The Cox proportional hazard model compared mortality between these groups. Our results showed that the elderly LARC patients who underwent surgery were more likely to be younger (65-75 years), have clinically-positive lymph nodes, and no comorbidities. Surgery was associated with significantly lower 3-month, 6-month, and 5-year mortality rates, with a greater absolute survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.78; 95% CI, 2.71-8.43; aHR, 4.50; 95% CI, 3.07-6.58 and aHR, 3.81; 95% CI, 3.21-4.51). In stratified analysis, surgery remains provide significantly survival benefit according different age, gender and clinical classification. Furthermore, among non-surgical patients, those receiving chemoradiation had better survival outcomes compared to those receiving radiation, chemotherapy, or no treatment (all P < 0.001). This study highlights the survival advantage of surgery in elderly LARC patients and offers valuable guidance for clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信