Ogechukwu C Onuh, Michael F Cassidy, David L Tran, Hilliard T Brydges, Miguel I Dorante, Matteo Laspro, John Muller, Lifei Guo, Nikhil A Agrawal, Ernest S Chiu
{"title":"门诊手部手术的利用率:通过优化手术器械托盘降低成本。","authors":"Ogechukwu C Onuh, Michael F Cassidy, David L Tran, Hilliard T Brydges, Miguel I Dorante, Matteo Laspro, John Muller, Lifei Guo, Nikhil A Agrawal, Ernest S Chiu","doi":"10.1177/15589447241288255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective is to evaluate the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical instruments during a commonly performed ambulatory hand surgery case as an avenue for cost reduction, increased operating room efficiency, and systems quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The total number of instruments opened at the start of the case was recorded followed by instruments being divided into those used and not used during the procedure. Total sterile processing costs were estimated at $1.56 per instrument according to data from our institution's central sterilization processing (CSP) department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen hand procedures performed by 2 surgeons were included in this study. An average of 120.1 ± 10.9 instruments were opened at the start of each case, while an average of 12.6 ± 5.4 instruments were used per case (Figure 1). This yielded an UF of 10.7% ± 4.8%. Using our internal CSP estimate, we calculated an annual cost of $16 863 to reprocess the current hand tray (Figure 2). Using literature data, this cost ranged from $5 513 to $34 484 annually. The same cost calculations were performed for the theoretical optimized tray (incorporating instruments used at least 20% of the time when opened) containing 23.2 instruments. The annual reprocessing cost of this new tray according to CSP data was $3 260, demonstrating a cost-reduction of $13 603 or 80.7% (Figure 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of pre- and peri-operative processes is a valuable technique to mitigate increasing healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary healthcare spending, with broad applicability to multiple surgical subspecialties and procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447241288255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization Fraction of Ambulatory Hand Procedures: Cost-Reduction Through Surgical Instrument Tray Optimization.\",\"authors\":\"Ogechukwu C Onuh, Michael F Cassidy, David L Tran, Hilliard T Brydges, Miguel I Dorante, Matteo Laspro, John Muller, Lifei Guo, Nikhil A Agrawal, Ernest S Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447241288255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective is to evaluate the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical instruments during a commonly performed ambulatory hand surgery case as an avenue for cost reduction, increased operating room efficiency, and systems quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The total number of instruments opened at the start of the case was recorded followed by instruments being divided into those used and not used during the procedure. Total sterile processing costs were estimated at $1.56 per instrument according to data from our institution's central sterilization processing (CSP) department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen hand procedures performed by 2 surgeons were included in this study. An average of 120.1 ± 10.9 instruments were opened at the start of each case, while an average of 12.6 ± 5.4 instruments were used per case (Figure 1). This yielded an UF of 10.7% ± 4.8%. Using our internal CSP estimate, we calculated an annual cost of $16 863 to reprocess the current hand tray (Figure 2). Using literature data, this cost ranged from $5 513 to $34 484 annually. The same cost calculations were performed for the theoretical optimized tray (incorporating instruments used at least 20% of the time when opened) containing 23.2 instruments. The annual reprocessing cost of this new tray according to CSP data was $3 260, demonstrating a cost-reduction of $13 603 or 80.7% (Figure 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of pre- and peri-operative processes is a valuable technique to mitigate increasing healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary healthcare spending, with broad applicability to multiple surgical subspecialties and procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15589447241288255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571127/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241288255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241288255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization Fraction of Ambulatory Hand Procedures: Cost-Reduction Through Surgical Instrument Tray Optimization.
Background: Our objective is to evaluate the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical instruments during a commonly performed ambulatory hand surgery case as an avenue for cost reduction, increased operating room efficiency, and systems quality improvement.
Methods: The total number of instruments opened at the start of the case was recorded followed by instruments being divided into those used and not used during the procedure. Total sterile processing costs were estimated at $1.56 per instrument according to data from our institution's central sterilization processing (CSP) department.
Results: Nineteen hand procedures performed by 2 surgeons were included in this study. An average of 120.1 ± 10.9 instruments were opened at the start of each case, while an average of 12.6 ± 5.4 instruments were used per case (Figure 1). This yielded an UF of 10.7% ± 4.8%. Using our internal CSP estimate, we calculated an annual cost of $16 863 to reprocess the current hand tray (Figure 2). Using literature data, this cost ranged from $5 513 to $34 484 annually. The same cost calculations were performed for the theoretical optimized tray (incorporating instruments used at least 20% of the time when opened) containing 23.2 instruments. The annual reprocessing cost of this new tray according to CSP data was $3 260, demonstrating a cost-reduction of $13 603 or 80.7% (Figure 2).
Conclusions: Evaluation of pre- and peri-operative processes is a valuable technique to mitigate increasing healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary healthcare spending, with broad applicability to multiple surgical subspecialties and procedures.
期刊介绍:
HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.